Drinking Age
There has been a lot of debate whether the legal drinking age should be lowered or not. The Federal Uniform Drinking Age Act was passed in 1984. This law was passed to increase the legal drinking age from 18 to 21. There has been a mixed reaction over this act. There are some people who support it while there are others who oppose it. Opponents of this law believe that the federally imposed drinking law is unconstitutional. They believe that the rights of the states were overridden. However it is noted that the drive to increase the legal drinking age was made by citizen groups. The public also supported the 1984 Drinking Age act.
Teenagers usually drink as an act of rebellion. When a teenager turns 18, he/she is allowed to vote, hold public office, serve on a jury, serve in the military and hold public office. Therefore they feel that they have the right to decide for themselves if they want a drink or not.
Underage Drinking
Critics believe that the federal government has no right to take such a decision. Wheelan and Kenkel are two opponents of the current minimum age law. Kenkel proposes imposing a teen tax on alcohol, as it could be a more viable option than age restriction. He believes that it would cheaper to lower the minimum age rather than denying them the right to drink. A teen tax would be as effective as a minimum age law. It would allow an "adult" to maintain his/her civil liberties. The revenue from the teen tax could be used for alcohol abuse education.
Wheelan feels that teenagers can be easily tempted by alcohol, as it is one of their first steps towards adolescence. This could lead to grave consequences. Recent studies have proved that cases of alcohol abuse and driving accidents have risen drastically due to the adverse effect of drinking age laws. Experts believe that it is important to have a drinking age law for the sake of national health and safety.
It would be a wise decision to lower the drinking age to 18. According to wheelan, a college-age teen would most likely want to spend their evenings in clubs and bars. However they would not be able to get access to alcohol in...
Legal Drinking Age The drinking age at 21 in the United States is draconian, placing our country on par with the most socially repressed in the world. "Most drinking ages worldwide are at maximum 18, if not less, which makes sense for legal drinking ages. And provided you act like a grown up, you can probably be served a cerveza with that fish taco anywhere, regardless of age," (Crislip). I have
MLDA Legal Drinking Age in the U.S. Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) legislation aims to reduce alcohol use among those under 21, to prevent traffic deaths, and to avoid other negative outcomes. The minimum drinking age is a controversial issue in the United States today, and many recent efforts have aimed to reduce or qualify the minimum legal age at which drinking may occur. If these attempts are successful, the minimum drinking
Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered to 18 RESOLVED: At present the minimum legal drinking age of 21 years of age is controlled by the federal government by means of federal highway funds. This strips states of their right to self-govern and the higher MLDA is inconsistent with other rights allowed 18-year-olds. PRO: In favor of lowering the minimum legal drinking age to 18 years of age Premise 1: studies showing a decline
America, when a person reaches the age of 18 he can die for his country, obtain credit, get married, get divorced and be charged in criminal court. By all appearances the age of 18 sets the stage for adulthood and all that it entails. In a curious contradiction to that, however, America insists on maintaining a drinking age of 21 years old. While 18-year-olds can do all of the
Lowering Drinking Age in the United States The drinking age in the United States has been 21 years old since 1984 because it was enacted in law. However, in the past few years, there have been numerous calls to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18 years. These calls have generated significant controversy and concern throughout the country since the issue can be approached from two general paradigms that shape
The question isn't whether there should be controls, but which controls work best. What has proven around the world to work best is a combination of reasonable laws backed by strong social sanctions. But in the U.S. we treat our emerging adults as infants and get infantile behavior as a result…if adults would learn to temper their patronizing attitudes toward young men and women, more maturity, self-restraint, and social
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now