¶ … O'Connor
Conference votes are not chiseled in marble; they are subject to change after the justices read their colleagues' draft opinions. And read them they do, thoroughly and carefully. They write thoughtful (in both senses of the word) memos about these opinions. All this, of course, confirms what earlier studies have reported.
What Courts, Judges, and Politics makes clear is that changes in outcome between conference vote and final decision are far from unusual. Equally impressive are the justices' conscientious (though not always successful) efforts to reach decisions by consensus rather than simple majority.
Though they are too few to prove, in a variety of cases, some justices have more collegial impact than others; Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy are frequent players, for instance, while Antonin Scalia is not.
But the most striking pattern is the absence of pattern; collegial consultation does not consistently move the Court to the right, to the center, or toward either activism or restraint.
Hodgson v. Minnesota (1990) upheld a parental-notification-with-judicial-bypass restriction on minors' abortion rights. However, its invalidation of a two-parent notification rule, containing "O'Connor's first vote to strike down an abortion restriction, has proved the Thermidor for the would-be Rehnquist 'revolution' (to use the term in Justice Blackmun's draft Webster dissent) in abortion law."
Collegial deliberation in criminal procedure cases has also checked the reformist impulse, temporarily at least. Missouri v. Blair (1987), for example, transmogrified from an "important Fourth Amendment case" into "not even a footnote in recent Supreme Court jurisprudence." A two-step process turned a five to four conference vote to allow police to use strategic arrests for minor offenses to investigate major crimes into a "DIG" (dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.) Lewis Powell's draft dissent convinced O'Connor to change her vote; the new majority to uphold the lower court yielded…
Sandra O'Connor Sandra Day was born on March 26, 1930 in El Paso, Texas to Harry and Ada Mae, owners of the Lazy-B-Cattle ranch in Southeastern Arizona, where Sandra grew up (United States Supreme Court 2003) as an only child until she was eight. In those early years, her family lived in isolation and with strained resources. The ranch did not have electricity and running water until she was seven years
" Her close attention to statutory detail (she once offered an amendment to a bill in order to insert an important missing comma) and complete mastery of facts is especially notable in light of her future judicial methodology. Anxious to return to law in 1974, O'Connor won a seat as a trial judge on the Maricopa Superior Court....In 1980 Babbit, who had been elected governor, appointed O'Connor to the Arizona
" Then there are the "...5 million employees of the federal bureaucracy and the military" at his disposal. Also, the president runs the executive branch of government; Cummings writes that he is "chief of state" - the "ceremonial and symbolic head of state as well as head of government" (391) - as well as being "chief executive" of the government. He has the power to "grant reprieves and pardons for offenses
He learned quickly, showed political prowess, was not afraid to lead his followers in troubled times (like the Screen Actors' strike), and he could think on his feet, develop his own very moving speeches, and he had very strong beliefs which he was not afraid to voice. All of these are qualities of a leader, and they developed as he made his way thorough life. Reagan, with support of some
School Finance Aguilar v Felton EDUCATION AND RELIGION The Aguilar et al. v Felton et al. Case of 1985 Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 allowed for the reimbursement of the salaries of public employees teaching in parochial schools (LII, 2012). These selected teachers provided instruction to low-income children with special needs. A group of taxpayers filed a case, claiming that the program created an excessive entanglement of
" (Potter, 1999) Supreme Court finally strikes down juvenile executions On Mar. 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down once and for all juvenile executions in the United States, abandoning nations such as Nigeria, Congo, China, Pakistan and others whose records of human rights abuse are staggering. The 5-4 decision reverses the death sentences of about 70 juvenile murderers and bars states from seeking to execute minors for future crimes. The executions, the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now