(Chapter II)
Herodotus admires the practical as well as the religious achievements of Egypt, however. "Now if the Nile should choose to divert his waters from their present bed into this Arabian Gulf, what is there to hinder it from being filled up by the stream within, at the utmost, twenty thousand years... Thus I give credit to those from whom I received this account of Egypt, and am myself, moreover, strongly of the same opinion, since I remarked that the country projects into the sea further than the neighboring shores," (Chapter II) He even gives Egypt this final credit, in comparison to Greek "The Egyptians, they went on to affirm, first brought into use the names of the twelve gods, which the Greeks adopted from them; and first erected altars, images, and temples to the gods; and also first engraved upon stone the figures of animals. (Chapter II)
But always Herodotus is anxious to act as a guide of morals, values, and judgment as a historian rather than simply laying out the facts. Also, although his eyewitness accounts might be accurate, many of the stories he relates were merely told to him. The memories of these people could have been faulty, and probably they had a similarly flexible attitude to the facts, to the difference (or lack thereof) between myth and history and faith. The notable religiosity of the Egyptians might mean that Herodotus' sources had an even more flexible attitude.
It might be also argued that the "Father of History" does critique his audience as well as Egypt. However he uses the difference in Egypt as a rebuke to his Greeks to make a policy statement, about his own point-of-view of where Greece should be 'going' as a nation, rather than to make an objective comparison. For instance,...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now