Calgary Public School Board
Models of Consultation and Collaboration
What model of consultation and collaboration am I going to use -- and why? I am employing a combination of approaches to the issues confronting teachers when it comes to William Perry and Janna Small. The model devised by Idol, Nevin, Paolucci-Whitcomb (INPW) (referred to as the "Collaborative Consultation Model"), was specifically designed to help " . . . learners who may be at risk for school failure," learners in "remedial programs," learners who receive "supportive speech and language instruction" (Idol, et al., 1995). In particular, the INPW model has proven to be successful for teachers who have "special needs students in their classrooms" (Idol, 348).
Also, I will use the two models employed by the Iowa Department of Education since 2009 -- co-teaching and collaborative consultation.
What factors have I considered in my decision? As the model by INPW puts forth, there are four solid practices that have been shown to be effective vis-a-vis collaborative consultations. First, learners with special needs, as are the two students we're dealing with in this assignment, can be effectively served in "inclusive settings when teachers collaborate" in order to both generate and merge together "instructional strategies and accommodation ideas" (Idol, 349). In other words, I considered that having teachers (both special education teachers and mainstream teachers) get together and provide smart, collaborative leadership to provide what's best for students with special needs.
Secondly, teachers and other school professionals have proven to be successful when they work together to acquire "the disposition, knowledge, and skills to collaborate effectively." Thirdly, solutions that are collaboratively produced are "enhanced" when original solutions come from individual teachers committed to collaboration with other teachers (Idol, 349). This could mean that teachers in some environments would need to attend seminars, or otherwise become upgraded and updated vis-a-vis working together (even though their subjects are far afield from each other).
And fourthly, changes that are positive and motivating -- based on collaborators working together with open minds and knowledge of students with special needs -- can be expected at three levels, Idol and colleagues explain.
Those three levels of positive support include: a) team teaching among special education and general education instructors will bring positive changes in the school (not just to the students involved, but the whole school); b) there will be productive changes in the "skills, attitudes, and behaviors of adult collaborators" (teachers involved in the collaboration will be impacted through positive, intellectual and pedagogue-related growth; c) and there will be quantifiable progress in the academic and social...
They prepare strategies, the SE teacher works with the reading teacher and they agree on strategies to access William's ability to grasp content, on a very basic level.
Step TWO: The teachers initiate the consultation and there needs to be an establishment of rapport -- everyone is special and everyone is important. SE teacher works with William and one of two other SE students. The game Zoom is a good teamwork-building activity between William and Stephen (reading teacher shows a picture / photo of an object (let's say a dog); Stephen begins a story about the dog, and William is asked to continue the story. Rapport is established.
Step THREE: Even before the consultation, both teachers (who are not necessarily always in the room at the same time) collect and organize information; i.e., make notes and summarize what they discussed in terms of the needs of William. During their collaboration they carefully record each step they take, and William's responses (facial expressions, body language, and his verbal responses).
Step FOUR: Isolating the problem means coming to terms with what the problem is, and what it is not. When William talks about his father's anger during homework sessions, the SE and reading teachers know this is a problem that can't be ignored; e.g., they must work with the school psychologist at some level, and bring the parents into the picture.
Step FIVE: By identifying the concerns (of the parents, William and the teachers) and avoiding cliches and jargon, and by focusing on William's needs and issues, a sense of resolution can be achieved.
Step SIX: Generating options means possibly changing the physical configuration of the classroom. Possible solutions and alternatives must be discussed by the teachers through brainstorming, idea-development and concept mapping.
Step SEVEN: Goals for how to best work with William must be set, and roles between the two teachers are to be formulated. Methods for evaluation of the efforts put forward should be established.
Step EIGHT: The professional collaborative relationship between the teachers vis-a-vis working with William (and other SE students) should be reviewed and assessed.
Step NINE: Follow-through is vital in order…
" This kind of paperwork is time-consuming and meticulous. This IEP can be reviewed as often as parents or teachers request it, and "must be accessible to all staff responsible for its implementation," which includes general education teachers and other school staff. Meanwhile, if a special education student is having problems in class, for whatever reason, he or she may be brought before the school's "Instructional Study Team," which consists of
This qualitative research uses a Delphi study to explore the perceptions of special education teachers regarding retention. This Delphi study includes twenty-five to thirty special education teachers of K-12 in two California districts of less than 40,000 students. The information gathered provides leaders in the field with successful practices in retaining special education teachers. Purpose of the study The primary purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions of special education
(Billingsley, 2004, p. 39) It is clear that the development of collaborative systems that address this feeling of isolation among special education teachers would make great strides toward addressing the problem not only of attrition but also overall satisfaction when a teacher remains in the profession, despite the obstacles. Many educators even note that the problem goes so deep that the best way to solve it is to combine the educational
Then students use AlphaSmart software to paste the picture and explain in a paragraph why, how and where in the plot they feel that picture relates to the story. This tests three things: (a) student concentration; (b) student level of understanding of the general plot; and - student imagination. This is an important implementation because it opens the students' horizons and allows them to see the general links and
Thus, efforts aimed at helping teachers to avoid harmful stereotyping of students often begin with activities designed to raise teachers' awareness of their unconscious biases." (1989) Cotton goes on the relate that there are specific ways in which differential expectations are communicated to students according to the work of: "Brookover, et al. (1982); Brophy (1983); Brophy and Evertson (1976); Brophy and Good (1970); Cooper and Good (1983); Cooper and
Special Education: Collaboration Between Teachers The majority of special education students receive instruction in both general education classes as well as special education support classes. Most of these students are enrolled in Resource Support Programs in which a special education teacher has responsibility for offering learning supports across the general education curriculum. The job of the special education teacher, or Resource Specialist, is to ensure that the student's IEP is properly
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now