Change management initiatives of HP, IBM, Kodak, and McDonald's
Kotter's Model
Although it is said that the only constant in business is change, the need for change has thwarted many potential corporate superstars of the recent past, including Hewlett Packard, IBM, Kodak, and McDonald's. Although these companies were able to deal with the changes demanded by exterior economic circumstances and internal corporate pressures with varying degrees of success, all met with roadblocks on their way to pursuing change. Kotter's model for successful change suggests that all change entails a certain amount of urgency; a period of coalition building during the pre-change process; the need to create a vision for the change; communicating that vision; removing obstacles; creating short-term wins; building on the change; and permanently anchoring that change in the corporation's culture (Kotter's 8-step change model, 2013, Mind Tools).
HP: Three significant errors
However, in the case of HP, critical errors were made during the change process. The first and most serious one was creating insufficient urgency about the need for change: when HP merged with fellow computer company Compaq, significant organizational players were resistant to the merger, dooming it from the start. Rather than building coalitions, HP CEO Carly Fiorina strong-armed the merger with little concern about generating buy-in amongst other members of the company. Her reorganization of company divisions also generated resistance and even though her principles for doing so were sound, she did not clearly communicate her vision for why this was necessary.
Recommendation
Creating goodwill by proceeding more slowly with the merger (or not undertaking it at all if there was profound organizational resistance and instead attempting to improve what was wrong with HP alone) would have been the wiser task in hindsight.
Change image
HP's strong-armed model of change ultimately failed to generate buy-in
IBM: Three significant errors
In the case of the stalwart computer company IBM, IBM was initially slow to react to the development of the Internet. However, as a result of internal...
Kodak and Fujifilm The history and core business of Kodak and Fujifilm Kodak and Fujifilm have been the most popular companies in the history of U.S. And world photography industry. Little is known about the history and the existing rivalry between the two companies over the years. Both companies have intriguing historical backgrounds; how they began and how they continue to grow and challenge one another in the industry. Fujifilm was set
It is common sense for a company to lower their costs when they are aware of the upcoming losses from the market. Unfortunately, Kodak was slow to realize that where Fujifilm adapted to it quite quickly, After many power changes, the eventual leader Shigetaka Komori put the company on the right path. The restructuring and the remodeling plan that he started, he basically went onto lay off people and cut down
Kodak's Digital Strategy It is very notable to mention how Kodak experienced a downfall with the emergence of digital imaging. Kodak's stock fell from about 80 USD to 3 USD within a period of less than ten years. The number of employees also declined. In 1988, the company employed about 140,000 employees but currently it has employees of not more than 20,000. This was as an unavoidable challenge and Kodak used
The company finds itself having to try to attract talented people, but without the cash or desirable location (sorry, Rochester) to attract the best talent. Further, there is perpetual uncertainty about the future of the company. Thus, reinventing itself as an innovator has proven to be a much greater challenge for Kodak than it has been for Fujifilm. Part of the problem was the conservative culture at Kodak, and
Kodak, long dominant in the photography business, has struggled with the transition to digital technology. Beginning in the 1980s, the company saw a number of strategic shifts. The company is now faced with four potential paths ahead, each one representing a different strategic view of the company and the industry. This paper will first present some historical context to Kodak's current situation, and then discuss the different strategic options in
" (Tully, 2004 p. 61) Though die hard print photography lovers, mostly professional photographers who do much of their own developing, may complain about the rapid advances of digital technology, as they are still set in the abilities of the print film technology to do things digital cannot yet the decision made in 2004 proved wise. There may be a time in the future when some of these changes can
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now