Responses to Gray and Quentalla
Gray
I agree with your viewpoint. The use of community-based correctional treatment programs indeed often proves more effective than traditional incarceration, particularly for juveniles. The concept is rooted in understanding the underlying causes of delinquency and addressing these issues holistically. It is essential to acknowledge that many young people who end up in the criminal justice system come from challenging backgrounds, often characterized by factors such as poverty, family instability, poor education, and lack of access to vital resources and opportunities.
Community-based programs offer a range of services, including counseling, substance abuse treatment, vocational training, and educational support, all geared towards addressing the root causes of delinquency. If we focus on the individual's personal development and integration within society, we can create an environment conducive to positive growth and change. This holistic approach often reduces recidivism rates and allows juveniles to become more productive, contributing members of society.
Quentalla
I 100% agree: community-based correctional programs can indeed provide a more effective alternative to traditional incarceration. They not only help reduce recidivism but also have the potential to be more cost-effective. Overcrowding is a significant issue in many prisons, and community-based programs can provide a solution to this problem. Moreover, they allow offenders to maintain a connection to their communities, which can play a crucial role in their rehabilitation and reintegration process.
The opportunity for offenders to acquire skills and credentials for employment is a very important. Skills development can increase an individual's independence and self-sufficiency, and thereby reduce the likelihood of reoffending. This focus on rehabilitation and reentry aligns with the broader goals of justice, helping to facilitate personal growth and societal reintegration. However, I would only add that we have to make sure these programs are adequately resourced and monitored. There should also be appropriate support structures in place for those transitioning from these programs into full societal reintegration
Juveniles In basic terms, handling juvenile offenders remains the key purpose of juvenile courts. Hence these courts are designed not to punish but to treat and guide. However, though juvenile courts have been in operation for over a hundred years, some juvenile offenders still find themselves being tried in adult courts. The question that arises in this case is; should juvenile offenders go through the same criminal justice system as their
Juvenile offenders have grown to become a serious problem in many countries, especially the United States. Like adult offenders, juvenile offenders are more likely to reoffend, especially without the proper guidance and assistance they need in order to live a law abiding life. Research within the last five years has led to identification of specific program models as well theory-based intervention approaches that not only assist juvenile offenders in leading
Juvenile Offenders, an Intervention Analysis The challenge of juvenile offenders, what prompts them into crime and what factors contribute to the repeat of same misdemeanors that led them to the juvenile prison are issues that have for long attracted protracted discussions and even detailed researches. There has been little attention however given to the possible role of mentor programs in keeping the young people off crime. This research proposal hence looks
Crime Juvenile Offender in Hong Kong Juvenile Offenders Juvenile Offender in Hong Kong The increase in juvenile delinquency has become a world-wide phenomenon, especially in many developed countries. This trend is also evident in cities like Hong Kong and can be seen in a recent report which asserts that the age of juvenile offenders in Kong is getting younger. This study by Pang (2008) states that, "Some juvenile delinquents are now as young as
Missouri has seen a rise in African-America juveniles tried as adults. Statistics from 2009 state 64% of the juveniles tried as adults were of African-American descent. This is almost double of the amount in 2001 which was 36%. (Cooper) This brings to light an increase in racial disparity and the nature of prosecution in Missouri. Many of the cases of the African-American juvenile offenders certified as adults are prosecuted in
juvenile offenders' ability to understand their legal rights and one issue related to their ability to participate effectively in their own defense. Ability to understand legal rights: Competency Ability to participate effectively in their own defense: Treating juveniles differently According to U.S. criminal law, part of the right to counsel includes the notion that a defendant must be able to participate in his or her defense (Sandborn 2009: 137). However, schizophrenics, persons
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now