Conflict Management Project Analysis
Were you surprised by the results of your conflict management style assessment? Why or why not? Explain.
I was not surprised by the results of my conflict management style assessment. The results depict my nature, behavior, and approach to conflicts. I endeavor to strike a balance between aspects revolving around conflicts. At times, I do not resist getting involved in a disagreement. Avoiding to back out from a conflict occurs as one of my pro-characteristics. I believe in effective ironing out issues through discussions, arguments. At the end of these arguments, there should result in a certain level of agreement between conflicting sides. The attribute of winning surpasses the attribute of backing out from an argument.
Encouraging open sharing of concerns and issues enables me to take decisively an angle of view that addresses my perspective on a certain subject. Despite my appetite for winning an argument, I endeavor to strike a mutually understanding solution in conflicts. At the end of any argument, how conflicting sides reach a common ground occurs as a critical aspect. In achieving this, I endeavor to strike a balance between the conflicting side and my side. Failing to back out of arguments enables me to tackle issues head-on without the fear of suppression of my point-of-view. The results, a vivid description of my nature occur as the considerable approach in conflict handling and resolution.
2. Were the scores for your primary and backup conflict handling styles relatively similar, or was there a large gap? What does this imply? Discuss.
The scores were relatively similar, a clear depiction of my results of conflict management style assessment. Comprising approach tops the list. It implies moderate cooperation and assertiveness in dealing with conflicts. Unlike other schools of view with the perspective that compromising entails giving up one's ambitions, it depicts a win-win for conflicting parties. At the end of an argument, I believe...
Conflict Resolution It is common knowledge that the utilization of conflict resolution offers the essential plans to cut down arguments and encourages nonviolent clarifications. Melinda G. Lincoln (2001) elaborates on this point by asserting, "Diffusing heated arguments, identifying issues, setting emotions aside, and learning new ways to communicate enables the disputants to incorporate the processes and problem-solving skills of mediation, negotiation, and collaboration. The impact of illustrating, modeling, and blending conflict
However, such strategy has the outcome in compliance in absence of commitment and feelings of frustration and resentment. The fourth strategy is I lose a little, you win a little. The placate yield style represents a concern for the effects of conflict on the welfare and durability of all relationships that is entered. The hypothesis is that human relationships are so flexible that they cannot endure the trauma of working
Conflict Management in the Workplace Conflicts have become increasingly inevitable in the contemporary working environment because of the diverse nature of the workforce. Actually, the modern workplace is a hub of diverse cultures largely because of globalization. Globalization has contributed to workplace diversity through facilitating increased migration of people who are looking for better market opportunities, personal development, and new challenges (Prause & Mujtaba, 2015, p.13). These changes have generated numerous
Conflict Resolution The objective of this study is to examine conflict resolution and to describe a situation where conflict resolution has been encountered related to nursing and how the situation was handled. This work in writing will identify any patterns of behavior and the applicable of patterns to any other conflict situations and provide supporting evidence. Steps that could be taken to improve the situation will be outlined as well as
In keeping with the collaboration of HR and leaders across the organization, more communicative, open structures to conflict resolution perform more effectively than autocratic ones (Carmeli, Atwater, Levi, 2011). The ability to emerge from conflict with greater trust is a major difference between transactional, autocratic or transformational leaders managing conflict resolution strategies. The idea is to use conflict as a galvanizing force in getting the organization to its goals. Autocratic
Conflict Resolution in Work Teams When managers speak of teamwork, they usually have a vague mental picture of individuals in polite discussion. They may envision people willingly assisting others from a different part of the organization. Such groups or behaviors may or may not constitute teamwork. True teams exhibit a high level of social structure. Their members have specific behaviors that move the group towards specific goals. We often mistake an absence
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now