¶ … Dismissed: How TV Frames the Working Class directed by Loretta Alper. Specifically it will evaluate how work and social class is perceived in this documentary film and other television shows. The working class always seems to be the brunt of negative humor and satire on television and this documentary explores that phenomenon, from the 1940s to the present day. If a person bases their opinions about the working class only on television, they will come to see an uneducated, group of buffoons who are entertaining but certainly not enlightening. Instead of poking fun at the working class, the media should acknowledge the contribution most working class families make to the American culture.
The film opens with the statistic that about 62% of Americans are members of the working class, and that means they are the average people you might meet on the street, stroll a shopping mall with, or dine with in a restaurant. They are the "average Joes" who form the backbone of the working force. So why does the media portray them so negatively? One, most of these shows that feature working class families and situations are comedies, so they are meant to make others laugh. Viewers, watching a dysfunction family like the Simpsons or the Bundys in "Married...
The subtle messages being sent by these shows is that the working class is woefully inadequate as mothers and fathers, their families are laughable, and they have no hope whatsoever of bettering themselves, and somehow, they are responsible for their own misfortunes because of ignorance or
laziness. Think of characters like Ralph Crandon in "The Honeymooners," Archie Bunker in "All in the Family," or Ted Bundy in "Married With Children." Each man is a clown who is loud, often bigoted, and laughable, with a long-suffering spouse who does not take them seriously. These represent decades of television shows that view the working class as something "less" than the
middle class, and that makes them laughable and "beneath" the viewers in some way.
Oddly, I think the working class is the audience, because they do not see themselves as the "working class," and, as noted before, somehow they feel like they are better than these fictional characters, and they have more "class" than these people do. It helps them feel better about themselves and their work. Look at the "Jerry Springer Show," which often showcases "trailer trash" working class people with spectacular problems, and they often interact with the audience, which all seems to be working class people, too. This
audience is interested in the guest's sex lives, personal lives, and problems and they seem to identify with them, even when they condemn them.
Language is quite different in these shows and these situations. In Jerry Springer, for example, the audience and the guests often swear and are bleeped out, indicating to the viewer that they have few
communication skills, and could not possibly belong to the middle…