As a representative I take responsibility for the deaths of these animals and would like to cooperate with those harmed to help them feel like justice was done. Unlike the three options in the instructions, I would not say I only had $100,000 to divide up among the families but I would not reveal my bottom line, because that is an appropriate tactic. I would also do my homework and research how much money has been awarded to other individuals in similar cases.
Question TWO: To assure that the negotiation was conducted fairly, I would employ all five of the standards: reciprocity (I'd want to be treated fairly); universality (I would want to be a role model for others); publicity (I would want my good faith bargaining strategy to be publicized); trusted friend (telling a close friend I was ethical would be easy); and the legacy standard (yes I would want to be recalled as a tough but fair and ethical negotiator).
Question THREE: It would be ethical and perfectly reasonable to hide my bottom line ($250,000) from the families; you don't have to show all your cards to be ethical...
The insistence is that the procedures that led to the end result were all followed fairly and there was no unfair means adopted in the hearings and negotiations. Thinkers are of the opinion that substantive fairness in contracts is simply pseudo-problems. Thus to the persons who think of fairness and not conducting and unconscionable bargain or having the negotiation done with proper procedures would be sustentative fairness. That the
Lawsuit The Snow Storm Lawsuit Identify and explain at least three legal considerations. - falls - death due to improper medication weak disaster preparedness plan The main issue in this case is the snow storm. Is it the hospital's responsibility to maintain the level of care that they had previously promised when a natural occurrence causes a lack of staff? According to Medicare law and the World Health Organization, both agencies which protect the rights of
Actions Lawsuits in Employment Sex-Discrimination Lawsuits: When are they Appropriate? The class action lawsuit is a somewhat controversial tool, particularly in the case of employment discrimination. In many ways, it is a hallmark of judicial efficiency. After all, if a number of plaintiffs have the same claim against a defendant, it is inefficient to try the same case a number of times. Moreover, later plaintiffs may be unable to recover
Business Lawsuits Summarize the actions that lead to the lawsuit. The actions that lead to the lawsuit are from an Ace Hardware franchisee alleging that they were defrauded by the company. What happened is Roy and Pattie Ewers are suing based on the fact that the company deceived them into buying a well-known hardware store in Northern Virginia (named Fisher Hardware). The basic idea is that the Ewers' would make an initial
This process improvement is implied in the manufacturing and the upper-level management changes, and should be prioritized as such. Another manufacturing process that Toyota needs to address and which is implicit in the previously mentioned manufacturing process is its increasing propensity to utilize parts suppliers outside of its keiretsu, which loosely translates into headless combination (No author, 2009). Keiretsu is a Japanese term for the tiered hierarchy of additional companies
TOYOTA Process improvements Toyota: Case study What exactly needs to be improved? The Toyota Corporation built its reputation upon safety and quality. Based upon its perceived superiority to its competitors, particularly its American competitors, the Japanese carmaker had established itself as 'benchmark' of excellence in the international marketplace. All of this began to change in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Toyota's safety was questioned after a series of highly-publicized recalls. In particular, the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now