Strategic Management: Management, Organizational Structure, And Corporate Strategies
Manager, management, and organization
The significance of managers .
Size and strategy of a company
Mission, vision, and corporate strategy
Organizational culture.
In an organizational setting, strategy has always been more of a high stakes game where the management team identifies the company's mission and makes important decisions that focus all the company's capital, resources, and energy towards its attainment. With the dynamic nature of the current business environment, managers need to constantly analyze their internal and external environments to avoid losing their customers to the competition and losing grip of their market share. This text evaluates the importance of managers to an organization, the importance of organizational structure and culture, and the formulation of corporate strategies.
Manager, management, and an organization
To understand the operations in any business environment, it is important define a manager, management, and an organization. An organization can be defined as a group of people that work together in a coordinated and structured manner to achieve a set of goals, which may range from profits, knowledge, social satisfaction, or even national defense. According to Griffin (2013), most people in the United States are born in an organization - a hospital, gain knowledge in an organization - a school, and depend on organizations for an income and sustainability for the rest of their lives.
A manager is the individual is in charge of a particular department or business, whose main function is to oversee the work of others and to make the necessary decisions to ensure that the organization runs smoothly. On the other hand, management is the function that is tasked with the responsibility of coordinating the efforts of all the managers and employees in the organization, with the aim of accomplishing the set objectives and goals. Some of the management's activities include planning, leading, organizing, motivating, staffing, coordinating, controlling, and delegating duties to managers and employees accordingly (Montana and Charnov, 2008).
The significance of managers in achieving organizational success
Managers are an indispensable part of any organization because they greatly contribute towards maximizing efficiency and achievement of the organizations goals. Take the company Google, Inc. For example. Google believes that its managers have the greatest impact on the performance of employees and how satisfied they are with their work. The company even went ahead to start a project dubbed project oxygen in an attempt to establish something that would have a greater impact on their future; not a new app or algorithm, but building better bosses. Some of the ways managers contribute to organizational success are:
They formulate strategies and initiate action
Managers are able to get work done by communicating what needs to be done and guiding the employees in doing it. They are able to identify new opportunities and putting the necessary plans in place for their implementation. At Google, managers are expected to have a clear vision and strategy for their teams. They play a big part in keeping them focused on the main goals and helping them progress towards their attainment
They solve problems
Problems are bound to occur in the day-to-day activities of any organization, and employees need people who will help them get through certain roadblocks. Managers are often equipped with the required problem solving skills and they reduce time wastage which might otherwise affect the productivity of the organization. Google requires their managers to have the necessary skills to help their teams when they need them and they are also required to use their seniority to remove certain barriers that may come up.
They motivate employees and provide guidance
When employees are motivated by the managers, they are more satisfied with their jobs, which increases their performance and productivity, and ultimately leads to better organizational performance. Managers at Google get to know their employees out of work and often strive to make them feel appreciated. They also have regular one-on-one sessions with the teams and they offer tailor made solutions to their problems, which also highlights each employee's strengths. This is why Google is known as one of the best in terms of employee satisfaction, a factor that has contributed greatly to its success.
They coordinate the employees' efforts
Every manager at Google is responsible for their team. They are expected to be results oriented and productive at all times in order to channel the employees' efforts towards achievement of organizations goals. When managers reconcile the organization's interest with the personal interests of the employees, there is bound to be more productivity and better performance.
How the size and strategy of a company...
MANAGING ORGANIZATION'S STRUCTURE Managing the Organization's Structure; McDonald's case study McDonald's represents the biggest fast food chain in the world, with its key products being burgers, soft drinks, French fries, desserts and shakes. Increasing health consciousness and trends against obesity have called attention to the company, which, by all accounts, has contributed majorly to rapid growth of obesity in its customers. Foods marketed by the company (all fast foods, in fact) are
Strategic Management The concept of strategic management is one that is highly important to organizations around the world (David, 2009). It involves taking a look at the top management of a company and the resources that management team is using on behalf of the company's owners and in order to show a specific level of performance. The mission, vision, and objectives of the organization must be examined, and it is necessary
Organizational Structure There is one structural issue that will be examined. The hierarchical structure of CI is causing problems that affect the contingency factors most important to the CI organization including, Strategy, Sales cycle, and culture (Cengage, 2010). In the case study, Daly has assessed internal and external weaknesses and threats due to strategic direction. The analysis reveals two internal threats to the organization that stem from the hierarchical organizational structure and
Strategic Management Plan Anheuser-Busch Inbev Strategic Management Plan for Anheuser-Busch Inbev Division For North America Faced with increasing price competition on their mid- and low-end brands globally combined with consolidation occurring at a quickening pace across the larger brands and breweries, the Anheuser-Busch Inbev Division needs to move quickly to stabilize its market position. Doing nothing will lead to the company falling quickly behind smaller, more agile competitors who have unique supply chains
Resolution often needs to be imposed from above. A third type of communication problem at firms operating a matrix structure is that of corporate culture clash. In the case of Spectrum, the regional head office may wish to impose upon the different product functions the head office corporate culture. Each of the functional firms, however, may have its own culture and may find that it benefits from certain cultural differences.
In conclusion, these two books and their related concepts show how critical it is for a strategist to consider both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of a business model. There must be a balance of the tasks and vision ownership to the overall measured results of strategies as well. Both books together forma strong foundation for long-term planning that takes into account the need for change management at the executive
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now