Verified Document

Supreme Court Case Research Paper

Supreme Court Case The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was an extremely important one, and one which set a significant precedent in the United States that would not be overturned until the Brown v. Board of Education decision in the middle of the 20th century. The former case set the precedent for what was known as the separate but equal doctrine. The principle question considered in this case was whether or not segregation -- a distinction between facilities, services and treatment of people -- could be lawfully determined based on race. Prior to the Supreme Court's ruling on this case, the state of Louisiana passed a law known as the Separate Car Act which mandated that African-American and Caucasian passengers in the railroad system had to sit in different cars based on their race. There was no federal consensus on this law, which had merely operated at the state level. The Supreme Court's decision on this matter, then, set the precedent for segregation as lawful throughout the country in many walks of life extending well beyond the railroad system and which would pertain to such areas as schools, water fountains, restaurants, hotels, and many others.

The central issue within this particular case was whether or not the Separate Car Act was constitutional. In helping to determine this fact, there was a considerable degree of scrutiny of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution....

The former officially forbid slavery, whereas the latter implied a degree of equality among African-American citizens and freed slaves, among other things (such as the fact that those born in the U.S. were citizens). The legal team for Plessy argued that the act did violate these amendments (especially the Fourteenth), while the legal team for Ferguson argued that these Amendments did not prevent any sort of separation of the races.
It was of extreme interest to both parties and to businesses, corporations, and governmental entities throughout the country, therefore, when the Supreme Court sided with Ferguson. The rationale behind its decision was fairly simple -- if the facilities issued in the case of a distinction between the races were inherently equal, then there was no transgression of the Constitution or of the aforementioned amendments. Specifically, the court ruled that if everything in distinct facilities occupied between Caucasians and African-Americans was the same, then there was no injustice served. The assumption of such rationale was the fact that there could in fact be equality between the races despite the fact that they were separate from one another. Again, it is noteworthy to mention the fact that more than half a century later, this ruling would be overturned due to the apparent inequality in the distinct facilities between African-Americans and Caucasians.

It is…

Sources used in this document:
References

Wormser, R. (2002). Plessy v. Ferguson. www.pbs.org. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_plessy.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,

Supreme Court Case: According to
Words: 1051 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement

Supreme Court Cases Muller V. Oregon Women's
Words: 1601 Length: 5 Document Type: Thesis

Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the

Supreme Court Cases Douglas V.
Words: 629 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

7. Sester v. United States - Docket No., 10-7387 -- The question is whether a district court has authority to order a federal sentence to run consecutive to an anticipated, but not-yet-imposed, state sentence ? 8. Williams v. Illinois - Docket No., 10-8505 -- The question is whether a state rule of evidence allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing performed by non-testifying analysts, where the

Supreme Court Case
Words: 1082 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

long-term impact of Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. This will be accomplished by: studying the parties involved, discussing the facts of the case, identifying the constitutional issues, examining the decision in terms of the vote, the opinion of the court, the dissenting views and the significance of the case. Once this takes place, is when we can provide specific insights that will illustrate how this will affect

Supreme Court Cases Case Briefs
Words: 2082 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

D. joined the Majority. Justices Blackmun, H.A. And Powell, L.F. wrote a special and regular concurrence respectively. In addition to voting with the majority, O'Connor S.D. joined Powel's concurrence. Writing Dissenting Opinion(s): Stevens, J.P. filed a dissenting opinion in which Marshall, T. And Brennan, W.J joined. Brennan also filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Marshall T. joined. Case 5 Citation: Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe (2000) Argued: March 29, 2000 Date

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now