Verified Document

Supreme Court And Health Essay

Adams vs. Uno Restaurants, Inc. Gerald K. Adams, the plaintiff, had been employed by Uno Restaurants, Inc., the defendant, for several years. On March 20, 1996, Adams arrived for his nighttime line cooking shift at Uno Restaurants in Warwick. Few minutes into his shift, Adams noticed that the restaurant's kitchen floor was soaked with a foul-smelling liquid that came from the drains. The plaintiff then complained of illness and went home and then notified the Department of Health regarding the draining issue at the restaurant's kitchen. The department responded through visiting the restaurant and ordering it to be closed that night after discovering the health hazard brought by the drainage problem. When the restaurant reopened the following day after sanitizing the kitchen, the restaurant's manager, David Badot, called Adams into his office and shouted at him while trying to find out whether he informed the Department of Health. Adam shouted back at him and acknowledged that he notified the department about the drainage issue. After the altercation, the plaintiff left the restaurant, was arrested, and ultimately filed a lawsuit against the defendant on the premise that he was illegally dismissed for notifying the Department of Health about the drainage problem. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Adams and awarded him $7,500 in damages based on the Whistleblowers' Protection Act of the state.

The main issue before the Supreme court was to determine whether its unlawful for an employer to react against his/her employee for contacting the Department of Health...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

When determining the case, the Supreme Court utilized the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which is a federal statute requiring employers to establish a safe working environment for employees (FindLaw, n.d.). Based on this law, employers are required to establish a working environment that is free of dangerous conditions that could harm the health and safety of employees. The main objective of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (1970) is to protect employees from unfavorable working conditions and environments that endanger their health and safety. In this regard, employers are required to establish health and safety standards relating to their specific kind of workplace and nature of organizational operations. Additionally, the law empowers employees and their representatives to file complaints with relevant authorities against their employers if there is a serious health and/or safety hazard within the workplace. Employees have the right to file…

Sources used in this document:
References

FindLaw. (n.d.). Protecting Yourself from Unsafe Working Conditions. Retrieved May 13, 2017, from http://employment.findlaw.com/workplace-safety/protecting-yourself-from-unsafe-working-conditions.html

Guerin, L. (n.d.). Workplace Retaliation: What Are Your Rights? Retrieved May 13, 2017, from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/workplace-retaliation-employee-rights-30217.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Supreme Courts Decisions Regargding the
Words: 653 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Components of this act that have been targeted towards advanced nursing practitioners include a lifting of the limits for how much money can be spent on doctoral programs for nurses (No author, 2011). Most advanced practice nurses have a master's degree; the removal of the cap for funding for doctoral programs will almost certainly allow these professionals to complete more doctoral degrees, increase their breadth of knowledge, and provide

Supreme Court Cases Muller V. Oregon Women's
Words: 1601 Length: 5 Document Type: Thesis

Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the

Supreme Court in Many Respects,
Words: 1125 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Three decades following the original Court decision, many Americans continued to believe that the Roe v. Wade decision was morally wrong and strongly believed that it should, and could, be overturned. Other Americans, however, continued to just as strongly support the Roe v. Wade original decision. They had a deep moral belief that a woman should not be coerced by the country's law to bear a child if, for

Supreme Court and the Constitution
Words: 2450 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

That's why I am instructing my Administration to get to work immediately with Congress on this issue. We are going to talk with bipartisan Congressional leaders to develop a forceful response to this decision. The public interest requires nothing less. Eight justices did concur that Congress has the responsibility to require corporations to disclose their spending and to run disclaimers with their advertisements, for "disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to

Supreme Court International Union, UAW
Words: 768 Length: 2 Document Type: Case Study

Johnson Controls, Inc. (886 F.2d 871 (7th Cir. 1989). The Supreme Court heard this case because they were concerned with an employer's gender-based fetal-protection policy. The question was whether an employer could exclude a fertile female employee from certain jobs because of its concern for the health of the fetus the woman might conceive. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court struck down the employer's fetal protection policy as violation

Supreme Court and Law
Words: 713 Length: 2 Document Type: Creative Writing

Branches When it comes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, all three branches of the United States government play their own role when it comes to this enacted legislation. Beyond that, the idea of federalism and federal supremacy clearly come into play given that the states are largely at the mercy and whim of what the federal government mandates. Even with that, the individual parts of the government

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now