Steam and Gas Turbines
Combining steam and gas turbines into one power generation system has been a tremendous boom for multiple industrial sectors. As Pirsh & Sage (n.d.). point out, "the major advantages advanced for such cycles were the improvement in overall cycle efficiency and the reduction in capital costs," (p. 39). A combined steam and gas turbine provides the best of both worlds by minimizing heat loss and maximizing energy output gains. Energy companies like GE have been actively promoting the use of combined steam and gas turbines; while others like ANSYS have been dedicated to the development of cutting-edge combined turbine systems for use in multiple sectors. In addition to their obvious applications in commercial and private power generation, combined steam and gas turbines also have rich potential for use in naval and maritime situations.
Gas and steam combined turbines are therefore available in a wide range of configuration for use in different scenarios. Nuclear power plants are gravitating toward the use of combined-cycle turbines in lieu of steam-only generators. Efficiency is the primary goal of both gas and steam turbines; and combined-cycle turbines provide the best possible solution. Combined steam and gas turbines "incorporate lower fuel usage and reduced carbon emissions," which characterizes efficient energy production (Gas and steam Turbines," n.d.). According to one source, "a combination of gas and steam turbine leads to efficiencies of over 50%," ("Start Your Engines: Gas Turbines," n.d.). When power stations can afford heat-force coupling systems, energy efficiency can be as high as 90% -- meaning nearly no energy loss ("Start Your Engines: Gas Turbines," n.d.). Boss (n.d.) points out that "the trend toward higher gas turbine firing and exhaust temperatures has made reheat combined-cycles common," (p. 1). Called Advanced-Combined Cycles, GE's STAG is a primary example. As with standard combined steam-gas cycle systems, the waste or run-off energy is harnessed and fed back...
Quantifiable cycle efficiencies are illustrated in the following diagram ("8.7 Combined Cycles in Stationary Gas Turbine for Power Production," n.d.):
The net efficiency rate of 58% for combined cycle systems is substantiated in the literature (Kehlhofer, Hannemann, Stirnimann, & Rukes, 2009). "It is only a question of a few years until 60% will be overcome," (p. 3). Thus, new and breakthrough technologies are operating at even greater efficiency with lower energy loss and lower cost of production.
Combined steam and gas turbines work on fairly simple principles. "The warm exhaust air of the gas turbine is…used for the production of steam for a steam turbine," ("Start Your Engines: Gas Turbines," n.d.). The following diagram illustrates one type of combined steam-gas turbine configuration:
Diagram from "8.7 Combined Cycles in Stationary Gas Turbine for Power Production," (n.d.). This type of configuration is called a gas turbine-steam combined cycle power plant. The next diagram here shows the schematic of the overall heat engine, "which can be thought of as composed of an upper and a lower heat engine in series," (8.7 Combined Cycles in Stationary Gas Turbine for Power Production," n.d.). Heat inputs are indicated in these diagrams, and the outputs are also indicated. Heat exchange cycles are the hallmark of a combined steam and gas turbine. The benefits of each cycle are combined into a highly effective combined cycle that takes the energy loss of gas and fuels the hungry steam cycle.
Both diagrams reveal the ways lost energy is re-introduced into the system. The higher temperature cycle is known as the topping cycle. The waste that the topping cycle produces is re-introduced into the system but at a lower temperature. This is called the bottoming cycle (Kehlhofer, Hannemann, Stirnimann, & Rukes, 2009). Gas turbines are referred to in terms of the Brayton cycle, whereas the…
