Verified Document

Surgeon General Warning On Tobacco Term Paper

Warning Labels Not even 50 years ago, many people felt skeptical about the hazards of cigarette smoking. Although increasing numbers of studies showed that some connection existed between tobacco and lung and heart ailments, questions still remained about the true effects on health. In 1964, however, the United States Surgeon General Luther Terry confronted 200 media reporters in a State Department auditorium for two hours and completely changed the course of history. For the first time, the American government made it official: Smoking causes lung cancer. How much of an impact did this warning and other warnings to come by the Surgeon General and additional interested parties in the future alter the numbers of people smoking nationwide? The results are not too promising.

After the Surgeon General's first announcement, there was an immediate reaction. At this time, about 46% of people smoked in the U.S. When Americans heard the Surgeon General's words of warning, they decreased cigarette consumption by 20%. In addition, the number of individuals actually smoking fell as much as 30%. Research found that the vast majority of smokers believed their habit would harm their health. However, the reaction did not last long. The following year, more than 42% of adults were still smoking. This was despite the fact that the 1965 Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act required U.S. Surgeon General's warnings on all cigarette packs (Bowman).

Congress twice strengthened the labeling requirement. First, in 1969, it stipulated "Warning: The Surgeon General Has Determined that Cigarette Smoking is Dangerous to your Health," a significant upgrade from the 1965 "may be hazardous" wording. Next, in 1984, Congress went further and required that four different warnings be rotated. Each warning would be preceded by the phrase "Surgeon General's Warning.": 1) Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, Emphysema and May Complicate Pregnancy; 2) Quitting Smoking Now Greatly Reduces Serious Risks to Your Health; 3) Smoking by Pregnant Women May Result in Fetal Injury, Premature Birth and Low Birth Weight; and 4) Cigarette Smoke Contains Carbon Monoxide" (Derthick,15).

Do smokers feel they are at risk when seeing these labels?...

Some researchers have found that smokers overestimate the health risks of smoking. Such results challenge the belief that people begin and continue smoking in large part because they do not accept the risks. Other scholars, however, who use different questions to measure risk, conclude that smokers either accurately estimate or underestimate their risks (Weinstein, 135). Such conflicting reports do not come as a surprise. It is often found that research results will vary significantly depending on a number of different factors.
It is understood, however, that the majority of smokers clearly do acknowledge some risk, but they minimize the size of that risk and show a tendency to believe that the risk applies more to others than themselves. Bottom line: People do not want to believe that they will be the one impacted. Instead, it will be the guy/gal next door.

The findings of Romer and Jamieson are not any more positive. They looked at studies that researched how anticigarette advertising counteracts the favorable images of smoking pushed by the tobacco industry. They stated, " ... even if anticigarette advertising increases perceived risk, the overwhelming influence of tobacco industry advertising and promotion acts to increase favorable images and feelings associated with smoking. These images and feelings then reduce the perception of risk."

Levy adds to these grim statistics. He states that despite the mass media's extensive coverage of the findings of the U.S. Surgeon General and other research, not too many people (only 16% according to an American Cancer Society survey) believe that there is a correlation between cigarette smoking and lung cancer. This can be the result of a number of different factors. Perhaps the mind rejects the message or, never receives it. In the past 10 years, over 100 billion cigarettes have been sold domestically. Decreases in smoking consumption have only declined twice in two years since 1935: 1953 and 1954, the years following the publicity given the cancer studies. As soon as the tobacco industry began a campaign regarding the reduced risks of filtered cigarettes, the tide changed once again.

Another reason why warnings and labels may…

Sources used in this document:
References Cited

Bowman, Lee. "Potomac Watch: 40 years ago, government linked smoking to cancer."

Scripps Howard News Service, January 10, 2004. 31. May 2005. http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/156042_pot10.html

Eckman, B, & S. Goldberg. "The viability of the Marlboro Man among the 18-24 segment." Bates no. 204462266-2024462292., 8, 1992.

Geoffrey Fong. "UW Researcher to get U.S. Grant to study Warning Labels." 31 May, 2005. http://www.adm.uwaterloo.ca/infonews/release/2002/153%20Cigarette%20warning%20labels%20studied,%20July%2024,%202002.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Luther Terry Was the Surgeon General of
Words: 2222 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

Luther Terry was the Surgeon General of the United States during the Kennedy Administration and the first part of the Johnson Administration, from 1961 to 1965. Terry changed the nature of the office, which until that time was obscure enough so that many Americans did not know there was such a post. Since Terry's time, and specifically because of one important action he took, the office of Surgeon General has

Tobacco Industry History of Tobacco Ancient Times
Words: 5517 Length: 15 Document Type: Research Paper

Tobacco Industry History of Tobacco Ancient Times Fifteenth Century Sixteenth Century Seventeenth Century Eighteenth Century Nineteenth Century Twentieth Century Modern Times Corporate Stakeholders Ethics & Social Values Ecology & Natural Resources Saint Leo Core Values Throughout its long and storied history, tobacco has served the various appetites of religious shamans, aristocratic noblemen, common sailors, money changers and modern-day captains of industry. The aeromatic plant grew naturally in the moderate climates of the Americas and was transported to every corner of the world by seagoing

Tobacco Industry: Where Business Meets
Words: 5112 Length: 17 Document Type: Research Proposal

Although it is expected to die in Congress -- and President Bush has promised a veto if it does not -- a bill is currently circulating that would allow the FDA to control cigarette contents ("Reynolds American" 2008). If this bill were to pass, and the likelihood of it doing so is much greater with a Democratic congress and president, it could mean the perpetual death of the tobacco

Smoking Ban Tobacco Smoke Should Certainly Be
Words: 1586 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Smoking Ban Tobacco smoke should certainly be considered a toxic chemical, and its risks to human health have been well-known for decades. Any reasonable person -- or indeed anyone who is even slightly familiar with the medical and scientific evidence -- would certainly know this today. Forty years ago, the federal government banned tobacco advertising from radio and television and put warning labels on tobacco products, while class action lawsuits have

Deception of the Tobacco Industry
Words: 3795 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

Deception of the Tobacco Industry Smoking is a factor, and an important factor, in the production of carcinoma in the lung," wrote Richard Doll and Bradford Hill some fifty years ago. It was this first study which would initiate all others. It was this first study which would be expanded and eventually establish smoking as a major health risk linking it to problems including everything from heart disease to bronchitis,

Business Law the 1988 and Later 1992
Words: 957 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Business Law The 1988 and later 1992 Supreme Court decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. illustrates the functions and role of law in business and public health. This case relates to the tobacco industry's culpability in promoting smoking through marketing campaigns after knowledge of the detrimental effects of smoking, and in spite of the mandatory Surgeon General Warning labels that had been federally mandated since the 1960s and the Federal

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now