Verified Document

Social Darwinism Statement Of The Issue Beginning Essay

Social Darwinism Statement of the Issue

Beginning with a discussion of Social Darwinism's inherent logical fallacy, this study examines whether or not wealthy industrialists of the nineteenth century actually practiced what Social Darwinism called for. By considering the history of the concept and its relation to capitalism, it becomes clear that not only did wealthy industrialists practice Social Darwinism, but that they embraced it precisely because it provided a justification for the unethical business practices they were already engaged in.

Statement of the Issue

Social Darwinism was a major force in the political, economic, and social landscape of the nineteenth and early twentieth century, but it represents something of a conundrum for the historian attempting to determine whether or not the wealthy industrialists who were proponents of Social Darwinism actually practiced what they preached. The difficulty stems from the fact that Social Darwinism is itself an example of a formal fallacy, namely, the appeal to nature. In short, proponents of Social Darwinism argued that because nature demonstrates evolution through natural selection resulting in a kind of "survival of the fittest," this necessarily means that the same kind of ruthless competition is the ideal form of social organization, because it supposedly "leads to both material and social progress" (Bannister, 1993, p. 115, Klein, 2003, p. 387). This is an invalid argument because whether or not something exists in nature has no bearing on whether it is moral, immoral, or good or bad at achieving a specific goal. That there is "an obvious analogy between competition in biological and economic systems" has no bearing on whether or not the latter is desirable, and in fact, history has shown that the encouragement of this form of competition in society does not lead to social progress, but rather encourages social deterioration and reduces material progress for all but the most powerful...

767). Thus, because it has no logically sound justification, one cannot help but regard Social Darwinism as a kind of pseudo-intellectual justification for the excesses and social ills created and perpetuated by the wealthy industrialists who proposed it. In turn, the question of whether or not wealthy industrialists practiced what they preached becomes more a question of whether or not they acted in their own interest at the expense of the less powerful, and in this regard, the answer in unequivocally yes. However, this does not mean that one need not consider the question more deeply, because the legacy of Social Darwinism continues to have resonance to this day.
Analysis

Though not called Social Darwinism until much later, the collection of ideas regarding the social application of "survival of the fittest" emerged near the end of the nineteenth century, as Darwin's theory of evolution was permeating the public consciousness (Bannister, 1993, p. 4). To begin, it is worth noting that a number of historians and apologists maintain the position that while "it is true that in the last half of the 19th century great numbers of Americans were ideologically committed to the notions of competitions, merited success, and deserved failure […] it is not true that this commitment was grounded on Darwinian premises" (Wilson qtd. In Bannister, 1993, p. 7). This position essentially attempts to separate wealthy industrialists like Andrew Carnegie or John D. Rockefeller from the now-pejorative term Social Darwinism, but it does so by confusing the order of things. Put simply, Social Darwinism was not the basis for capitalist beliefs regarding competition, exploitation, and social disregard, but rather a justification for it after the fact. In this sense, it does not matter if certain wealthy industrialists explicitly supported Social Darwinism, because regardless of their specific statements, Social Darwinism supported them.

Secondly, it…

Sources used in this document:
References

Bannister, R. (1993). Social darwinism: Science and myth in anglo-american social thought.

Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Klein, S. (2003). The natural roots of capitalism and its virtues and values. Journal of Business

Ethics, 45(4), 387-401.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Darwinism and the Standard Social Science Model
Words: 2086 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Darwinism and the Standard Social Science Model If the Standard Social Science Model is mistaken, then we are less altruistic than would otherwise be the case'. Put another way, the same statement could read, "If culture is not the underlying cause of human behavior, then human beings are more selfish than they would be if culture were the underlying cause of human behavior." An evaluation of this statement rests not only on

Corporate Social Responsibility Sony Corporate Social Responsibility...
Words: 2695 Length: 10 Document Type: Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility (Sony) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is no longer a tenable option to just be silent. Companies have to take responsibilities of their actions as a result of the impacts their businesses causes to the community and their stakeholders. For example during the recent oil spill of the British Petroleum Company (BP), at the coast of United States, the U.S. government did not remain silent on the issue but

Ethical Egoism and Abortion
Words: 3618 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Paper

Ethical Egoism & Abortion Ethical egoism, as a philosophical position, holds that it is an ethical obligation for people to act in their own self-interest. How does this philosophical position deal with the debate over the morality of abortion? It is necessary, before beginning a closer analysis, to define our terms. Abortion is a hotly contested issue, but our sense of ethics here needs to be understood first as distinct from

Gilded Age of the United
Words: 3107 Length: 10 Document Type: Essay

While some of the wealthy were philanthropic and socially conscious, most of the business magnates believed their financial success proved them to be the most capable and entitled to the spoils of the success. This created a system of social and economic inequity which created a reaction to the Gilded Age well before the Age itself closed. Impact of and Reaction to the Gilded Age of Big Business The Progressive era

Trial One of the Most
Words: 2171 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

In 2005, a Federal Judge in Georgia ruled that any sticker or notice violated the separation of Church and state, "Due to the manner in which the sticker refers to evolution as a theory, the sticker also has the effect of undermining evolution eduction. . . The distinction of evolution as a theory rather than a fact is the distinction that religiously motivated individuals have specifically asked school boards

Theodore Roosevelt: An American for
Words: 3918 Length: 10 Document Type: Research Proposal

... They were accustomed to living in the open, to enduring great fatigue and hardship, and to encountering all kinds of danger." The war against Spain and for the liberation of Cuba was one that would prove the superiority of America and its ideals. The United States, too, could join the nations of Europe as a major world power, with interests in every corner of the globe. Roosevelt became a hero

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now