Verified Document

Stock Valuation The Stock That I Chose Term Paper

Stock Valuation The stock that I chose is PepsiCo. I was drinking a Pepsi when I was thinking about a stock to do, and it just seemed like a good idea. That is why I picked the stock, but PepsiCo (PEP on the NYSE) is a major blue chip stock so there is no reason why I shouldn't pick it. The current stock price of PepsiCo is $85.31

PepsiCo is in the food and beverage industry. They manufacture, bottle and distribute mostly soft drinks and snacks. According to the annual report, the company is split 51% food and 49% beverage and has the same split for U.S. revenue and non-U.S. revenue. Two-thirds of the company's business comes from the Americas. Frito-Lay is the major food company and Pepsi is the major beverage company. The company also owns Quaker Oats, which is the owner of Gatorade and Tropicana. This is considered the "healthy" part of the PepsiCo portfolio.

The overall economy can be measured using data from various agencies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics highlights a 7.6% unemployment rate and 0.5% consumer price index (CPI) meaning that unemployment is fairly high, but lower than it has been. Inflation is fairly low, but higher than it has been. These are signs of a growing economy, in particular one that is recovering from a slowdown. The Bureau of Economic Analysis covers the GDP figures, and indicates an increase of 1.8%, which is a fairly slow rate of increase. Worse, personal income only increased 0.5% in May, 2013. This figure is more important for PepsiCo, because it sells to consumers and it sells discretionary products. The more personal income people have, the more money they will have to waste on soda and chips. However, if the economy is growing, that will help. There is also a lot of growth in emerging economies, something that PepsiCo is trying to get involved with. However, two-thirds of their money comes from the Americas so that is the most important.

Strengths and Weaknesses of PepsiCo

PepsiCo is a major player in the food and beverage industry. It is either a market share leader or the number two in many categories. PepsiCo has mainly a strength with respect to the economy. PepsiCo's products are discretionary purchases, so the company can expect to see improving sales if personal income in particular rises. The economy right now is not strong per se, but it is improving, and Pepsi remains well-positioned to take advantage of this. The company is also working to take advantage of growth in emerging markets.

Pepsi has a very good position in the industry, usually number one or two in any given market. Interbrand ranks Pepsi as the 22nd best brand in the world. This is a source of strength, but Coke is #1 so only a moderate strength. It is great that everybody has heard of Pepsi and respects the company, but ideally it would have a better brand than its major competitor. That said, Pepsi is much stronger than any other competitor. This gives it several advantages in the market. Consumers know the brands, so brand extensions are easier. Distribution is easy -- it is not hard to convince retailers to take on new products or give more space to existing products because they have established sales. Further, competition is often dissuaded from entering markets where very strong players already exist. Few would dare to take on Pepsi (and Coke) head to head, and the same can be said for Frito-Lay, which is a dominate snack company.

At the firm level, PepsiCo has recently completed a restructuring to give it more strength. It bought key distributors to bring them back in house. This deal a few years ago was intended to "save money and get new products to market more quickly" (Fredrix, 2010). This flexibility is a strength. Another strength lies in PepsiCo's brands, which are highly valuable and well-recognized. The company also seems to have strong management and marketing that have allowed it to have such good market position and billions in sales. The competitive position might be one weakness, but Pepsi may also seek to improve innovation and efficiency. These two areas are ones where Pepsi can make improvements.

Valuation Methods

To determine whether or not PepsiCo is a growth company or not is the first step. Regression of the revenues shows significant growth in the past five years. However, most of that growth came from purchasing its bottlers in the U.S. The past couple of years with economic recovery have barely seen any growth in PepsiCo's earnings so it makes sense that this is not really a growth stock. It merely gained revenue by investing in its own business. Thus, the constant dividend growth model will be used as the first valuation method.

The constant dividend growth model is based on the idea that the company's...

If the company is not a growth stock, then the future cash flows are mostly going to come from the dividends, and any growth that there is in those dividends. No reasonable investor would pay for growth that may never come to pass.
The formula for the constant growth dividend discount model is

P = dividend / (discount rate -- growth rate)

For PepsiCo, the current dividend is $2.13 per share. The growth rate can be understood from looking at past dividends and the average growth rate of these:

Table 1 Dividends

2012

2011

2010

2009

Dividends

2.13

2.03

1.89

1.78

Dividend Growth

4.9%

7.4%

6.1%

7.8%

This gives an average dividend growth in the past five years of 6.6%. The next step is to determine the discount rate for the company. This would be done using CAPM and the WACC. For CAPM it is assumed that the risk free rate is the one year Treasury rate, which is 0.15%. The market risk premium is 7%. The beta for PepsiCo is 0.48. These figures are then used to price out the cost of equity for PepsiCo:

Cost of Equity = Risk free rate + Beta*Market Risk Premium

= 0.15 + 3.36 = 3.51%.

Then the cost of debt is determined. Pepsi just issued bonds a couple of days ago, and it was noted that yield of PepsiCo debt is 0.88% at this time for 2016 bonds (Gangar, 2013). Then to complete the WACC calculation, the capital structure of Pepsi needs to be taken into account:

Weighted average cost of capital = weight of debt * cost of debt + weight of equity * cost of equity

WACC = (.702)(.88) + (.298)(3.51) = .6177 + 1.045 = 1.66%

The WACC is then used in the constant growth dividend discount model:

2.13 / (1.66 -- 6.6) = 0.

The conclusion here is that Pepsi is overvalued. The dividends are growing at a faster rate than the discount rate. This situation reflects that Pepsi has a lot of debt, but also that its cost of capital is very low. With interest rates at very low levels, Pepsi borrows at a very low rate. However, its cost of equity is lower than the dividend growth rate. The company has grown its dividends rapidly in the past five years, probably because the stock price has not been growing. However, since the stock price delivered by the dividend discount model is not higher than the current stock price, this indicates that Pepsi is probably overvalued.

Another valuation model is the residual income model. The residual income is the net income less the cost of equity. The net income for Pepsi is $6.178 billion. The cost of equity is 3.51% as outlined in the section on the dividend discount model. The total equity outstanding is $22.417 billion. So the residual income is $6.178 - $.786 = $5.392 billion. The next step in this method is to take the book value of the firm and to it add the present value of the expected future residual income:

BV + PV (EFRI)

$22.417 + (5.392/0.0166) = $347 billion. There are 1.544 billion shares outstanding, so the value of a share by this method would be $224.74. The residual income method is best for companies that are not turning a profit and do not pay dividends, neither of which apply to PepsiCo.

The next three methods of valuation are similar, in that they equate the current level of valuation with past levels. These are price/earnings, price/cash flow and price/sales. The historic levels of these valuations are applied to expectations of next year's levels for these figures. The following table outlines the projected valuation by each of these three methods.

Table 2 - Valuations

Pepsi

Avg level

Current

Next Year

Price Next Year

P/E

18.9

3.96

3.955

$74.75

P/CF

13.2

$72.62

P/S

2.2

65492

69319

$98.77

The average P/E ratio was taken for the past five years. The average P/CF level was taken for two years, because of the fundamental change relating to the purchase of the distributors two years ago. The P/S level average is for the past 7 years to account for the dip of the recession.

The P/E ratio and P/CF ratio both show that PepsiCo is overvalued somewhat, that it's expected values are going to be lower than the current stock price. The P/S ratio analysis shows that PepsiCo is undervalued relative to expected future sales…

Sources used in this document:
References

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Main page retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/

Bureau of Economic Analysis. Main page retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/

Fredrix, E. (2010). PepsiCo to buy bottlers in deals totaling $7.8b. ABC News. Accessed July 27, 2013 from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=8248142&page=1

Gangar, S. (2013). Pepsi raises $1.7 billion in fixed, floating-rate bond offering. Bloomberg. Retrieved July 27, 2013 from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-25/pepsi-said-to-offer-1-7-billion-of-bonds-in-two-part-sale-2-.html
Interbrand: Best Global Brands. Retrieved from http://www.interbrand.com/en/best-global-brands/2012/Best-Global-Brands-2012-Brand-View.aspx
US Department of the Treasury. Main page retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Stock Is an Attractive Long-Term
Words: 837 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

00. ("Nue Core," 2010) Arcelor Mittal has trailing PE ratio of 23.28 and a forward PE ratio of 7.09. The current ratio is 1.35 and the put call ratio is .55. The price dividend ratio is 45.74, while the beta is 2.70. ("Arcelor Mittal," 2010) Upon doing a side by side comparison, Arcelor Mittal is the strongest company out of three. This is because their PE ratios remained more stable over

Ici Bank: A Growth Stock
Words: 2899 Length: 11 Document Type: Term Paper

Financial Statements One of the most significant factors in the decision to invest in ICICI Bank is to determine the affects of recent capital expenditure and the anticipated return for these investments. Entry into microfinancing represents a considerable amount to risk, due to the financial instability of the target market. The following chart highlights the most significant changes affecting the financial health of ICICI bank that result from expenditures associated with

How Risk, Return and Valuation Correlate
Words: 2526 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

Corporate Finance Valuation, risk and return are closely linked, from different perspectives. Primarily, risk determines, to some degree, the level of returns, while both need to be seriously considered when conduction a valuation. In many occasions, the analysts work with information from the present, creating forecasts about risk and return that allows them to give, with a reasonable probability, expectations about future events. This paper aims to look into more details at

How to Perform Valuations for Municipalities in South Africa
Words: 64599 Length: 254 Document Type: Dissertation

……South African Municipalities Municipal Revenue Loss Reduction through Improved Municipal Valuation Methodologies:Balance Sheet Enhancement of South African Municipalities to Improve Rates and Taxes Revenue GenerationAbstractThis study examines the property valuation process of Municipalities in South Africa and develops a strategy for strengthening that process in order to more efficiently value properties and ultimately to enhance municipal balance sheets and increase revenue streams. This study proposes an innovative valuation method based

Portfolio Management Project
Words: 4930 Length: 17 Document Type: Term Paper

Stock Portfolio Management Project Selected 10 companies Company Symbol purchase date purchase price Apple, Inc. APPL Industry/Sector: Technology/Personal Computer -- Investment Style: Large Growth Brocade BRCD Communications Systems Inc. Industry/Sector: Technology/Data Storage -- Investment Style: Small Growth Joy Global Inc. JOYG Industry/Sector: Farm/Const/Mach -- Investment Style: Large Growth Ctrip.com CTRP Industry/Sector: Consumer Services -- Investment Style: International Gerdau SA GGB Industry/Sector: Steal & Iron -- Investment Style: International Gol Linhas GOL Aereas Inteligentes SA Industry/Sector: Regional Airline -- Investment Style: International Green Mountain GMCR 10/21/2009 Coffee Roasters Inc. Industry/Sector: Processed Pkgd gds -- Investment Style: Small Growth Rio Tinto PLC RTP 10/21 /

Financial and Investment Analysis
Words: 4393 Length: 17 Document Type: Term Paper

Investment Analysis Investing money for the future is one of the key components of creating a secure future, and retirement. While many Americans do not plan for future years, other then a company retirement plan and social security retirement benefits, research shows that when a person takes an active role in their retirement planning, they are more likely to create a future which will support their standard of living after they

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now