Verified Document

Solution To The Gay Marriage Term Paper

A law that infringes upon the rights of a citizen to be free is a law that must be changed. The second part of the 14th amendment upon which the ban on gay marriage infringes is the right to property. Married couples share a great number of benefits not available to persons without a certificate of marriage. One of these benefits falls under the heading of Estate Planning. A married person inherits a portion of the spouse's estate after the spouse dies. A married person also receives an exemption from estate and gift taxes if property is given or left to the spouse. Gay couples are not allowed to receive these benefits in most states, because they are not allowed to be married in most states (NOLO).

Another property benefit gay couples cannot receive is the family benefit. Under the family benefit is the right to receiving equitable division of property should a divorce take place. As it stands, gay couples that break up are not afforded this protection since they are not recognized as married couples (NOLO).

The third property benefit that gay couples are denied is the housing benefit. The housing benefit allows married couples to live in neighborhoods that are zoned for families only. It also allows for the automatic renewing of leases signed by one's spouse. As far as the property issue goes, gay couples do not inherit a portion of the spouse's estate after the spouse dies, they are not allowed to be exempted from the estate or gift taxes imposed by the federal government, they are not afforded an equitable division of property should there be a break-up, nor are they allowed to live in neighborhoods zoned for families only, all because they are not legally allowed to be married.

While the 14th amendment to the constitution guarantees all citizens the rights to liberty and property, the failure of the federal government to recognize the marriage of its same-sex citizens directly infringes upon these rights. In fact, even for persons residing in one of the places that have legalized same-sex marriage, the federal benefits still do not apply because...

This is a law that must be changed because it is in direct violation of the 14th Amendment to the constitution.
Legal precedent has been set for the changing of marriage laws that are considered unjust. Up until 1967, interracial marriages were illegal (Mathabane). Before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a couple facing charges of breaking this law, interracial marriage was treated as a felony punishable by five years in a state penitentiary (Methabane). During this case, the Supreme Court counted marriage as one of the "vital personal rights" protected under the 14th Amendment. Gay marriage is not punishable by prison time, but failure to recognize the marriages of one entire group of U.S. citizens goes against the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, and the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court in 1967.

The Federal government and state governments should focus on what brings people together, rather than what keeps them apart. Strong families are valuable, lasting domestic partnerships are essential, and communities that are populated by persons with recognized and sanctioned bonds to one another are central to the strength and vitality of the United States of America. Regardless of personal opinions on the issue of homosexuality, gays are members of American society. They are doctors, teachers, athletes, musicians, actors, family members, friends, and yes, even soldiers. They are human beings who are denied a basic, essential right, a right that is guaranteed by the founding documents of the United States. It is time to legalize gay marriage.

Works Cited

Mathabane, Gail. "Gays face same battle interracial couple fought." USA Today. 25 Jan.

2004. Web. 17 Mar. 2010.

Olson, Theodore B. "The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage." Newsweek. 18 Jan.

2010: 68 -- 70. Print.

Urbina, Ian. "Gay Marriage is Legal in U.S. Capital." The New York Times. 3 Mar. 2010.

Web. 25 Mar. 2010.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Mathabane, Gail. "Gays face same battle interracial couple fought." USA Today. 25 Jan.

2004. Web. 17 Mar. 2010.

Olson, Theodore B. "The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage." Newsweek. 18 Jan.

2010: 68 -- 70. Print.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Gay Marriage Many Same-Sex Couples Want to
Words: 4931 Length: 12 Document Type: Annotated Bibliography

Gay Marriage Many same-sex couples want to be granted the right to legally marry. The reason is simple: They are in love with each other. They want to honor their relationship in the greatest way society has to offer, by making a public commitment to stand together in good times and bad life brings. While they receive some state-level protections, they do not receive most of the federal emotional and economic

Gay Marriage Being Homosexual and
Words: 1886 Length: 6 Document Type: Research Proposal

Instead, give gay and straight couples alike the same license, a certificate confirming them as a family, and call it a civil union -- anything, really, other than marriage. For people who feel the word marriage is important, the next stop after the courthouse could be the church, where they could bless their union with all the religious ceremony they wanted. Religions would lose nothing of their role in sanctioning

Solutions to Marriage Debate the Marriage Debate
Words: 856 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Solutions to Marriage Debate The marriage debate is a polarizing debate regarding, most people assume, whether gay individuals should have the right to marriage or not. On the homosexual side, it is important to be afforded the same rights as married couples both because they wish to enjoy the same benefits accorded those who are married and because the status of married carries with it different connotations. The opposite opinion

Homosexual Marriage Does Not Pose a Threat
Words: 5767 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

Homosexual marriage does not pose a threat to me or my manhood therefore I am for it." Although I am heterosexual, I know what it means to long for union with another human being. I will choose a woman for my partner, but if another man desires to choose one of his own sex, there is no harm for me in his choice. In fact, since we are both

Pro-Gay Marriage. It Establish a Tone Specific
Words: 780 Length: 2 Document Type: Thesis

pro-gay marriage. It establish a tone specific audience. It convey logos, pathos, ethos, depending audience. The thesis statement sentence paragraph. In favor of same-sex marriage Marriage is an institution that is supposed to foster social stability as well as honor the respect and love the partners feel for one another. Gay marriage is increasingly supported by a majority of the American public. "One major reason is that the wish and push

Gay Adoption Is an Important
Words: 10332 Length: 30 Document Type: Term Paper

Of this group. 50% were male, 50% were female, 38% were White, 35% were Black, and 16% were Hispanic. Adoption statistics are difficult to find because reporting is not as complete as it should be. The government spent $2.6 billion dollars to conduct the 1990 Census, but still it under-represented minorities and categorized children as "natural or by adoption" without differentiating, while special laws were implemented to "protect" and

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now