Introduction
The text of Luke 14:16-21 tells the parable of the great banquet. The host of the banquet tells his servant to invite the guests—but the guests have various excuses for why they cannot come. The host becomes angry and commands his servant to “go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and bring in the poor, the crippled, the blind and the lame,” and they shall be the guests at the banquet. The meaning of this text is simple: it alludes to the question regarding why Jesus would “eat with sinners” (Lk 15:2) instead of rejecting them the way the Pharisees did. Jesus came to the Jews and it was the Jews who rejected Him because He did not fit their idea of what a Savior should be. They expected an Earthly or worldly savior—one who would lift them out of their subservient position beneath the Roman State and give them a Kingdom on Earth. Christ preached His kingdom in Heaven, obtained through humility and service to the will of God—proclaimed through one’s love of God and through one’s love of neighbor (Mk 12:30-31). This paper will provide an exegetical outline of the message to be prepared when delivering a sermon on this text.
Exegesis
The context in which the parable of the great banquet is situated is that of Christ’s back-and-forth with the Pharisees—the Jewish leaders who set themselves in opposition to Christ’s teaching of mercy and to the good works that Christ was doing in healing the sick and forgiving sinners. The Pharisees routinely tried to trap and ensnare Christ and get Him to invalidate His cause. They pointed out that He kept company with sinners and went to their houses whereas they, who were “righteous,” would never do such a thing. As Luke shows in 14:11, leading up to the parable of the great banquet, Christ insists on humility—not pride—for there is no way by which a proud man may get to Heaven. Pride is for people on Earth who seek to set themselves up over others and be thought of as great and to be admired by all. The Pharisees were filled with such pride and it contrasted sharply with Our Lord’s humility.
Christ did not set out to oppose the Pharisees. He set out to be the Redeemer of the Chosen People—the Jews. But upon extending the invitation to His great banquet in Heaven, they refused Him and gave various excuses—just like the invited guests in the parable. Thus, Our Lord, like the host in the parable, turned to others because it was the will of God that Heaven be filled. If the Jews would not come in the manner that God desired them, then God would invite others who would.
This parable carries a special weight because it is told by Luke. It exists in the Gospel genre and is in the sub-group Parable, but Luke serves as a significant message giver in that he was a Gentile himself—i.e., a non-Jew. His background was said to be in medicine and for that reason there is a special quality of love and mercy in his character, as one who practices medicine is one who desires to heal others and save the sick. Luke is thus a fitting representative of the particular message being communicated in this parable. But greater context can be obtained by analyzing the greater text in which it occurs.
The parable of the great banquet is actually told in the house of one of the leaders of the Pharisees. This shows that Christ was not avoiding the Pharisees or seeking to deny them their invitation—their part in the “good news” of salvation. The leader invited him to eat on the Sabbath in his house, and Christ accepted the invitation. He wanted the Pharisees to accept His invitation to them to adopt humility rather than pride and seek the Kingdom of God in Heaven.
This is the reason that Christ stops on the way to the Pharisee’s house to heal a man with dropsy (Lk 14:1-6). Christ asks the Pharisees if it is lawful to heal on the Sabbath and they do not know what to say because they do not want to validate Our Lord’s message. So they say nothing. Christ does not disparage them, but heals the sick man, then continues on to the house of the leader of the Pharisees. When he arrives there he notices how the guests are...
References
Fabarez, M. (2002). Preaching that changes lives. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson
Lloyd-Jones, D.M. (2011). Preaching and preachers. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan
Vines, J. & Shaddix, J. (1999). Power in the pulpit. Moody Press
However, although Machiavelli held firm in his belief that the Church should not have the same governing functions as the State, he provided the example of Pope Julius in demonstrating how, if a religious leader holds firm to his beliefs and manner of disciplining his clergy, he can establish a strong clergy and can yield influence and power over the State and civil society. In describing Pope Julius's leadership style,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now