What Methods Can Schools in the United States Implement to Prevent Violence in Schools?
Introduction
Statement of the problem
The recent upswing in high-profile violent incidents in the United States has focused increasing attention on the causes of this public health threat and what types of response are most appropriate. The debate over the most appropriate responses to increased violence in American society has also extended to the nation’s schools. Although it has always been present to some extent, violence has become a major problem in the nation’s schools in recent years (Kelly, 2010; Killam & Roland, 2014). While the potential for enhanced awareness of the problem and improved reporting mechanisms may account for some of the reported increase in school violence in recent years (Blosnich & Bossarte, 2011), the research that follows will clearly show that any level of violence in the schools can be enormously harmful to students and staff alike (Robers & Kemp, 2012), making investigations of this problem timely, relevant and important for policymakers and educators today. This need directly relates to the purpose of the proposed study as discussed further below.
Purpose of the study
The purpose of the proposed study will be to explore the secondary literature and collect primary data concerning the causes of violence in the nation’s schools and what steps can be implemented to prevent it. This purpose is highly congruent with the guidance provided by Johnson, Burke and Gielen (2012) who note that the vast majority of schools in the United States (90%-plus) have already implemented school-based initiatives that are designed to prevent school violence. In addition, school-based violence prevention programs can also help reduce the incidence of violent behaviors such as bullying through coursework in empathy and character building (Gibbone & Manson, 2010).
Definitions
The following definitions of key terms will be used for the purposes of the study proposed herein.
Methods: This term will include both school- and community-based initiatives that are specifically designed to prevent school violence.
School violence: This term will generally include all forms of physical and emotional abuse, including teasing, bullying, stabbings, shootings, assaults, and fights involving students (King, 2014).
Violence: More specifically, the proposed study will use the definition of this term provided by the World Health Organization which states this is “the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting In injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation” (cited in Kelly, 2014, p. 42).
Research questions
The following research questions will be used to develop the information needed to confirm or refute the proposed study’s hypotheses which immediately follow.
What are the main causes of violence in the schools?
What methods have proven effective in preventing school violence?
Hypothesis
The following hypotheses will be used to guide the proposed study’s research into the causes of school violence and what steps can be implemented to prevent it:
H1: There is a statistically significant correlation between gang activity and the prevalence of violence in a school.
N1: There is no statistically significant correlation between gang activity and the prevalence of violence in a school.
H2: There is a statistically significant correlation between school violence and the racial makeup of a school’s student body.
N2: There is no statistically significant correlation between school violence and the racial makeup of a school’s...
For example, students who are victims of violence as well as those who witness violent acts in their schools can experience a wide range of adverse health care outcomes that can extend into adulthood (Grantham, 2013). Although there remains a lack of longitudinal studies that have managed to track the young victims of violence into adulthood, the research to date indicates that young people who experience or witness violent acts can suffer from (a) externalizing behaviors (e.g., conduct problems, aggression); (b) internalizing problems (e.g., fears, phobias, depression, somatic complaints); (c) a diminished sense of self-worth; (d) social and emotional adjustment difficulties; (e) difficulties maintaining positive relations with peers and adults; (f) decreased social competence; (g) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); (h) anxiety; (i) depression; (j) elevated anger levels; (k) increased delinquent behaviors; (l) increased violent behaviors; and (m) elevated potential for involvement in abuse relationships in the future (Smith & Eklund, 2015, p. 21).
Likewise, the short-term adverse effects of violence in the schools on teachers and educational staff include acute stress disorder (e.g., anxiety, dissociation, numbing, depersonalization, and dissociative amnesia) as well as long-term effects (e.g., PTSD, illness, divorce, burnout, and career change) (Brock, 2009, p. 16). In sum, the effects of school violence can be life-altering and despite being made a national priority, this problem not only remains unresolved, it appears to be worsening.
Literature Review
Data collection
The data for the preliminary literature review will be collected from university and public libraries, as well a reliable online academic research resources such as EBSCOHost and Questia. The data search was limited to peer-reviewed and scholarly texts that were published in the English language with a preference for those published within the last 5 years. The search terms used for the preliminary literature review included “school violence,” “bullying,” “school assaults,” “student on student assaults,” “assaults against teachers,” and so forth. The results of the preliminary literature review are presented below.
Data analyses and results
Although all young people differ in their specific needs, they all share a common need for a school environment that is conducive to learning (Brown & Meredith, 2014; Janson & King, 2006). Indeed, many young people already struggle with the rigors of the educational requirements and…