Tesla Motors has a cash flow problem, which makes it vulnerable to the many larger competitors who want into the electric vehicle business. The advantage Tesla has is with its battery technology, which is vastly superior to anybody else's, and in its brand name and leadership. The in-house distribution is unique to the industry but it might be too early to determine whether this is helping Tesla or hurting it. This paper will examine how these elements work on the company strategically, and there will be a recommendation to leverage the company's strengths while shoring up its weaknesses. It is recommended that the auto business is spun off into strategic partnership with an established automaker and that Tesla maintains its battery IP and energy business. The battery technology would be licensed to the auto company.
Major Issues
Tesla Motors has a future that is potentially promising, but there are a number of hurdles that the company needs to overcome in order for that future to materialize. First, the company has a cash flow problem. While they are increasing their revenues, they are also increasing their burn rate (MSN Moneycentral, 2015). They are engaged in major products that are years away from bringing in stable cash flow, and this is going to put the company at financial risk in the interim. The creation of Tesla Energy may serve as a means of getting some short-term cash flow, though arguably the economics of the product are limited outside of Germany (Castelvecchi, 2015).
The cash flow issue hints at another threat, that of competition. As the company notes in its latest annual report, there are a number of competitors getting into the electric car business. This is good in some ways, because it will help to improve the charging infrastructure overall, which will benefit Tesla. The key factor here is that the company currently has technological competitive advantage, and it will need to maintain that in order to for it to stay ahead of the competition. But the competitors are generally much larger and have much greater access to capital. If Tesla's cash flow issues cause it to lose its technological competitive advantage, it might not have very much else.
A third major strategic issue for the company is to generate higher sales in the U.S. And China, the two biggest markets in the world. While Tesla is a growing, successful company in Europe, there are issues that it needs to overcome in these markets. In the U.S., sales have been relatively flat since the Model S. was introduced, partially due to production constraints but also due to the charging infrastructure. Concerns about infrastructure are also hindering growth in China as well.
Analysis of External Environment
Porter's Five Forces Model is a good tool by which the profitability of an industry can be understood. This is a good model to use to understand Tesla, a company which has thus far struggled to generate a profit. The five forces are the bargaining power of buyers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, and the intensity of rivalry. The bargaining power of suppliers is not great in this industry -- not only is Tesla a major buyer but it is likely to become a bigger buyer in the future. For the major technologies that underpin the product, they are either developed in-house or with key strategic partners. The bargaining power of buyers is pretty high, given how much competition that there is in the automobile industry. That said, with technological superiority, Tesla has a certain amount of bargaining power in the market for electric cars. The major test of this bargaining power with buyers will be with the Model X is launched in 2016, as that is a more mainstream vehicle and Tesla will have to move out of its niche comfort zone to compete in that market.
The threat of new entrants is one of the most significant threats for the company, given that most major automakers are entering the electric car industry, and that they are better capitalized than Tesla, and can outspend Tesla in R&D. There has long been concern in the industry that Tesla will basically be the next Blackberry, leading the industry during the early stages only to be rendered irrelevant when the big money enters the industry. The threat of substitutes is actually quite low. While Tesla has sought to position itself against mainstream luxury cars, the reality is that the market for electric cars is somewhat distinct from the combustion engine car...
Tesla Motors became a public traded company, (NASDAQ stock quote code: TSLA), earlier this year. You are the Channels Manager for Tesla Motors. How do you think Tesla has developed its distribution strategy, i.e. what were the most important things to have been considered? With the launch of the model S. sedan due in 2012, how would you further develop the distribution strategy over the next five years, and why? Tesla
Foreign Entry Analysis – Developed Country Introduction In recent years, Tesla has grown to become one of the most renowned and successful companies in the US and across the globe. Tesla, Inc. is a clean company and a pioneer in electric vehicles with its headquarters in Palo Alto. It is a publicly-traded firm listed on the Nasdaq with the symbols TSLA (Agence France-Presse, 2010). The company is involved in the designing, developing,
Financial Research Report The company that I have selected to study is Tesla Motors. The reason for studying this company is that my investment advice practice has received a lot of calls about this company in particular. This is a company that has generated a tremendous amount of "bullish buzz" this year (Brumley, 2015). Opinions among the analyst community are decidedly mixed about Tesla stock. Some analysts view the stock from
Generic Strategy The company that I have chosen is Tesla, and they focus on a differentiation strategy. Michael Porter outlined the grand strategies that a company can follow in order to compete effectively in the marketplace, as being differentiation or cost leadership, and these can be either at the niche or broad-based size levels (QuickMBA, 2010). The differentiation strategy is defined as a strategy where the company seeks to compete on the
Ford Motors: Strategy to Beat Competitors Using Operations and Supply Chain Company Overview Ford Motor Company is the second largest automobile manufacturer in the United States apart from General Motors. The Ford Company is credited for the production of trucks and cars for mass markets. The company also produces car accessories such as cars' electronic components, vehicles' plastic, and replacement parts. Moreover, Ford Motor owns approximately 8% stakes in Aston Martin, a
Tesla Business Strategy AnalysisGeneric Business StrategiesTesla�s generic business strategy is broad differentiation, with a view toward integration of the various components of its business canvas. Its key businesses are automotive and energy generation and storage. It has key resources in terms of intellectual property (IP), engineering teams, and battery/solar production plants.CostTesla�s cost structure consists of the following: �equipment 20%, body 12%, chassis 7%, drive 15%, battery 35% and other 11%�
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now