Israel vs. Palestine Conflict
The author of this report has been asked to write an essay about the conflict between the Israeli people and the Palestinians as it has existed over time. Much of the conflict has actually extended over millennia when it comes to the stretch of land that is involved. However, this report will focus on the last century or so. The first question to be answered is simply a summary of the conflict that has existed between the two groups over the last century. The second question talks about sovereignty and nationalism in the context of the conflict that is being discussed. The conflict is then to be analyzed in terms of power and statecraft. Finally, there will be the prisoner's dilemma discussion from a realist and from a neo-liberal understanding.
Questions Answered
Basically, the gist of the Palestinian gripe is that they have gone from controlling all of Israel starting in 1947. They then lost much of their land in the "Partition Plan" that happened in 1947. From 1949 thru 1967, they controlled a sliver in the central part of Israel and then the West Bank. Nowadays, they control a fraction of that land with the West bank and a few spots in central Israel. For the longest time, there was apparently peace in that sliver of land. Indeed, the 19th century showed people living in peace with there being about 86% Muslims, ten percent Christians and four percent Jewish people. In the late 1800's, a group of people in Europe decided to colonize the land. These people were known as Zionists and they represented an extreme minority of the Jewish population. Their goal was to create a Jewish homeland and they considered a litany of locatins in Africa, the Americas and so forth before settling on the area that is commonly known as Palestine (If Americans Knew, 2015).
At first, there were no issues with this migration. However, as more and more people moved to Palestine, it became clear that many people wanted to take over the area for a Jewish state. As this became more and more present, there was more and more fighting as well as general escalating waves of violence. Hitler's rise to power as well as the combination of Zionists activities to stop refugees being placed in Western countries led to immigration more and more to Palestine. This caused the conflict to grow. Finally, there was the United Nations Partition Plan in 1947. This came when the United Nations decided to intervene. Rather than simply adhering to the principle of "self-determination of the peoples" in which people themselves create their own system of government, the United Nations chose to revert to the "medieval strategy" whereby an outside power makes the lines of the nation or nations involved (If Americans Knew, 2015).
Under considerable pressure from the Zionists, the United Nations recommended giving away about fifty-five percent of what was prior-known as Palestine to the Jewish state. This was despite the fact that the group only represented thirty percent of the population and only owned about seven percent of the land. What came next was the 1947-1949 wear. It is widely reported that the resulting war eventually included the totality of the five Arab armies. However, it less well-known that the Zionist forces outnumbered all of the Arab and Palestinian combatants combined. This was often to the point of being to a factor of two or three. Almost all of the battles were fought on lands that were to have been part of the Palestinian state. Finally, it is fairly significant to many that the Arab armies enter the conflict only after the Zionist armies had committed sixteen massacres. This included the massacre of about one hundred men, women and children at Deir Yassin. Future Israeli prime Minister Menachem Begin, who was head of one of the Jewish terrorist groups, described the event as "splendid" and stated "as in Deir Yassin, so everywhere, we will attack and smite the enemy. God, God, Thou has chosen us for conquest." In total, the Zionist forces committed nearly three dozen massacres altogether according to many reports (If Americans Knew, 2015).
By the end of the war, Israel had conquered more than three fourths (78%) of Palestine. Three quarters of a million Palestinians were made into refugees. Roughly five hundred towns were destroyed and eliminated. A new map had been drawn up in which every city, river and hillock received a new name that was in Hebrew rather than in Arabic. It was an...
Theological differences are the least important issue facing Jews and Muslims. The Palestinians rightfully believe that the British stole their homelands from them after the Second World War, and that both the United Kingdom and the Untied States unabashedly support Israel. The Israelis, on the other hand, point to the recurring incidences of terrorism that plague the country and prevent peace. When both sides focus on the past instead of
Middle East Violence Three major sources of violence in the Middle East are religion, nationalism and ideology. Each source contributes to some extent to the violence, depending on the conflict. Some conflicts are largely religious in nature, such as the Shiite uprising in the Sadaa region of Yemen (McGregor, 2005). Others are rooted in nationalism, such as the conflict between Kurds and Turks in southeastern Turkey (Haney, 1999). Most conflicts blend
The parallels are of Sheikh Mohammad are drawn with King Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia who used oil to build the foundation of modern Saudi Arabia. He can also be considered a CEO who is managing his emirate like a big company using the modern management principles. He is using the principles of modern participatory management as he does not confine himself to boardrooms or high power meetings and
Although some received territory, they were embittered as a result of the perceived broken pledge. The result of this was an Arab uprising against the Turks in 1916. The San Remo Conference nevertheless began to shape the post-war world (McKinney 2010). The result was that the Europeans were making impositions into country where the various nations were having unique conflicts of their own. According to Roberts (2007), for example, The
There are a few who have been or are now involved with groups that are seeking conciliation.. The positive similarity of many of these individuals is that they would like to see a productive end to the situation, even if it means compromise. There is no possibility of peace in the Middle East unless people from all backgrounds, who are the most affected, are part of the dialogue. The nations,
Middle East Crisis is a crisis that has been building for decades. The American Government has become involved in the conflict calling for peace in the area. This involvement is based on America as a protector of human rights and also because of the consequence to itself, with the conflict causing economic, human and environmental concerns. It must be considered exactly what can be done about the conflict and
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now