Freud Civilization and Its Discontents
Humankind strives for happiness, but according to Sigmund Freud, the creation of civilization as a means to further this goal has instead generated unhappiness. In his book Civilization and its Discontents, Freud asserts the happiness of the individual is often sublimated to the need for civilization to establish law and order. People have an instinctual desire for absolute freedom which includes a need to be sexually promiscuous as well as to be violent. To repress these naturally occurring human instincts and create an orderly society, humans have turned to civilization. But in doing so, humans have also created the source of their unhappiness; they are no longer allowed to act in a manner that is instinctually natural. By repressing their natural urges, humans are civilized, but live in a continual state of discontent.
In his analysis of civilization and why so many of its members are unhappy, Freud begins with what many consider a feeling of happiness, what he calls the "oceanic" feeling many associate with religious faith. While fully accepting that such feeling exist within individuals, he attributes them to a person's ego interacting with the outside world. Most of the time the ego, or the rational and intellectual part of the mind, maintains a clear line between the individual and the outside world. This line must be maintained in order to protect the individual from the pain and suffering associated with the world in general. However, at certain times, particularly during moments of religious fervor, this line between the ego and the outside world blurs, and Freud asserts that this is the source of the sense of "eternity, a feeling as of something limitless, unbounded, something 'oceanic'." (Freud 2)
Freud next explains that the creation of the ego is synonymous with the creation of a line of separation between the ego and the outside world. As an individual's ego develops, they also develop an aversion to the pain of the world outside. But if this separation developed, then there must have been a time when there was no separation, early in the individual's development. At this time, when a person was infantile, they relied completely on a sense of paternal protection; a feeling that continues into adult life. Strangely, Freud then retracts his earlier comments on the "oceanic" feeling being a blurring of the line created between the ego and the outside world, and instead maintains that it is a desire to "reinstate limitless narcissism…," associated with a childhood state of development. (Freud 5)
Once Freud identifies the "oceanic" feeling of happiness with the individual's desire to be in a state of protection by an all powerful father figure, he then turns his attention toward religion. Freud makes no effort to hide his disdain for organized religion, what he asserts is "patently infantile, [and] incongruous with reality…." (Freud 5) He claims that, while seeming to hold the answers to the meaning of life, religion does not contribute to human happiness. When it comes to happiness, it is the "pleasure-principle" which regulates an individual's happiness; the satisfaction of needs brings pleasure, which in turn brings happiness. Alternatively, suffering brings unhappiness, and can come from three sources: our own body, the outer world, and our relations with other human beings. As an individual's body becomes injured, sick, or just less active with age, comes anxiety and pain. The outside world contains all sorts of dangers and destructive possibilities that just existing in the world can be a source of pain and suffering. And finally, interactions between people can be the greatest source of pain and misery ranging from the pain associated with the love of an individual to the wars affecting entire populations.
Civilization, therefore, is the source of humankind's suffering and misery, and Freud asserts that there are three historic events that have produced discontent with civilization. First was the establishment of Christianity over paganism and the focus Christianity places on the afterlife instead of earthly life. Second came the European discovery and conquest of primitive peoples around the globe who seemed to be living in happiness due to their closeness to nature. And finally, the scientific breakthroughs which have identified the mechanism of neuroses caused by social demands. (Freud 13) This would seem to indicate that people are more happy when living in primitive, uncivilized society that are more in tune with nature and the natural world. The modern world's technological advances also seem to worsen the situation that humans find themselves in. Technology is created to ease the suffering of humankind,...
Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents: Why does Freud think life is hard for human beings? people likely to be happier in a civilized or uncivilized state? What are the benefits of order? Why is civilization hostile to sexuality? How does civilization inhibit aggression? Freud's central paradigm is that the tension between the individual and civilization is historically grounded in the violence of warfare and humanity in the early part of
Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche both addressed the concept of human nature and of the society in which human nature are bound by. However due to their different approaches on the matter, they formulated totally different theories for each. This paper endeavours to explore their theories behind human nature, the impact of the world they were living in at the time, religion and approaching utopia through Freud's Civilization and its
Freud Civilization and Its Discontents Sigmund Freud's volume, Civilization and its Discontents, he tackles no less than the broad and ambitious concept of man's place in the world. In this volume, he looks at culture from his unique psychoanalytical perspective, and touches upon a number of important concepts, including aggression, civilization and the individual, organized religion, the death drive and Eros, and the super-ego and conscience. Civilization and its Discontents was
.. But they seem to have observed that this newly-won power over space and time, this subjugation of the forces of nature, which is the fulfillment of a longing that goes back thousands of years, has not increased the amount of pleasurable satisfaction which they may expect from life and has not made them feel happier." This insight then, marked the point in which he asserted that in order for
Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Max Weber (1864-1920) were the distinguished German scholars of their time and both of them individually contributed a great deal in the understanding of society and its paraphernalia. There is not much to compare between the two scholars apart from the fact they both were Germans and prominent sociologists. Karl Marx is regarded as the founder of 'socialism'. He was a great philosopher and intellectual. His
Heidiegger Camus Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time" addresses both of these complex philosophical concepts, being and time. Being means existence, or the fact that something can exist. Heidegger approaches the concept of being from multiple perspectives. Being is the quality of existence, or the fact that something exists. Does this mean the opposite of Being is Nothingness? What does Heidegger say about anti-matter? Heidegger also probes the force that causes a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now