In this sense technology turns human life into just another product that can be created in a laboratory and which has no intrinsic or deeper religious value or meaning. As John Paul II stated during a visit to America, "A free and virtuous society, which America aspires to be, must reject practices that devalue and violate human life at any stage from conception until natural death" (Dart, 2001, p. 11).
This also refers to the religious view that human life is sacred from there moment of conception and that stem cell research should be prevented as it in fact destroys the fetus in order to obtain the stem cells, This view is reiterated from different perspectives by theologians from various faiths. "God formed man from the dust of the ground; then, God breathed into the man's nostrils...the breath of life; and man became a living soul...life begins in a mother's womb, not in a scientist's laboratory." (Dart, 2001, p. 11)
This view is also expressed by number medical practitioners. A British physician, Richard H. Nicholson, states that while as much as ten percent of the world's population might benefit from stem cell research, one should not forget the wider and possibly more important moral and ethical dimensions of this technology. One should, he states, be aware of... The wider risks to societal beliefs about the value of human life, if one devalues the embryo..." (Callahan, 2003, p. 178)
In conclusion, there is little doubt that stem cell research is a technology that should be prevented for achieving its ends. While the medical benefits that this technology offers are enticing, yet the price that might have to be paid for these results would be too high. Stem cell research has the potential to destabilize and even eradiate some of the most essential aspects of conventional religious beliefs. The relationship between man and God is terms of the Biblical view of creation are threatened, as well as the sanctity and the meaning of human life. While one welcomes any technology that can heal the sick and repair the wounded yet this cannot be condoned if the price that we have to pay is the destruction of human culture and religious values.
Works Cited www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=105876208
Callahan, D. (2003). What Price Better Health?...
At this point it should be clear that there are no good reasons to oppose the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research and only good reasons for supporting. Opposition to the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research can only be justified by an appeal to unreasonable and arbitrary moral standards based not on logic, reason, or concern for human well-being, but rather on the dictates of outdated and
but, Cuomo continued, Bush's position "…remains a minority view" (Hurlbut, 822). Christine Todd Whitman, who served Bush as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency in Bush's first term (she served from January 2001 to May 2003), and was the first female governor of New Jersey, supported embryonic stem cell research. Whitman noted in her book that right after Bush was re-elected in 2004, Christian conservative organizer Phil Burress was heard
The media might present an issue as fact without verifying its truth via the appropriate channels, while the public in turn is eager to accept as fact what is presented to them, as this is much more simple than researching the issues themselves, or even simply verifying the truth of a stated fact. Furthermore, the authors hold that simply educating the public regarding issues of scientific controversy is far
There are some embryos who are outside of this environment, and will not grow to be people, and are therefore suitable to use in stem cell research. There is a degree of moral ambiguity related to the debate of stem cell research -- based on the conception of when life actually begins. The acknowledgement of this aspect of the debate is acknowledged on both sides, and is a point of
In a talk delivered to the Johns Hopkins Medical Center he stated, "...we don't want to let politics, philosophy, and theology intrude on science." However, he goes on to qualify, "science qua science cannot set its own ends... Scientists left to themselves may not always make the best ethics decisions (Nizza, 2004)." Here, Fukuyama alludes to another angle that is less often mentioned -- that is that scientists and doctors
A pre-embryo is the fertilized cell that has not yet been planted into the human host. Once the pre-embryo is implanted into the female host, it is assumed that it will grow and develop into a human being. The pre-embryo is not the same as the embryo, it is simply the raw material. A national bioethics committee has been assigned the duty of exploring these issues and making recommendations that
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now