Women have made advances toward the equality they seek only to encounter a backlash in the form of religious fundamentalism, claims of reverse discrimination by males, and hostility from a public that thinks the women's movement has won everything it wanted and should thus now be silent. Both the needs of women today and the backlash that has developed derive from the changes in social and sexual roles that have taken place in the period since World War II.
It would be a mistake to see changing gender roles in society as threatening only to the males who dominate that society. Such changes also threaten many women who have accepted a more traditional role and who see any change as a threat. This response is not new. When women first agitated for the vote at the beginning of this century, they were opposed by women's groups who wanted things to remain as they were. Many of these women were ladies of means and social position in society, and they argued that woman's suffrage placed an additional and unbearable burden on women, whose place was in the home. In Gilead, upper class women seem to have taken this idea even further and so have become more docile and subjugated themselves. Atwood is indicating the degree to which women in our society have been complicit in their own subjugation as they have often accepted a secondary role.
The book in particular takes a feminist point-of-view toward reproductive rights, something this future has distorted and taken away. This future claims that it has developed a society with a new way of treating women, but in fact, it is simply a society which has codified an attitude toward women that Atwood finds in the society of our time in a more covert way. This novel suggests that a twisted agreement has been reached between the religious right and the feminist anti-pornography activists of our time. Atwood expresses this in scenes of the indoctrination centers where Handmaids are trained, for there they are treated to lengthy lectures about the horrors of the old days which were supposedly filled with the filth of pornography, rape, and other ills. It is claimed that now everything is so much better because strict rules have been made against those things. What is apparent is that in making this bargain, women have freed themselves from certain fears while losing their freedom to have genuine self-directed lives. They have complained about the objectification of pornography, yet they have now made themselves into objects of a different sort, controlled from outside, with limited choices of their own. This is not a simple feminist tract about how women are abused, however, for Gilead is a society which treats both sexes -- and sex itself -- as an evil to be controlled.
Atwood's narrator, Offred, says of herself and others in her situation, "We yearned for the future" (Atwood 4). Her role is important in this novel because she remembers an earlier time when she had what we would consider a normal life with a husband and children, and now she serves a specific social role as breeder -- society has turned back to a classification of gender roles that is more rigid and divisive than exists today. Atwood warns that...
The massive mollusks still do seem fantastical. Several of the irrational elements of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea seemed more outrageous in the 19th century they do now. However, the novel continues to encapsulate the fantasy and science fiction genres because of its willingness to expand the boundary of what is real. Interestingly, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea did not stretch those boundaries much further than hard science has. On
SCIENCE FICTION & FEMINISM Sci-Fi & Feminism Origins & Evolution of Science Fiction As with most things including literature, science fiction has progressed and changed a lot over the years. Many works of science fiction were simply rough copies and following the altready-established patterns of prior authors. However, there has always been authors and creators that push the envelope and forge new questions and storylines that have not been realized or conceptualized before.
Science Fiction Novel: The Neuromancer, By William Gibson William Gibson's The Neuromancer is particularly important for the relationship it depicts between science and society. The novel, published in 1984, is prescient in the fact that it portrays a world in which the most powerful proponents of technology are not the governments, but rather corporate entities driven by conventional notions of greed and self-serving hegemony (which are the same impetuses for most
Science fiction novel: Philip K. Dick, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? The most interesting facet of Philip Dick's novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, is its depiction of humanity and several crucial tenets that help to define it. Within the novel, humanity is akin to empathy, since one of the primary distinctions between the people and androids in it is that the former are capable of and the latter
In Mattapoisett, gender and ethnicity are not issues, there are no gender roles, men and women share all the work, and men are actually about to suckle the young, while women work in the fields and fight wars. Because there are no gender roles, love is shared by anyone who respect each other, in other words no one classed as homosexual or heterosexual, there are no boundaries concerning love. Mattapoisett
His attraction to her is dictated by his own immortal loneliness and the fact that she has sufficient power to destroy him. The danger in her thus calls to the danger in himself. 2. Both Sam in Lord of Light and Doro in Wild Seed function optimally as lone characters as a result of their specific ideology and physiology, respectively. Sam, as part of a crew from a technologically advanced
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now