Verified Document

The First Amendment And Texas Law Essay

Related Topics:

This essay is on the law cases Virginia v. Black and Texas v. Johnson.

Issues before the Court



The issues before the court in the two cases were related to the first Amendment about the speech. Hate speech, in particular, was the concept that was analyzed. In Texas vs. Johnson, the issue was whether cross burning is one of the constituents of symbolic speech as provided by the First Amendment. In Virginia vs. Black, the issue was whether cross burning statutes in Virginia or any other state as a prima facie evidence unconstitutional or not (Holzer, 649).

The decision of the courts and the reasons



In Texas vs. Johnson, the court ruled in favor of Johnson. It argued that cross burning constitutes symbolic speech and the First Amendment in the Constitution protects it. The reasoning of the majority argued that the freedom of speech protects some of the actions that are seen by the society as very offensive. However, the outrage of the society is not a justification to suppress the free speech. The majority argued that the Texas Law discriminated upon the viewpoint in that it allowed actions that were respectful of venerated objects that include...
Black, the court ruled that such a statute was unconstitutional although the majority argued that a state may ban cross burning if it is carried out with the intention to intimidate. Using the act as a prima facie was found to be unconstitutional by the court, which means that the state of Virginia cannot convict a person on the ground that he or she burns a cross unless such an act is done with the intention of causing harm. The judges asserted that in the case of the statute remaining as it is, a citizen's ideas might be suppressed and not expressed. It was likely that one may be convicted of such offenses. The court argued that it is important and necessary to create a separation between the expression of anger or hatred from the intentions of causing harm or threat when it comes to the ground of lawful conviction. It is therefore against the First Amendment to allow the feeling to be interpreted as an intention to cause fear or perform some illegal actions (Hartley, 1).

Precedents



One of the precedent cases to Texas v. Johnson was the West Virginia Board of Education v. Barrette (1943)…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

First Amendment in 1787 Our Forefathers Ratified
Words: 1484 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

First Amendment In 1787 our forefathers ratified the constitution of the United States of America, which contains the most important document to any American citizen, the Bill of Rights (Magarian, 2012). The First Amendment to the United Sates Constitution is known to be part of the nation's Bill of Rights. The first amendment is maybe the most vital section of the United States Constitution for the reason that the amendment guarantees the people

Gun Control and First Amendment
Words: 856 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

It would also be highly recommended that there are designated buffer zones between the convention and any designated First Amendment Zones. Additionally, these zones must be away from any other public areas. If they are too close to public areas, like malls, they may inadvertently disrupt the flow of the public and endanger passersby. There are also recommendations for general policy of the possible disruption of protest groups at the

The First Amendment Cyberbullying
Words: 783 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Cyberbullying and the First Amendment 1Cyberbullying and the First AmendmentCyberbullying is categorized as harassment in the first amendment, and several cases have been used to explain this. According to the first amendment, cyberbullying is a kind of bullying done using any electronic communication service. It also uses cellular and other telephones, computers, cameras, electronic mail, text messaging, or instant messaging. It can also be done using an internet website, social

1st Amendment the First Amendment
Words: 1121 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Many conservatives believe that the Anti- Establishment Clause prohibits only the actual establishment of a national religion in the manner of the English Crown. To them, the right to freedom of religion is all that the First Amendment guarantees, not the right to be free from religion (Dershowitz, p. 202). Luckily for those who consider themselves atheists and agnostics, the Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment to include the separation of

Texas V. Johnson America, the
Words: 1844 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

") Represtitive Ron Paul against the amendment states, "(R.-Tex.) I had serious questions about the resolution. "I am concerned that we are going to do something here today that Castro did in Cuba for 40 years. There is a prohibition against flag-burning in Cuba. And one of the very first things that Red China did when it took over Hong Kong was to pass an amendment similar to this, to make

Texas Constitution of 1876 Texas
Words: 1475 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Women, for example, only gained their right of suffrage in 1920 and Article VI of the Constitution of 1876 only gives "male persons" over the age of 21 who have "resided in Texas for at least one year" the right to vote. Compact Theory: The compact theory holds that the formation of the Union of the United States was through a "compact" of all the States individually and the creation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now