Verified Document

Slavery In America -- Three Compromises, All Term Paper

Slavery in America -- Three Compromises, All Compromised Wrong -- the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Compromise of 1850 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men were created equal" -- except for Black American men, of course, who are only 3/5ths equal, according to the Constitution of the United States. The ringing words about equality, penned by Jefferson, a guilty-minded slaveholder sound far less inspiring when wording from the actual text of the Constitution of the framers is incorporated into the text of the Declaration of Independence that he authored in 1776.

The 3/5ths compromise sounds bizarre simply on its surface -- it stated that enslaved human beings would count, for taxation and population counts for the Electoral College, as 3/5ths of a person. The conflict reflects one of the central problems of the Constitutional Convention. The convention was torn between the desire between the value the American Southern states placed upon state's rights and the Northern states' desire to have a stronger federal government that could curtail and limit the spread of the Southern way of life and the South's so-called peculiar institution. (Slavery Compromises, 2004)

The South, however, believed that slaves should count in their influence in Congress, even if these slaves were treated as chattel and could not vote. Thus, despite the fact even the slaveholding Jefferson, as well as the other founding fathers believed slavery to be...

The spirit of the Master is abating," the compromise was included to placate the Southern states. (Notes on the State of Virginia, Jefferson; "Slavery Compromises," 2004)
Thus, slavery was incorporated into the constitution in an absurdity -- legally and logically -- and as a compromise that pleased no one. Even at the time, Jefferson said, "We have the wolf by the ears, and we can neither hold him nor safely let him go. Justice is on one scale, and self- preservation in the other." But because "Cotton is King!" As Hammond of South Carolina countered, the compromise was allowed to stand -- at least while America remained, North and South, largely agrarian and thus more sympathetic to the Southern economic needs.

But while the North and the South were conflicted politically over the strength of the federal government from 1776-1819, the industrialization of the North and expansion to the West from 1820-1850 pushed the two regions still further. The Missouri Compromise came into being 1820 when many of the people who had helped settle that new territory were slave owners and wished to keep their slaves after Missouri became a state, despite Congress' avowed intent to prevent the spread of slavery. It had been argued that even if the South could not be bankrupted for the good of the national economy, at least the spread of slavery could be…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

"Bushong, Mary. "Compromises of 1820 and 1850." ED Helper Website. 7 Dec 2004.

http://www.edhelper.com/ReadingComprehension_35_11.html

'Slavery Compromises." 2004. 7 Slavery: A History of America Website, maintained by the University of Louisiana. Dec 2004.

http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~ras2777/amgov/slavery2.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

The Great Compromise the Virginia and New Jersey Plans
Words: 666 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, the Great Compromise, and the Three-Fifths Compromise lead our current form of Congress? 300 words The Virginia Plan, the New Jersey and Plan and the Great Compromise all essentially contributed to the way in which Congress is today by setting the parameters of representation. The Virginia Plan was put forward by John Adams and basically urged that Congress should consists of representatives that were

Great Gatsby, Acknowledged As a
Words: 920 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Even after Daisy commits murder, Gatsby remains unmoved in his emotions towards her. What's more, he assumes responsibility for her actions. Or consider the statement: ' Of course she might have loved him, just for a minute, when they were first married -- and loved me more even then, do you see?' (Fitzgerald, p. 133). Gatsby clings to this hope despite Daisy's professed loved her husband. Such explanations indicate

Great Depression New Deal Voices Protest in
Words: 2084 Length: 8 Document Type: Case Study

Great Depression New Deal Voices Protest In this essay, the author will discuss the importance of Huey Long and Father Coughlin in shaping the course of the New Deal. Since Brinkley also mentions Charles Townsend's social security ideas, it will also be necessary to consider them as well. It is the author's position that Alan Brinkley is largely correct that these individuals forced the president Franklin Delano Roosevelt to move left

Great Depression of 1929 Vs.
Words: 3030 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Paper

These two factors would cause the economy to experience a sudden erosion of economic stability. At which point, a new Administration would begin: massive spending and enacting various regulations to address the causes of the Great Depression. This would help to provide stability to: the economy and it created a foundation for placing some kind of support in the different economic structures (i.e. banks / the stock market). What

Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald
Words: 1561 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

He is so enraged by the way she died, with the driver not even stopping to try to help her, that he determines that God wants him to kill the driver. If this event had not happened, George would have known that murder for any reason was wrong. George, however, has been blinded by grief. In the end, all the characters have demonstrated moral ambiguity. Gatsby has made his money

Constitutional Compromises: Reforming the Articles
Words: 949 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Northern states hoped that slavery would eventually prove unprofitable and wanted the Constitution to ban the (external) slave trade. This would not have banned slavery outright, merely banned the import of new slaves. The Constitution gave congress the power to ban the slave trade only 1808, presumably to give the southern economy time to 'adjust' or to determine how necessary the trade was to the economy in the future. Also,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now