Verified Document

Special Duties Of Prosecutors One Of The Essay

Special Duties of Prosecutors One of the major differentiating aspects of the United States of America is the fact that if arrested, you are innocent until proven guilty. This is a rare concept among legal systems. Most countries deem the suspect guilty until proven innocent. In the United States, it is the duty of the Prosecutor to find the defendant guilty, while the defense attorney is solely responsible for upholding his client's innocence. The prosecutor is seen in a special light by the public. Smith (2001) says that it is understood that prosecutors have the moral high ground, that they are the good guys and are on the "right" side. Prosecutors are representatives of the state and the government, in essence, the people. This responsibility gives the prosecutor a special light, almost making them seem noble, as they seek the truth and justice (Smith 2001). They prosecute villains, and seek justice for victims, while defense attorneys are often thought of in a much less positive way. Defender's morals are questioned, deemed "sleazy," "slick," or worse (Smith 2001). Yet, to have a fair due process of law, both sides are needed. Both, the prosecutors and defenders, should be extended the same rights and privileges, to ensure justice was appropriately served. This is not necessarily the case, as prosecutors have an edge with the Grand Jury.

Prosecutors, start judicial actions against a criminal suspect by introducing a case to a grand jury. In the federal legal system and in most states, grand juries are used to bring charges for felonies. If a grand jury is not used, a prosecutor can bring charges against a suspect using an information. Grand juries are dual natured;...

This means that grand juries investigate crimes and deliberate on what charges to present for trial. It is referred to as a "sword" and "shield" (Cassidy 2000). It is referred to as a sword because of its power of subpoena, which is the power to compel testimony and the power to grant immunity for witnesses. As a shield, grand juries may protect innocent individuals from accusations not supported by probable cause (Cassidy 2000).
The American grand jury is made up of twenty-three citizens. The work they do is conducted in secrecy, and the modern grand jury adheres to the advice and instruction from only one lawyer, the prosecutor. In a grand jury, the prosecutor is responsible for making an opening statement, examining the witnesses, introducing evidence, creating the draft indictment, and teaching the jury on the legal components of the crimes presented in the recommended charge (Cassidy 2000). In certain states, the prosecutor can even stay in the room as the grand jury deliberates, to answer any questions any jurors may have. On the other end of the spectrum, the defender has no role in the grand jury except advise his client, if called as witness. If the client is not called as witness, then the defense attorney is not even allowed in the room. Cassidy (2000) writes how neither the rules of evidence, nor the constitutional rights of a defendant to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures, to confront the witnesses against him, and to testify in his own defense apply in a grand jury.

Grand juries return indictments at very high rates. It can be easily inferred, that is due to…

Sources used in this document:
References:

Arenella Peter. (1979-1980). Reforming the Federal Grand Jury and the State Preliminary Hearing to Prevent Conviction without Adjudication. Mich. L. Rev. 78 507-509.

Cassidy, R., Michael. (1999-2000). Toward A More Independent Grand Jury: Recasting and Enforcing the Prosecutor's Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence. Geo. J. Legal Ethics. 13 361-365

Drucker, E.M. (2013). A plague of prisons: The epidemiology of mass incarceration in America.

Smith Abbe. (2000-2001). Can You Be a Good Person and a Good Prosecutor?. Geo. J. Legal Ethics. 14, 355-400.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Forensic Accounting Is a Special Subsection of
Words: 2063 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Forensic accounting is a special subsection of accounting that goes beyond the typical job description of an accountant. Forensic accountants use their work in courtroom and other legal settings to help. Their primary roles are litigation support and investigative accounting (Zysman, 2012). To do this, forensic accountants combine accounting, auditing, and investigative skills. However, conducting investigations is only one component of a forensic accountant's job description; they also have to

Offices in the Judicial System, E.G. Prosecutor,
Words: 6170 Length: 18 Document Type: Term Paper

offices in the judicial system, e.g. prosecutor, private attorney, public defender, and comparatively discuss the origin, development, behavior and relatedness of each to the other person would be considered till such a time, innocent of a crime, in the U.S. judicial system when he or she would be proved found guilty in a court of law by a jury of peers or common citizens. On the functioning of the

Branches of Government Was Structured
Words: 2279 Length: 7 Document Type: Research Proposal

If a plea bargain is reached before the trial, often the trial will not continue. The suspect will be sentenced and then continue to incarceration. Plea-bargaining is a legal tool, which keep the courts from becoming too clogged (Champion 208). This ends the Pre-Trial phase of the criminal court system. Next in the process is the trial itself. Most people who enjoy courtroom dramas will recognize this phase of the

Best Practices in Policing Alcohol
Words: 17761 Length: 40 Document Type: Research Proposal

Of course, it becomes a very difficult matter to overcome sparse levels of availability when they are encountered (e.g. In the more remote regions of Western Australia). Taken together, the issues suggest that the impact of availability policy on the use of alcohol may be as heterogeneous as patterns of availability themselves. The reduction of one outlet in an urban area has significantly different meaning and implications than the reduction

Peace, Justice and Reconciliation Following
Words: 1924 Length: 4 Document Type: Research Paper

Victims can participate in the proceedings, presenting their voices and concerns. They are invited, and it would be good for us if they present their concerns in court. They can also request compensation from those under investigation. It will be a demanding process and there could be delays and setbacks. Our first trial was stayed two times. We had to appeal the genocide charges against President Al Bashir. So there

Enron Sham and Shame the
Words: 3249 Length: 11 Document Type: Term Paper

The first set of rules required in-house lawyers to report frauds to the organization's highest authorities. The second set provided exceptions to the general rule on legal confidentiality. Both sets were heatedly discussed for decades. Similar scandals since the 70s, which gave rise to similar heated debates, included the National Student Marketing securities fraud, the OPM commercial fraud, the Lincoln Savings & Loan and Allied Savings and Loans scandal

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now