Verified Document

Supreme Court In Many Respects, Research Paper

Wade decision was morally wrong and strongly believed that it should, and could, be overturned. Other Americans, however, continued to just as strongly support the Roe v. Wade original decision. They had a deep moral belief that a woman should not be coerced by the country's law to bear a child if, for what she believes the reason, to do so. Having a child is a private or family decision as the U.S. Supreme Court's noted in its decision in1973 Thus, in 1992, both sides of the issue were concerned when the ruling once again went to the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood V Casey, this time with a new justice makeup. Sandra Day O'Connor and David Souter were retired. The Court circulated an opinion upholding what was called the core of Roe but making it easier for states to regulate abortions. According to "Oyez," the Pennsylvania legislature had amended its abortion control law in 1988 and 1989 with the new provisions that the law required informed consent and a 24-hour waiting period before to the procedure. In addition, a minor wanting an abortion needed the consent of one parent and a married woman had to indicate that she notified her husband of her intention to abort the fetus. Several abortion clinics and physicians challenged these new provisions. A federal appeals court upheld all the provisions except for the husband notification requirement. The question thus was posed: "Can a state require women who want an abortion to obtain informed consent, wait 24 hours, and, if minors, obtain parental consent, without violating their right...

Wade?"
The ruling of Planned Parenthood V Casey, reaffirming Roe v Wade was very noteworthy, since it showed that the Court could maintain its earlier decisions. However, even more noteworthy were the actions of Stevens. The vote came down to a very derisive 5-to-4 decision, the Court again reaffirming Roe, but upholding most of the Pennsylvania provisions. For the first time, the justices imposed a new standard to decide validity of laws to restrict abortions: Whether a state abortion regulation has the purpose or effect of imposing an "undue burden," which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability" (Oyez). Under this standard, the only provision to fail the undue-burden test was the husband notification requirement. The Court opinion was unique: Three justices crafted and authored it. When receiving the draft of the three middle-ground justices, Stevens suggested a reorganization of their opinion so that he and Blackman could join most of it and there would be a single opinion that was supported by a court majority. Justices O'Connor, Kennedy and Souter quickly agreed, and the opinion became the law of the land (Totenberg, 2010). Reflecting back on these days, Stevens says with the more conservative court, it is much more difficult now to find a consensus. However, with his retirement and a new justice, the makeup will change again.

Sources used in this document:
References:

Oyez. Planned Parenthood V Casey Website accessed April 10, 2010. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_744

Stanton, S.S. (2005) Since Roe V Wade: American Public Opinion and Law on Abortion. CSA

Website accessed April 10, 2010. http://www.csa.com/discoveryguides/roe/overview.php

Totenberg, N.(April 9, 2010) For Decades, Stevens Molded High Court Rulings. Website accessed April 11, 2010 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123075821
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court of Mississippi Cash Distributing Company, Inc. V. James...
Words: 875 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

Supreme Court of Mississippi. CASH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. James NEELY. Facts In 1973, James Neely started working for Cash Distributing Co., a company that distributed Anheuser-Busch products in several parts of the United States. The company had offices in Columbus, Starkville and Tupelo. During the 1990s, James Neely was heading the Columbus office. By this time, Anheuser-Busch started to look more closely at the way some of its rules were enforced,

Supreme Court Justices
Words: 620 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Justices Chief Justice John G. Roberts Biography John Glover Roberts Jr. was born on January 27, 1955, in Buffalo, New York. Roberts grew up with three sisters, Kathy, Peggy, and Barbara and his mother Rosemary. His father, John Sr., a plant manager at Bethlehem Steel, moved the family to Long Beach, Indiana, when Roberts was in fourth grade. After grade school Roberts attended La Lumiere School, a Roman Catholic boarding school

Supreme Court
Words: 1086 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Justice Antonin Scalia's philosophy and contributions to the US Supreme Court, and the effect of his demise on the Court, particularly on Amendments IV, V, VI and VIII. Philosophy and Impact of the Death of Scalia Owing to Justice Scalia's disruptive nature, a number of impolite social media posts, op-eds and tweets are expected from parties who were usually not in agreement with his philosophy. Despite the presence of other "conservative" Justices,

Supreme Court Decisions the Nature
Words: 2427 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

For example, he voted to require that schools utilize resources to support religions activities if they designate resources to non-religious activities (Board of Education. v. Mergens, 1990). Further, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) called for vouchers to be given to families of low socioeconomic standing for both religious and secular educational institutions. This being said, Rehnquist was not able to completely disrupt the social change that Warren had started in

Supreme Court Case Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Vs. City of Hialeah...
Words: 819 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Religious Freedom-First Amendment Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah Religious Freedom is one of the key principles on which the foundation of our country was laid. United States has always supported and endorsed free exercise of religion and this right has been considered so important that it became part of the First Amendment, which clearly states that: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

Supreme Court the Justices of
Words: 3127 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Tribe refers to what Ronald Dworkin says later in the book. Dworkin holds that everyone is an originalist now but that they are not seeking what the lawmakers expected but what they meant to say in their law, suggesting perhaps that they may not be writing laws as clearly as could be or that the vagaries of language often make it difficult to do so without some form of

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now