The high stakes testing proponents believes that the use of testing will motivate students, their families and teachers to take education more seriously. (Nathan, 2002, p.595) Many opponents on the other hand believe that "teaching to the test" will likely prove disastrous for the schools and curriculums involved and this is especially true if the test is the only gauge of success or if there is any question as to the validity of the test. (Toch, 2005, 26)
Either way, the debate rages on and the situation of quantitative data as the driving force behind school improvement is upon us. This change also requires that administrators and others become statisticians, interpreting and adding to data at every possible turn, in order to seek out as much qualitative information as possible from the quantitative data. This may mean finding and utilizing data systems, secondary to the high stakes yearly (or every three-year) tests, that many argue offer answers after changes can be implemented. One example of just such a tactic of utilizing quantitative methodology to access more telling information can be found at Alexander Elementary School in Jackson, Tennessee, where they use a method called Data in a Day to quickly look at strengths and weaknesses in the manner in which the daily operations and environments of the school are fairing. (Walsh, 2001, p.547) The data is literally collected and reported on within the course of one school day to assist the school in making immediate changes and rewarding immediate successes. The assumptive theory being that if data is the only tool allowed determining success and/or failure than the data must be comprehensive, rather than too little to late, as high stakes testing tends to become. Through this process all involved are immediately made aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the system and environment and can appropriately alter the situation to better meet the needs of students. It would be wise for some administrators to look at such a system to balance outcomes testing, affordably and in a way that serves continuous school improvement.
The role of data in schools has always been one of careful consideration, as data sets have been collected randomly and decidedly in this giant peatree dish that we call an education system. Schools are by far one of the best places to conduct research as the overall goal can be demonstrated and can be "scientific" in a way that many other settings cannot be. Raw data is more available in a standard school than almost anywhere else. The importance in this new stress is that data must be essential and balanced. It must measure for the goal of improvement, rather than for the eventual mark of failure as some say high stakes testing is doing. (Nathan, 2002, 595) The type of data that should be collected cannot be limited simply to student testing outcomes on standardized exams as such a view offers little recourse for immediate individual student achievement or even school improvement for that matter. The kind of data that should be collected should be well rounded and timely in that it offers a near immediate solution for an obstacle that could make or break a student or a system.
Schools can collect data on safety, as in perceptions of safety on the part of teachers and students, a set of data that could offer them instant recourse for a problem that can and often does poison a school to learning. (Bon, Faircloth & Letendre, 2006, p. 148) Schools and districts can and often do collect data on parent involvement, often a mark of overall success and/or failure of individual students and schools. (Pena, 2000, p.. 42) Schools and districts collect data on teacher empowerment and job satisfaction as well as performance through more means than how well their students perform on standardized tests,...
Some specific examples of this include the following: Quantitative methods are used to construct the sample of participants to the drug test or clinical trial Quantitative methods are used to describe the features of the participants, such as their age, their medical history, the gravity of their conditions, the projections of success of the trial / drug test for the various patient categories and so on Quantitative methods are used to
mixed methods research simply taking half a quantitative plan and half of a qualitative plan and putting them together?" And an articulation of the challenges to using a mixed methods strategy of inquiry. To what extent is mixed methods research simply taking half a quantitative plan and half of a qualitative plan and putting them together? Mixed methods approaches blend aspects of both quantitative and qualitative research designs in their construction.
experimental strategies of inquiry. Quantitative methods: Surveys vs. experiments Surveys are primarily used to compile data on a particular phenomenon. Cross-sectional studies attempt to encapsulate a phenomenon that is occurring at a particular point in time while longitudinal studies track a phenomenon for an extended duration of time (Survey methods, 2013, IS School). Regardless, the purpose of surveys is informative. The method is not designed come to a conclusion about why
International Ship and Port Security (ISPS) Code on Maritime Security The study will be based on the question that "What is the impact of the International Ship and Port Security (ISPS) Code on Maritime Security." Answers will be sought to have this question addressed adequately. The study feels that the ISPS Code has some impacts upon the Maritime Security in the world. Thus, the study seeks to uncover the various impacts
Sociological Perspective The sociological perspective is a perspective on how human activity and behavior relates to society. By looking at the relationship between individuals and social structures, the sociological perspective emerges as one that identifies functions, conflicts and interactions within society and among people. In other words, the sociological perspective allows researchers to see how people and society relate to one another, what connects them, what drives them, and what shapes
Research instruments fall into two broad categories: those compiled by the researcher him or herself in the form of recorded observations, logs, and rating scales and those completed by the interview subject him or herself in the form of questionnaires and interviews. Regardless of the instruments used, research studies should be guided by acceptable standards of validity and reliability. "Validity is the extent to which an instrument measures what it
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now