Alfred Stieglitz: The Changing Face of Photography Alfred Stieglitz is considered to be one of the primary early definers of the nature of photographic art. His life and career spanned from 1864 to 1946, encompassing the tail end of the Civil War through World War II. "Stieglitz witnessed New York transform from a sleeping giant of cobblestone streets and horse-drawn trolleys to a vibrant symbol of the modern metropolis, with soaring skyscrapers becoming visible emblems of a new age" (American Masters: Alfred Stieglitz). Although photography was well-established as an art form in the 19th century, Stieglitz was one of the first to defend the unique gifts of photography as an expressive medium in and of its own right. When he became the editor of Camera Notes, the journal of the Camera Club of New York, Stieglitz used the platform provided by this "association of amateur photography enthusiasts" to make a claim for the greatness of photography on par with sculpture and painting (Hostetler).

Early attempts at artistic photography attempted to mimic the Impressionists. However, with the rise of 20th century Modernism, "photography was naturally suited to representing the fast-paced cacophony that increasingly defined modern life, and attempting to cloak the medium's natural strengths by heavily manipulating the final print fell out of favor" (Hostetler). Stieglitz's work portrayed a fragmentary view of modern life, where photographs merely sought to give a 'version' of the subject in an intensely personal way, versus an objective ideal of the truth. He also had an unabashedly personal focus in his approach to his art. When his daughter was born to his first wife 1898, Stieglitz had the then-unique idea of "creating a photographic journal of her life" in the form of a series of portraits throughout her phases of growing up and becoming a woman ("Portraits"). These portraits were both intensely personal and works of art.

The most famous Stieglitz subject was...

Stieglitz photographed O'Keeffe hundreds of time. His "refusal to encapsulate her personality into a single image was consistent with several modernist ideas: the idea of the fragmented sense of self, brought about by the rapid pace of modern life; the idea that a personality, like the outside world, is constantly changing, and may be interrupted but not halted by the intervention of the camera; and, finally, the realization that truth in the modern world is relative and that photographs are as much an expression of the photographer's feelings for the subject as they are a reflection of the subject depicted" (Hostetler). Unlike some later photographers of 'celebrities,' Stieglitz did not try to create a singular, iconic image of his wife. Some of his images of O'Keeffe show her in repose; others depict her with her hat on and engaging with the camera face-to-face; still others show her half-nude and sensuous. All of these images, Stieglitz suggested, were part of her unique personality. However, O'Keeffe always insisted that these works were his version of her, not an attempt to render her own character in any defining way: that was left to her own creations of her own art. "Though the title of the series, Georgia O'Keeffe: A Portrait, suggests he was attempting to capture aspects of his subject, O'Keeffe said in 1978 that in these pictures 'he was always photographing himself'" ("Portraits").
Still, in contrast to the conventional method of rendering the artist's subject, particularly the female subject, O'Keeffe is shown in her own right in the portraits as an equal. Stieglitz merely presents versions of her rather than claims to provide a definitive statement of her personality and her life. He is open about his own subjectivity and his presence as a crafting intelligence behind the works rather than makes a claim about hers. "Stieglitz called his ongoing studies of O'Keeffe a 'composite portrait,' meaning one that…