¶ … Scores
Generally speaking, a set of test scores such as those provided would not be considered continuous data, as in most test scenarios there are a finite number of scores possible. If a test has 100 questions and is worth one point per question, then the only possible scores are those whole numbers from 0 to 100 -- a finite set of responses rather than an infinitely reducible continuum. In order for this data set to be considered continuous, it would need to be demonstrated that partial points were possible to a degree that enabled a full continuum of scores to be presented.
As the data set represents test scores, it must certainly be considered at least an interval scale, with the two point difference between 79 and 81 the same interval as the two points between 97 and 99. It can also be inferred that these are percentages, and that a score of 0% would be possible, and the existence of this zero would give each score on the scale an absolute position to be related to, making this a ratio scale. As this is a higher order of measurement, more meaningful analysis can be made regarding the distribution of the data. An examination of the accompanying chart and graph make certain basic elements of this data set clear.
For such a small data set, there is a fair amount of central tendency, with the mean, median, and mode all relatively tightly clustered from 80 to 84.5. Variance is somewhat large, with a standard deviation of more than 6 in a range of only 22, but again with such a small data set and limited range this is not too unexpected. There is a slight skew to the left when only the range of achieved scores is examined, though if the chart were expanded to include the full range of possible scores (0 to 100) there would be a very strong skew to the right. Kurtosis is not too extreme, and is cut by the spike at the top end of the scores.
Test Score Analysis
SCORES:
SUM. STATS:
76
77
Mean:
84.5
79
Median:
82.5
79
Mode:
80
79
80
Range:
22
81
Std. Dev:
Administering the tests developed and formulated for the nursing-based curriculum entails providing reliable test items. Reliability is important because it helps counteract human error both on the part of the student taking the test and the person grading the test. "Reliability is the quality of a test which produces scores that are not affected much by chance. Students sometimes randomly miss a question they really knew the answer to or
OCR recognizes that colleges and universities are under a lot of legal and political pressure to stop using racial and ethnic factors in admission," Clegg commented. "[In response,] the agency wants to intimidate colleges and universities to continue using these preferences." (Black Issues in Higher Education, 1999) The National Association of Scholars, while raising doubts about the reasoning behind the OCR document titled "Nondiscrimination in High-Stakes Testing," pointed to what it
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test Intelligence testing began in earnest in France. The French Government commissioned Alfred Binet in 1904 "to find a method to differentiate between children who were intellectually normal and those who were inferior." (Strydom and Du Plessis, 2004) This early form of intelligence testing was not scaled -- a child either passed or was placed into a special school where he or she would receive more appropriate instruction. (Strydom
The trainer will then focus on the steps to be taken to develop new skills. For example, if the trainer wants to talk about motivating, leading, negotiating, selling or speaking, it is best to start with what the learners do well before showing some chart on Maslow's theory, Posner's leadership practices, or selling skills from some standard package that has been develop elsewhere. Many foreign trainers make grave errors
Thus, efforts aimed at helping teachers to avoid harmful stereotyping of students often begin with activities designed to raise teachers' awareness of their unconscious biases." (1989) Cotton goes on the relate that there are specific ways in which differential expectations are communicated to students according to the work of: "Brookover, et al. (1982); Brophy (1983); Brophy and Evertson (1976); Brophy and Good (1970); Cooper and Good (1983); Cooper and
Adolescent Substance Use Screening Instruments: 10-Year Critical Review of the Research Literature Over ten million teenagers in the United States admit in a national survey that they drink alcohol, although it is illegal under the age of 21 in all states. In some studies, nearly one-quarter of school-age children both smoked cigarettes and drank alcohol. Over four thousand adolescents every day try marijuana for the first time. The dangers of use,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now