Moreover, it allowed financial institutions to escape some degree of punishment by investors by recording values for bad assets that are unrealistic. This could be viewed as contributing to stronger short-term stock prices, but also to longer-term problems as companies continue to record higher asset levels than they actually possess.
Overall, the SEC has accomplished little thus far in terms of the financial crisis. The outcome of the agency's work on improving governance and board member standards for financial institutions will be the final determinant of the agency's performance with regards to the crisis. During the leadup to the crisis and its initial impacts, there was little that the SEC could have done within its mandate and with the tools supplied to it by Congress to prevent the crisis or to curtail its impacts. By defending against short-selling and market manipulation, the SEC performed well and controlled some of the irrational market behavior. This reduced some of the damage that could have occurred, as stock prices fell more slowly than they otherwise would have during the fall of 2008.
There are changes that the SEC can make, however, to position itself better to deal with future crises. The agency took significant criticism, including a famous rebuke by then-Presidential candidate John McCain. This left the SEC in the position of having to defend itself for not taking action that, in fact, it has little power to take. Thus the first change recommended to the SEC is that the agency petition Congress for more powers to deal with boards that allow institutions, especially financial institutions, to carry too much risk. The SEC may have power to deal with the issue after the fact, but it needs to gain the power to address the issue beforehand.
The second recommendation for the SEC is that the agency takes a proactive approach to explaining its mandate. The agency comes under such fire because the public knows little about the scope of its mandate. That the SEC has a specific, limited mandate and limited powers to enforce that mandate is not well-known among the general public.
The financial crisis was not the SEC's fault. The agency's mandate is written to sound proactive but the tools the SEC has at its disposal are largely punitive measures to be taken after an investigation finds a firm guilty of impropriety. If the SEC wants to have a more proactive impact, it needs to petition Congress for better tools. With the tools the SEC has at its disposal, it performed well during the crisis. The stock market was going to fall sharply no matter what the SEC did, but by curtailing the impacts of investors seeking to profit from market panic, the agency reduced the intensity of the stock market slide and allowed it to stabilize more quickly.
Works Cited:
No author. (2009). The investor's advocate: How the SEC protects investors, maintains market integrity and facilitates capital formation. SEC.gov. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml
Francis, T. (2008). SEC's Cox catches blame for financial crisis. Business Week. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/sep2008/db20080918_764469.htm?campaign_id=rss_daily
Goldfarb, Z. (2009). SEC to examine board's role in financial crisis. Washington Post. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/02/19/ST2009021903215.html
Sibun, J. (2008). Financial crisis: SEC cheers finance companies with mark-to-market ruling. The Telegraph. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/financialcrisis/3115730/Financial-crisis-SEC-cheers-finance-companies-with-mark-to-market-ruling.html
Fraud Examination Introduction The Securities Exchange Commission issued a ruling on its website against Panasonic Corporation. It had investigated the company for violations under Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the investigation resulted in a cease-and-desist order. This paper will walk through the case, analyzing the facts and the ruling that was made. Major Facts of the Case The case against Panasonic concerns "violations of anti-bribery, anti-fraud, books and records,
Legislative Process Federal mandates are orders from a central government that require compliance by state and local governments and individuals. Many times, mandates are signed into law "without the federal funds to support their execution" (Zaretsky 5). Additionally, mandates can be divided into different categories and require compliance by different agencies, companies, or individuals. One fairly recent mandate stems from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which was signed
Regulatory and Compliance Auditors, consultants and security professional owe to their clients stakeholders a duty of care in the performance of their duties. The duty of care requires these professionals to observe prudence in all circumstances regarding their actions and evaluations (Boynton & Johnson, 2006). Contribution of the PCAOB towards Independence of Auditors of Public Companies It is sometimes ignored the contributions made by PCAOB towards improving corporate governance in public companies by
Sarbanes-Oxley. The political pressure of the past several years following the dot.com bubble and the collapse of several major companies created a need for new securities legislation, which culminated last year in the Sarbanes-Oxley Investor Protection Act, which establishes new guidelines for the securities industry. Initially a Democratic brainchild, the act became favored by Republicans in the House when it was realized that such adjustments would be of great benefit to
conflict of interest is at the core of nearly every ethical dilemma. A conflict of interest, simply put, is a situation in which the decision maker has two or more competing interests. Market timing, late trading, insider trading, illegal trading, fraud, partial disclosure, non-disclosure...the manifestation of conflicts of interest is seemingly endless. The business landscape today is a minefield of ethical disasters, some of which have already occurred, some
1-6 Summary The accounting convergence project of the FASB and IASB has proceeded slowly, despite a new deadline of 2014 from the SEC. There remain several key issues that are bogging down the conversion process. This dissertation will outline where American public companies stand on this issue. It will attempt to ascertain how much they understand about the convergence process and how prepared they are for full conversion to international financial
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now