Career Development Program Juveniles in Gangs
The intervention plan provides various professional and organizational insights on the program and facilitation service. The program recognizes the relevance of initiating capacity, professionalism and skills of the persons involved while contributing towards the achievement of the strategic priorities and goals. The programs provide consultative information and services for the units of planning, team development and implementation of change processes (Bradshaw, et al., 2013). The system coordinates training in the correctional units. The medium-term goals of the project include providing advice and support for the application and development of staff and organizational development initiatives. The suite of program components will build on professional capabilities, leadership and management skills, organizational knowledge and team performance and development.
Literature Review
Various authors have literature on correctional systems. The practical approaches in gang situations include the need to address service delivery problems. The programs involve different stakeholders and groups that handle facets of such local gang problems while focusing on intervention, prevention, and suppression. The collaborative approaches have inherent barriers that affect the success of the elements. The systems also include the definition of gang problems, successful formation collaborations, discernment of ends and means and the determination of impact. The diversity of groups and their activities influence the focus on communities with trouble definitions and recognition of gang problems. The inability to define gang problems come from the absence of both national and local consensus along the fundamental groups and harm inflicted. The models describe gang-related problems within the harmful incidents occurring in communities. There are similarities in the ways that cause more concern to members of the public (The EMT Group. (n.d.).
The agencies or groups work to address gang issues and facilitate coordination. The organizations or groups handling gang problems undertake respective roles while advancing on the essentials of their actions and coordination of management groups as comprised of representatives and participating agencies. Management groups guide such agencies in immediate functions and responsibilities for accuracy in responding to various gang issues. The concept upon which community will address gang problems is different regarding events drawing public attention to gang menace issues. In other cases, high-profile and often tragic events occur through galvanization of communities and stimulation of mobilized gang activities. The groundswell of public support in dealing with the gang issues builds gradually. The lack of individuals and agencies serving as catalysts inhibits the processes (Anonymous, 2004).
Key organizations and community leaders, start inducing open discussions and addressing gang issues. The standing task forces, committees, and organizational structures refer to the steering committees through a convened state of working steps. The groups oversee the assessments of local gang problems using data acquired through evaluation and development of sustainable strategies. Suppression activities in corrective actions include a direction to have increased police patrols, community awareness, community policing, support for the law enforcement intelligence sharing. The policy fosters the establishment of multiagency law requirements coupled with prosecution responses targeting gang leaders. This increases the scope of school resource officers within target areas. The expansion of neighborhoods enables teams to partner with Police Departments and other community members. The programs should support police department in the review of crime data and other evaluation concepts (Vigil, 2003).
Theoretical Foundation
The program's application approach refers to the social disorganization theory. The theory considers all aspects of gang involvement as alternative avenues for the youth lacking other social connectedness to have community and personal institutions. The absence of such connectedness originates from various population movements including diverse waves of immigration, rapid political, social, or economic changes, war or revolution, racism, and unstable political regimes. Other variables in the theory include rapid urbanization or industrialization, radical labor market shifts, community fragmentation, family or social disorganization, or failure of socialization agents to meet the changing population's needs (Lonnie, 1999).
Social disorganization theory stresses that the process of gang formation is typical and rational responses should be fronted to address abnormal social situations. Social disorganization theory insists that bands originate from the effort of youths seeking to create societies for themselves. The groupings cater to their needs where other forums failed to exist. The serration of gangs in obtaining life satisfaction and rewards within the schools, families, and communities failed to avail. The prominent social disorganization theories use official topographic maps and police statistics in explaining the gang formation and delinquency occurring in areas of city centers. The area has varied states of social flux with a show of individuals living in the area. Crime rates remain constant in the course of time...
Studies indicate that "... A higher than average incidence of delinquency occurs among youngsters of the poorest social standing and with the lowest performance at school..." (Jarvelin et al., 1994, p. 230) Similarly, studies also note that neighborhood influences on development was determinant on factors such as "...collective socialization, peer-group influence, and institutional capacity." (Sampson, Morenoff & Gannon-Rowley, 2002. p 443) Generally studies like the above present a negative picture of
Findings revealed the importance of early intervention and other schooling factors in reducing delinquency. They also emphasized the benefits of early intervention as one effective measure in preventing delinquency (Mann & Reynolds). The study established the connection between a large-scale preschool program and reductions in the incidence, frequency and severity of juvenile crime (Mann & Reynolds, 2006). The connection is between early social functioning and severe behavioral problems. Social functioning
What is significant about youth court is that the attorneys, jurors and even the judges are themselves adolescents and many times former defendants (Butts, Hoffman & Buck, 1999). The foundational premise or ideology behind youth courts is that the youth's judgment from their peer cohorts may be more convincing and in the long run beneficial than judgment handed down by officials and adults in the judicial system. Because many
Juvenile Delinquency Crime statistics from Chicago, Illinois testify to the increasing number of youth offenders. In 1989, the Chicago police reported that 64% of 274,000 their crimes were committed by individuals under the age of 25; 40% of these crimes were committed by teenagers under 18." (Malmgren, Abbott, & Hawkins, 1999) The recent headlines show that more and more kids are being expelled from schools for carrying guns, knives and for
Dugan: Should be on its own page. Juvenile recidivism is a prevalent problem in the criminal justice system. Tackling reoffending remains a complex task requiring several strategies and aims. It involves research, acknowledgement of causes, factors, exploration, and evaluation of subgroups to generate long-term, positive changes in the lives of juvenile offenders. From gang violence to Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP), researchers discover some of the reasons why juveniles
Relevance Juvenile offenders and reoffenders are an important problem facing the United States criminal justice system. For more than one hundred years, states held the belief that the juvenile justice system acted as a vehicle to safeguard the public via offering a structure that enables the rehabilitation of children growing into adulthood. States identified the difference of children committing crimes versus adult offenders (Loeber & Farrington, 2012). For example, the states
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now