Weapons of Mass Destruction
Nuclear terrorism or weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were labeled as the single most serious threat to the national security of the United States of America by President George W. Bush. When President Barack Obama came into office, he had the same sentiments about the growing terrorism in the Middle East. Our leaders and security experts see terrorist having access to WMD as nightmares when they sleep. The Japanese group Aum Shrinrikyo, Al Qaeda, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Lashkar al Tayyib and Jemmah Islamiya are few of the terrorist groups who have been known to gain access to chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. (Mowatt-Larssen, 2010, 5) Terrorist groups are present to spread terrorism all over the world as the name suggests. However, many would argue that these viscous people are only going to scare the world and not use any of them. However, seeing their statements and actions, it is very likely that the terrorist groups cold go onto use weapons of mass destruction. If not weapons that already known of, groups like al Qaeda could use some other forms of weapons which will cause the same scale casualties wherever used.
In 1998, al Qaeda leader, Osama bin Laden vowed that it was a religious duty for him to attain nuclear weapons in order to finish the wishes of the terrorist group. Bin Laden also went to state that even if he cannot fulfill the task, those recruited by him would take this as the most crucial priority. The most interesting thing of all is that Bin Laden has found a rationale and a reason for attain WMD and thus fulfilling the objectives of the group. In a 2007 video release, he specially stated that he wants to increase the level of fighting and increase the amount of American killings that occur due to Al Qaeda. (Mowatt-Larssen, 2010, 5)
The terrorist group is not aiming for the weapons like poisons, chemical bombs, and dirty bombs. Even though these weapons are the ones readily available, Osama Bin Laden's threat's specifically highlighted the mention of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Even though in Islamic law, the use of weapons for such massive killing would be prohibited, the group thinks it is the only way possible to combat the U.S. structural system. Whatever Al Qaeda is planning, it is doing so on a law scale. They could go out and carry out the killings on a far more critical level, but that is not what they are choosing to do. (Mowatt-Larssen, 2010, 5)
It has been to use here that the Al-Qaeda wishes to use WMD in the future and want to have access to them. The question is why t do they want to cause destruction at a massive level and what factors point to their determination to using WMD. The organizational structure of the group speaks for its goals and objectives. If Al Qaeda's major goal was to kill Americans at a large scale, it should have stopped after the World Trade Center bombings, but it didn't. (Long, 2008, 15) The reason why this didn't happen was they wanted to have a certain level of consistency and wanted their threat to be present throughout the years.
An analyst who writes for a counterterrorism think-tank stated the Al Qaeda's use of WMD in the future is 'inevitable' (Long, 2008, 14) He argued with the aforementioned notion of mass casualties not being the main incentive of Al Qaeda. The analyst argued that the use of WMD by the terrorist group would serve all the conventional purposes of terrorism. They would be successful in establishing a long-lasting psychological impact even if they were successful or not. The propaganda and merely the fact that the group has access to WMD would be symbolizing and fearful nonetheless. He believed that the main motive was to cause damage and cause mass causalities. (Long, 2008, 15)
Weapons of Mass Destruction Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century Security Environment The apparent anti-proliferation approach of the George W. Bush Administration to nuclear and other Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) seems to coincide with the perspective of Scott Sagan in The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate, as opposed to the deterrence perspective of his co-author, Kenneth Waltz. Security for major nations is currently under greater threat by the destabilizing effects
Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Next Terror: Assessment of How a Significant Terrorist WMD Attack Might Be Conducted by a Non-State Actors Perpetrator and Why They Can't Stage an Attack Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD) have considerable effect to the economies of both developed and developing countries. In the modern world, most terror groups have resolved to use Weapons of Mass Destruction to harm their enemies. The entire syndicate comprises
WMD Annotated Annotated Webography: Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) With the attacks on September 11th, 2001, the United States came face-to-face with the reality that our security strategy is far from impenetrable. To the contrary, the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and more recently, the Boston Marathon bombing, proved that we are quite vulnerable to mass casualty events. Perhaps most worrisome is the concern that such an
Countering the Threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) Purpose Statement Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons of mass destruction (WMD) area a threat that can completely disrupt an entire nation’s way of life. The current situation in China is a perfect illustration of what can happen when a biological weapon is used to destabilize a nation’s economy. China is currently grinding to a halt as the Covin-19 virus spreads like
Richard Butler's; "The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Crisis of Global Security." The writer of this paper analyzes the book's content and measures it against the current U.S. foreign policies. There was one source used to complete this paper. When the Soviet Union began to dismantle and the Berlin Wall came down the United States breathed a sigh of relief as it appeared the threat of
Weapons of Mass DestructionIntroductionThis paper addresses the methodology, and discusses the findings of the research. It also offers conclusions and recommendations for addressing the problem of WMD prevention. It applies the theoretical perspectives of Taylor and Follett and also looks at the impact of having an ethical framework in place. It concludes with recommendations for establishing an international effort to bring about the collaboration needed to prevent WMD proliferation.MethodologyThe method
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now