• Home
  • /
  • Topic
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Supreme Court
  • /
  • Supreme Court of Mississippi Cash Distributing Company Inc. V. James Neely Case Study
Verified Document

Supreme Court Of Mississippi Cash Distributing Company, Inc. V. James Neely Case Study

Supreme Court of Mississippi. CASH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. James NEELY. Facts

In 1973, James Neely started working for Cash Distributing Co., a company that distributed Anheuser-Busch products in several parts of the United States. The company had offices in Columbus, Starkville and Tupelo. During the 1990s, James Neely was heading the Columbus office. By this time, Anheuser-Busch started to look more closely at the way some of its rules were enforced, something that was not traditionally the practice in the past, when the company was more informal about these procedures. The company's new CEO, Danny Cash, also aimed to properly enforce these new rules and regulations.

However, James Neely refused to abide by all these new regulations, particularly since, throughout his career with the company, these had never been required. As a consequence, in March 2000, Neely was dismissed and replaced as the head of the Columbus office by another employee who was much younger than Neely (38 years old at the time).

Neely sued the company, claiming that the reason for his dismissal was age and age discrimination, something that was federally prohibited. According to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), specific discrimination actions are prohibited, including discrimination in termination of employment and layoffs.

Neely won the trial court, but the Cash Distributing Company appealed, claiming that "Neely...

This basically meant that the company's case was based on the idea that Neely was actually laid off because of other reasons than age, namely his incapacity to perform according to the regulations that the company had imposed. As a consequence, their case implied that Neely had to rebut all these allegations in order to support his own case that it was age discrimination that led to his being laid off. Neely also appealed, asking for additional damages. [1: Cash Distributing Company Inc. Vs. James Neely. On the Internet at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ms-supreme-court/1112377.html. Last retrieved on February 4, 2014]
The Court of Appeals reaffirmed the decision from the trial court's in favor of Neely. As to Neely's cross-appeal, it was partly affirmed and partly remanded by the Court of Appeals. Thus, Neely received an additional $58,754. Three judges from the Court of Appeals dissented, pointing out that there was no direct evidence of age discrimination, despite several memos written by the company CEO that contained age-related comments.

In discussing this case, there are several elements that need to be taken into consideration. These include the specific conditions provided by the ADEA and referring to age discrimination; the evaluations of Neely's activity with the company; and any potential evidence of age discrimination, including in…

Sources used in this document:
Bibliography

1. Cash Distributing Company Inc. Vs. James Neely. On the Internet at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ms-supreme-court/1112377.html. Last retrieved on February 4, 2014

2. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. http://finduslaw.com/age-discrimination-employment-act-1967-adea-29-us-code-chapter-14. Last retrieved on February 4, 2014

3. http://law.justia.com/cases/Mississippi/court-of-appeals/2006/co31449.html. Last retrieved on February 4, 2014
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court and Public Opinion the Supreme
Words: 1479 Length: 4 Document Type: Thesis

Supreme Court and Public Opinion The Supreme Court of the United States was established in 1789 as part of the basic three sections of the American governmental system: Executive (President and Staff), Legislative (Congress), and Judicial (Supreme Court System). Each U.S. State also has a supreme court, which is the highest law for interpreting cases that move into that jurisdiction. Essentially, the Supreme Court has the ultimate jurisdiction over all federal

Supreme Court Case: According to
Words: 1051 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,

Supreme Court Cases Muller V. Oregon Women's
Words: 1601 Length: 5 Document Type: Thesis

Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the

Supreme Court Case
Words: 907 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was an extremely important one, and one which set a significant precedent in the United States that would not be overturned until the Brown v. Board of Education decision in the middle of the 20th century. The former case set the precedent for what was known as the separate but equal doctrine. The principle question considered in this case was

Supreme Court Summary Case: Snyder V. Phelps
Words: 533 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Summary Case: Snyder v. Phelps Docket Number: 09-751 Petitioner: Albert Snyder Respondent: Fred W. Phelps, Sr. Facts of the Case: The family members of Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder filed a lawsuit against the members of the Westboro Baptist Church of Louisiana. The members of the church had picketed at Snyder's funeral. The family alleged that the church members were guilty of defamation, invasion of privacy, and intentionally inflicting emotional distress to the Snyders.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now