Verified Document

Skills-Based Pay Lawler And Ledford 1987 Argued Essay

Skills-Based Pay Lawler and Ledford (1987) argued twenty-six years ago that skill-based pay was going to become an increasingly popular concept in compensation management. Ledford and Heneman (2011) define skill-based pay as "a compensation system that rewards employees with additional pay in exchange for formal certification of the employee's mastery of skills, knowledge and/or competencies." The authors juxtapose this against a "job-based pay system," defined as a system where employees are entitled to receive their pay even if they are not proficient in their position.

There are two issues with the concept from the outset. The first is that employees should be proficient in their position, since they have been given that position. It makes little sense for an employee to remain in a position with no skills. Trotter (2013) notes that a person's skills and competencies contribute to them receiving the position, at least in any company where merit is taken into consideration. Where there are companies that do not take merit into consideration -- union shops that still use length of service as the primary method of determining promotions -- the problem is likely the system of allocating people into jobs, rather than the system of pay. Furthermore, if a person is experienced and otherwise qualified, usually the skill can be added quickly.

The second issue is that skill-based pay as described is not mutually exclusive to job-based pay. The term "additional pay" indicates that skills-based pay is a supplement to job-based pay, rather than a replacement for it. That said, the question skill remains as to whether there has been increased adoption of skills-based pay in the past quarter century.

Skill-Based Pay

The idea behind skill-based pay is that is...

The first is that that the organization is motivating its employees to add skills, using the opportunity to earn more money as the carrot (Ledford & Heneman, 2011). These authors note that skills-based pay is not a monolithic system, either, but a loose terminology for a number of different systems that when combined form one of the most widely-used compensation systems. Some systems reward employees for gaining greater depth, other systems reward employees for greater breadth in their education. In either concept, the type of training or skills is identified and assigned a pay premium, so that an employee will receive a raise once the skill or ability is acquired.
Employees typically will leverage the carrot, because the financial rewards provide sufficient incentive to increase one's skills. They are usually proactive in this endeavor, indicating that either the financial reward is strong, or that there is some intrinsic motivation involved as well. The mere presence of the financial reward provides some concept of what the company would want to see, so the employee pursues the training knowing what will be valued -- in other words the desire to train was pre-existing and the opportunity to earn extra simply taps into that pre-existing motivation that the employee already had.

Effectiveness of Skills-based Pay

The issue of skills-based pay has not been studied extensively, despite the concept having some legs in the human resources community. Hon (2012) notes that there might be a connection between the psychological needs of the employees and the effectiveness of skills-based compensation plans. Where employees are creative, they are often motivated by skills-based pay, because they will often feel that there…

Sources used in this document:
References

Giancola, F. (2011). Skill-based pay: Fad or classic? Compensation Benefits Review. Vol. 43 (4) 220-226.

Lawler, Edward E., III, & Ledford, Gerald E., Jr. (1987). Skill-based pay: A concept that's catching on. Management Review, 76(2), 46-46. Retrieved May 30, 2013

Ledford, G. & Heneman, H. (2011). Skill-based pay. Society for Human Resource Management. Retrieved December 6, 2013 from http://www.siop.org/userfiles/image/SIOP_SHRM_Skill_Based_Pay.pdf

Trotter. R. (2013). Skills-based pay structures vs. job-based pay structures. Rory Trotter.com. Retrieved December 6, 2013 from http://rorytrotter.com/2013/04/10/skill-based-pay-structures-versus-job-based-pay-structures/
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Merit Pay for Performance Is
Words: 4373 Length: 16 Document Type: Term Paper

Bonuses could also be earned by taking advanced courses in improving classroom techniques and by improving the scores their students achieved on state tests. These salary additions can add up to as much as $9,800 per year. In addition, teachers' pay can be docked if state testing demonstrates that their students have fallen too far below expectations (Philips & Tyre, 2007). The system has been so successful, that Denver has

Merit Pay the Advantages of
Words: 1760 Length: 6 Document Type: Thesis

On the other hand, merit pay systems may inspire unhealthy competition among coworkers or excessive peer pressure among teams of workers whose individual performance are measured together. In the worst case scenario, merit pay can result in unscrupulous conduct and undermine the camaraderie in the work environment to a degree that actually affects overall output negatively instead of positively. Certain vocational environments are more likely to benefit from merit pay

Merit Pay Teacher Performance Measured
Words: 2483 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

This involves "changing the role of school personnel in such a way that the resulting organization is capable of adapting the program of a given school to meet the needs of the child" (Conte, 1972) (finally, someone remembers that schools are about students not teachers). If the "objective of any reform measure is to increase the potential of the learning environment and facilitate the learning process" then creative ideas

Merit Pay Plans Incentive Pay Plans and Profit Sharing Plans As Motivators...
Words: 705 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Value of Merit-Based Plans, Incentive-Based Plans, and Profit Sharing Plans Merit-based payment plans, incentive-based payment plans, and company profit sharing plans all can be classified as organizational attempts to foster employee loyalty, increase employee productivity, and make the company a more attractive place to work. Their aim is to increase the motivation of employees to do quality work, above and beyond the expected minimum of the 'job description.' However, the

Public Administration the Merit Pay
Words: 6250 Length: 19 Document Type: Term Paper

This sentiment is echoed by a lot of supporters of merit pay who believe the way teachers are paid and how much they are paid must differ if districts are to attract a new cohort of teachers" (Drevitch, 2006). Some of the biggest disputes against merit pay have all been disputed previously, in the 1980's. In the 1980's, global rivalry was undermining U.S. businesses and corporations, and in an attempt

Pay for Performance
Words: 971 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Pay for performance is becoming commonplace in the business world. Pay raises and bonuses are often based on how well one performs on the job or on achieving specific results. However, this is not the case in education. Pay levels are typically based on years of experience and levels of education rather than on teacher effectiveness. As concerns about the quality of the nation's educational systems frequently appear in the

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now