Verified Document

Special Duties Of Prosecutors One Of The Essay

Special Duties of Prosecutors One of the major differentiating aspects of the United States of America is the fact that if arrested, you are innocent until proven guilty. This is a rare concept among legal systems. Most countries deem the suspect guilty until proven innocent. In the United States, it is the duty of the Prosecutor to find the defendant guilty, while the defense attorney is solely responsible for upholding his client's innocence. The prosecutor is seen in a special light by the public. Smith (2001) says that it is understood that prosecutors have the moral high ground, that they are the good guys and are on the "right" side. Prosecutors are representatives of the state and the government, in essence, the people. This responsibility gives the prosecutor a special light, almost making them seem noble, as they seek the truth and justice (Smith 2001). They prosecute villains, and seek justice for victims, while defense attorneys are often thought of in a much less positive way. Defender's morals are questioned, deemed "sleazy," "slick," or worse (Smith 2001). Yet, to have a fair due process of law, both sides are needed. Both, the prosecutors and defenders, should be extended the same rights and privileges, to ensure justice was appropriately served. This is not necessarily the case, as prosecutors have an edge with the Grand Jury.

Prosecutors, start judicial actions against a criminal suspect by introducing a case to a grand jury. In the federal legal system and in most states, grand juries are used to bring charges for felonies. If a grand jury is not used, a prosecutor can bring charges against a suspect using an information. Grand juries are dual natured;...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

This means that grand juries investigate crimes and deliberate on what charges to present for trial. It is referred to as a "sword" and "shield" (Cassidy 2000). It is referred to as a sword because of its power of subpoena, which is the power to compel testimony and the power to grant immunity for witnesses. As a shield, grand juries may protect innocent individuals from accusations not supported by probable cause (Cassidy 2000).
The American grand jury is made up of twenty-three citizens. The work they do is conducted in secrecy, and the modern grand jury adheres to the advice and instruction from only one lawyer, the prosecutor. In a grand jury, the prosecutor is responsible for making an opening statement, examining the witnesses, introducing evidence, creating the draft indictment, and teaching the jury on the legal components of the crimes presented in the recommended charge (Cassidy 2000). In certain states, the prosecutor can even stay in the room as the grand jury deliberates, to answer any questions any jurors may have. On the other end of the spectrum, the defender has no role in the grand jury except advise his client, if called as witness. If the client is not called as witness, then the defense attorney is not even allowed in the room. Cassidy (2000) writes how neither the rules of evidence, nor the constitutional rights of a defendant to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, to confront the witnesses against him, and to testify in his own defense apply in a grand jury.

Grand juries return indictments at very high rates. It can be easily inferred, that is due to…

Sources used in this document:
References:

Arenella Peter. (1979-1980). Reforming the Federal Grand Jury and the State Preliminary Hearing to Prevent Conviction without Adjudication. Mich. L. Rev. 78 507-509.

Cassidy, R., Michael. (1999-2000). Toward A More Independent Grand Jury: Recasting and Enforcing the Prosecutor's Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence. Geo. J. Legal Ethics. 13 361-365

Drucker, E.M. (2013). A plague of prisons: The epidemiology of mass incarceration in America.

Smith Abbe. (2000-2001). Can You Be a Good Person and a Good Prosecutor?. Geo. J. Legal Ethics. 14, 355-400.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea Bargaining
Words: 1236 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea bargaining by its very nature implies negotiation, which in turn means that two or more parties are seeking to achieve specific goals with the cooperation of the other parties. In the absence of plea bargaining the parties would face each other in court as adversaries in front of a referee and their conduct and the trial's proceedings would be strictly controlled according to the law and

Plea Bargaining: What Does It
Words: 2084 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

The ethical considerations have been addressed in the survey by the elements of the plea bargain provided to the individuals surveyed. Herzog's study shall serve as the model for the study proposed here. This study should serve anyone interested in understanding the public opinion and perceptions as they relate to plea bargaining. References (recommended) www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5013705813 Bibas, S. (2005). White-Collar Plea Bargaining and Sentencing after Booker. William and Mary Law Review, 47(3), 721+.

Plea Bargaining, Otherwise Known As:
Words: 3023 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Proposal

" This means that, "It is an indictment of the criminal justice system, not plea bargaining itself" (Sandefur, 2003, p. 31). The Constitution incorporated the right to a trial into the process, and it does not necessarily entail that: the defendant needs to know his rights in waiving them or hiring a legal counsel to help. Sandefur finally stated that, "Plea bargaining is not perfect, but its problems are procedures

Plea Bargaining and Crime
Words: 909 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Many criminal cases are often resolved out of court through agreement between the aggrieved party and the offender. The process of achieving such a settlement is referred to as Plea Bargain in law. It is a practice that is used in many jurisdictions to resolve cases. Either of the sides in the case may initiate the Plea bargain process. Both sides have to agree before such a process succeeds

Plea Bargaining in the United States
Words: 1906 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Benefits From Plea Bargaining? Although the U.S. Constitution guarantees all defendants a trial by jury, individuals entering the criminal justice system today have about a one-in-twenty chance of actually undergoing a trial, with the rest of the cases being plea bargained away. While this approach facilitates the disposition of cases in already overbooked courtrooms, plea bargaining has been the source of a growing amount of criticism as a result of

Plea Bargaining System in the
Words: 1299 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

" However, in 1852, the Massachusetts legislature removed the prosecution's power to nol pros without the judge's consent. This eliminated the prosecution's key leverage over defendants in liquor cases: the power to charge and then drop some charges in exchange for a plea. Sure enough, the number of clear plea bargains dropped dramatically, and the number of trials increased concomitantly (Fisher, 2003)." BENEFITS There are numerous benefits to using the plea bargain system.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now