Verified Document

Supreme Court Case Research Paper

¶ … long-term impact of Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. This will be accomplished by: studying the parties involved, discussing the facts of the case, identifying the constitutional issues, examining the decision in terms of the vote, the opinion of the court, the dissenting views and the significance of the case. Once this takes place, is when we can provide specific insights that will illustrate how this will affect the way law enforcement is interacting with prisoners. In criminal law, there are those decisions that will have a dramatic impact upon the way law enforcement is interacting with suspects. Sometimes, there are certain cases that will give the police the power to use greater amounts of authority. When this happens, there is a transformation in how different constitutional ideas are interpreted and utilized.

A recent example of this can be seen by looking no further than the Supreme Court case Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. This is focusing on the rights of law enforcement officials to strip search criminal suspects they have in custody. To fully understand the implications of this case requires: studying the parties involved, discussing the facts of the case, identifying the constitutional issues, examining the decision in terms of the vote, the opinion of the court, the dissenting views and the significance of the case. Together, these elements will highlight the long-term implications of this decision. ("Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders," 2011)

Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders (10-945)

The Parties Involved

This case involves the plaintiff (Albert Florence) alleging that the Burlington County Jail and Essex Correctional...

What happened is Florence was arrested in March 2005 on a bench warrant out of Essex County. This was for a delinquent fine that he had paid two days earlier. Yet, the records were not updated to reflect these changes. ("Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders," 2011)
As a result, Florence was arrested and taken to the Burlington Country Jail. This is when he was subject to the first strip search. Once he was transferred to the Essex Correctional Facility, is the point that was forced to go through a second strip search. These tactics were a part of the approved policies and procedures for the Board of Chosen Freeholders (who controlled both facilities). They are the defendant in the case. ("Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders," 2011)

The Facts of the Case

At the heart of his argument, is if having prisoners disrobe in front of corrections officers is a violation of their Fourth Amendment rights (i.e. prohibition of unusual search and seizures). The U.S. District Court in New Jersey determined that this was a violation of the Fourth Amendment. This gave prisoners the right to join together in class action law suits for possible violations. ("Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders," 2011)

However, after reviewing the case on appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals found that blanket prisoner strips searches were not a violation of the Constitution. This is because corrections officers have the right to protect themselves against contraband and possible weapons. When someone is arrested, they automatically fall under this classification (which means that any kinds of strip searches are legal). The Supreme Court…

Sources used in this document:
References

Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. (2011). Cornell University School of Law. Retrieved from: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/10-945

Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. (2011). Oyez. Retrieved from: http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_945

Florence v. The Board of Chosen Freeholders. (2011). Oyez Today. Retrieved from: http://www.oyeztoday.org/news/follow_up_florence_v_board_chosen_freeholders
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Court Case
Words: 907 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was an extremely important one, and one which set a significant precedent in the United States that would not be overturned until the Brown v. Board of Education decision in the middle of the 20th century. The former case set the precedent for what was known as the separate but equal doctrine. The principle question considered in this case was

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in
Words: 1015 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,

Supreme Court Case: According to
Words: 1051 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement

Supreme Court Cases Muller V. Oregon Women's
Words: 1601 Length: 5 Document Type: Thesis

Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the

Supreme Court Cases Douglas V.
Words: 629 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

7. Sester v. United States - Docket No., 10-7387 -- The question is whether a district court has authority to order a federal sentence to run consecutive to an anticipated, but not-yet-imposed, state sentence ? 8. Williams v. Illinois - Docket No., 10-8505 -- The question is whether a state rule of evidence allowing an expert witness to testify about the results of DNA testing performed by non-testifying analysts, where the

Supreme Court Cases Case Briefs
Words: 2082 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

D. joined the Majority. Justices Blackmun, H.A. And Powell, L.F. wrote a special and regular concurrence respectively. In addition to voting with the majority, O'Connor S.D. joined Powel's concurrence. Writing Dissenting Opinion(s): Stevens, J.P. filed a dissenting opinion in which Marshall, T. And Brennan, W.J joined. Brennan also filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Marshall T. joined. Case 5 Citation: Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe (2000) Argued: March 29, 2000 Date

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now