The provisions offered by the act would serve as models based on which standards for other non-profit organizations can be developed in the future. It will create a better understanding of the limitations placed on auditors and a deeper scrutiny of the financial and transaction statements presented by the auditors. While the business governance rules do help out universities to good extent in avoiding scandals, generalizing all sections would not help.
Surveys have been conducted to determine the extent to which the Sarbanes-Oxley act should be implemented in universities and colleges. One of the studies revealed that around half of the respondents think that incorporating certain sections of the act would be a good idea. A research carried out by the corporation PricewaterhouseCoopers' named "Taking the Right Patii" brought together the presidents and officers of different universities. They put forth their own ideas regarding the feasibility of having SOX control the governance, risk management issues and internal controls. The results of the study showed how institutions, regardless of having a public or private status, have an auditing department. They have a minimum of one representative who has financial expertise and have their roles listed down. These are used to select external auditors who would present yearly audit reports. Most public corporations already have officers who present reports about the internal control operations to the auditors. However in a situation that an internal control report is required right away, most institutions would be unprepared. The study also revealed how it is more likely for representatives of public institutions to confirm financial statements compared to those in private ones. The status of risk management is fairly strong with close to 50% of public institutions using risk management techniques as compared to around 30% private ones. Incorporating a more comprehensive risk management structure would be financially harder for most non-profit institutions. (Implications for Nonprofit, 2003)
There are several universities which have included the regulations presented by the act. Some of them include Drexel University, Eastern Michigan University, Purdue University, University of Louisville and DePaul University. Drexel can be considered as the first major university which modified their internal laws according to the best practices stated by the Sarbanes-Oxley act. They employed auditors to look into potential risks which could hamper their internal processing. It currently has a COSO-based yearly audit conducted by people trained to understand the current needs. The university of Louisville adhered to the recommendations put forth by NACUBO and applied some new policies on their working structure. Services offered by external auditors received consent from an internal audit committee before being put into action. The head of the team conduction the audits was changed every 7th year. A council to oversee the progress of the compliance was developed in order to maintain a standard (Goins and Giacomino, 2009).
The latest developments with Sarbanes-Oxley include the investigations conducted over the rules of the act. Recent research results declare that considering the benefits obtained, the expenses faced by corporations to keep up with the rules are proving to a lot more than expected. The senior officers of the PCAOB have a lot of control over operations of American companies in the public sector. They gather funds as a fee from these companies based on how strong their assets are. In addition to this, PCAOB places further charges are imposed to make sure that the 404 rule over bookkeeping controls is being complied with. The difficulty of these steps requires extensive investigations over the smallest of issues. . "A glimmer of hope lies in the fact that Sarbox, drafted in the political panic following the Enron and Worldcom accounting scandals, failed to include a "severability clause." Thus if PCAOB is struck down as unconstitutional, all of Sarbanes-Oxley could come crashing down with it."(Freeman, 2009). "There is evidence that many educational institutions are already voluntarily complying with SOX principles and NACUBO recommendations because they believe it will benefit them. Smith provides some evidence of attitudes of business officers toward implementation of SOX at universities and colleges, and NACUBO's survey documents the degree of implementation up to 2004." (Goins and Giacomino,2009).
According to a study conducted by the SEC in 2003, a medium sized company could have most of their internal control operations done at around $91k yearly. Studies in more recent years have revealed this number to rise pretty steeply, choking start-up companies. The latest results have shown the section 404...
The investors got intoxicated by fraud happened to them because of greedy people. Thousands of employees left as the stock market went to the peak but most of them left their jobs due to low pay as well. (Kerry Hannon, July 6, 2005) bill was passed by the President Bush after the corporate fraud nearly just after three weeks on April 25, 2002. It referred to the Senate Banking
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) was put into law in 2002 following the revelations that Enron (and Enron's accountancy Arthur Anderson), WorldCom, and other corporations were using blatantly corrupt practices in accounting and causing huge losses for stakeholders in those firms. Moreover, the U.S. Congress could not simply stand by and allow companies to use unethical and illegal practices to scam huge sums of money for corporate executives while stripping the IRAs
Sarbanes-Oxley Act The objective of this study is to read the guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and to: (1) Evaluate the effectiveness of regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act over minimizing the corporate fraud and protecting investors make one suggestion for improvement; (2) Given the oversight of the accounting profession by the PCAOB as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, assess the impact on auditing firms and the public accounting professions; (3)
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Evaluating the effectiveness of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act The Public Company Accounting Reform (PCAR) and Investor Protection Act (IPA) was established in mid-2002 by the congress with the emergence of unceremonious scandals in accounting practice that resulted in firms going bankrupt and losing huge stocks in the stock market (Prentice & Bredeson, 2010). This act is what is referred to as Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. The act also led to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The accounting profession was entangled in the accounting and business scandals whirlwind that rocked the American economy in 2002. To recover investor confidence in financial data, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act designed a new Oversight Board for public Company accounting with the power to set requirements for auditors of public organizations, thus bringing to an end a century of export control of audit. We determine that this reform results
Literature on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The field of specialized literary reviews on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a widely spread one presenting numerous issues form various standpoints. Reviewers' opinions vary based on their position towards the bill and their prior professional expertise on white-collar crimes. Among the mostly appreciated and close to reality works are: The Impact of Regulatory Information Disclosure on Information Security Investments, Competition and Social Welfare by
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now