Unfortunately, most quantitative studies lack external validity in the research design to allow for general conclusions.
Teaching Theories and Nursing
It was Nightingale that recognized the potential of combining sound logical reflection and empirical research in the development of scientific knowledge that lead to evidence-based practices of today. She saw the need to only classify one's illness by the best possible available knowledge but to also collect patient information in the form of survey. Nightingale's work was also groundbreaking as it was the first to integrate such ideas into one method. She understood how factors such as housing and nutrition could have a direct influence on the patient's health and prognosis (McDonald, 2001, p. 68). Still many researchers to come would look at her work as primitive, inconclusive and one-sided. They would see how such details act as an extension of evidence and the attention paid to details as research of evidence (McDonald, 2001, p. 68). Many academics would argue that Nightingale served her purpose to offer a foundation for modern nursing but did not invent evidence-based nursing. Is it possible that such a foundation could grow into something broader to encompass modern research?
Many researchers argue the credit Florence Nightingale is given as the founder of modern nursing, evidence-based nursing and care. Many researchers argue that the framework in which evidence-based care is principled on did not exist prior to the 1960s and that the Nightingale method of questioning and survey also died with the matron. Simply, this is the basis of any academic dilemma, which side is right and which side is wrong? Literature suggests many points-of-view when it comes to evidence-based nursing and its evolution into a primary method of treatment in modern medicine. It is method not only used by nurses but also doctors and other medical professionals. Part of the issue and what raises evidence-based nursing and care as debated issue is the fact that it can be difficult to effectively label evidence. Depending on the professional consulted, each may have a different insight into what defines evidence and how it is collected. George Castledine believes evidence-based nursing did not start until the 1960s. Castledine (1997) writes, "research or evidence can be used in more than one way and the sue of research as a specific form of knowledge involved political, organizational, socioeconomic and attitudinal components" (p. 1).
This only opens the issue to more analysis as one contemplates the factors that make up evidence-based nursing. Is it fair for evidence to be based on guesswork? He also cites, "the problem with evidence-based approach is that it may become obsessed with the academic basis of nursing and fail to acknowledge the art of the subject" (p. 1). This creates the concept that nurses need to not only implement a fact-finding approach not just based on medical knowledge but also on humanity. Castledine (1997) believes, in order for such a method to work there must be a healthy balance (p. 1). Still this argument is just one point-of-view and does not create a framework or description of modern nursing. It, however, is advise to the nursing student in how to formulate their own approach. David Sackett, et al. (1996) understand the historical basis of such a method but are concerned with the power it presents to nurses. There is the concern that the practice while innovative may be out dated and only used to cut administrative costs to the health care system. Sackett, et al. (1996) write:
Evidence-based medicine is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence-based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systemic research. (p. 71)
While clear and distinct, this definition seems conservative in nature and devoid of creative, critical thinking. There is also the concern in modern medicine that when faced with a scenario of treating a patient, two outcomes will result. One, nurses will rely too heavily on their gut instinct and passion for care or two, nurses will look to clinical explanations and medical knowledge more than actual symptoms and listening to the patient's needs. This leads to problems regarding quality of care, customer service and administrative cost benefits. In this day and age of managed health care, evidence may not play a greater role; the reality of treatment efficiently becomes the main issue for...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now