Once the suspect is "the accused," and the right to counsel has been attached, the suspect cannot be interrogated by any means, including by undercover officers or secretive means. Only when the suspect openly volunteers information and waives a lawyer, can information after he is "the accused" be used against him or her. This even applies when a suspect is out of jail on bail awaiting trial. These methods cannot be used to obtain additional evidence, or the Sixth Amendment will be violated, and the evidence will not hold up in court. In addition, officers must know the suspect's condition and status at all times, and if they do not, they must assume the suspect falls under Sixth Amendment rights. Obviously, there are several precautions necessary when dealing with the thorny problems of the Sixth Amendment. Officers must be constantly aware of the suspect's rights, and of the moment when the suspect becomes "the accused," as so attaches to the Sixth Amendment. Officers must take extreme precautions to administer Miranda, admit an attorney, and make absolutely sure a suspect has indeed fully waived his right to counsel when questioning any suspect. It must be remembered that interrogation and the Sixth Amendment is just one aspect of the Amendment. Its' purpose is to guarantee a fair and speedy trial for all accused, and following the Sixth Amendment to the letter helps this goal. This, law enforcement...
The Supreme Court notes, "any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him"
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution covers the protection of the individual from unlawful searches and seizures when in the privacy of their own home. Because of the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement officers are required to secure an official court order or warrant to search the premises, and that warrant must be based on probable cause. Although the Fourth Amendment does protect against the intrusion onto private property, there are several exceptions
Hearsay evidence and the Confrontation Clause of Amendment VI. The main objective of the American constitutional provision under study was: prevention of ex-parte affidavit deposition, which was employed against prisoners in place of personal questioning and cross-questioning of witnesses. (CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Sixth Amendment). The main objectives that this paper will look at include: The confrontation right is one among the basic assurances of liberty and life The 6th Amendment's Confrontation Clause assures
Hearsay evidence and the Confrontation Clause of Amendment VI. The main objective of the American constitutional provision under study was: prevention of ex-parte affidavit deposition, which was employed against prisoners in place of personal questioning and cross-questioning of witnesses. (CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Sixth Amendment). The main objectives that this paper will look at include: The confrontation right is one among the basic assurances of liberty and life The 6th Amendment's Confrontation Clause assures
Amendments from the Bill of Rights in U.S. amendments 1st amendment 5th amendment 8th amendment Policy necessary for police investigators when interrogating suspect Type of crime Constitutional right upheld Rationale of the policy Evaluation of the policy Foreign policy dealing with the same issue Subject country Policy name in the country Components Evaluation of the policy Amendments from the Bill of Rights in U.S. 1st Amendment This Amendment has prohibited the making of any law with respect of religion establishment, obstructing a free practice of religion, reducing
' Schmerber, 384 U.S. At 772, 769-70. In other words, the burden on law enforcement officers is high if they want to perform a search within the Fourth Amendments' protections. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no American "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Confessions are inherently suspect, and methods of getting confessions have not always been reliable. In modern times, police forces have professional
Hostage Negotiation The 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments have had serious impacts on modern hostage negotiations and will be examined in this paper. Elements that are to be considered include promise making, incriminating statements, as well as the planting of listening devices. Graham vs. Connor, State vs. Sands, and Taylor vs. Watters, among others, are some of the court cases that will be used in this discussion. Again, the impact of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now