Salman Rushdie is one of the most famous authors of the modern era. In the tradition of Gabriel Marquez, Rushdie sweeps the reader up in his novel, Midnights Children, like the book by Marquez that obviously had a great deal of influence on Rushdie, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Midnights Children is a postmodern look at the modern fairytale that Salman Rushdie weaves for those who wish to pick up the book.
This paper will include a brief description of postmodernism followed by a look at Salman Rushdie. Most scholars agree that this novel fits into the category of Postmodernist fiction, but how so? What specific elements of postmodernism do this book contain that makes it a postmodern book? In this paper, I will look at various elements of postmodernism including the contrast of information and knowledge, the idea that the novel parallels history, decolonization, feminism/post feminism, dispersion philosophy, ontology, and the role of chance, and the idea of fantasy in Salman Rushdie's novel.
Postmodernism is a word that critics and the general population like to throw around whether they understand what the word means or not. Postmodernism emerged in academic literature during the mid-1980's. Postmodernism is hard to define because it appears in a wide variety of areas, like art, architecture, music, film, literature, sociology, communications, fashion, and technology. Furthermore, postmodernism cannot be described as a temporal phenomenon, it is hard to put a date on postmodernism, like one might date the baroque period.
In order tom understand postmodernism in literature, it might be helpful to look at the movement from which postmodernism grew, that is, modernism. The main characteristics of a modern literature are:
An emphasis on impressionism and subjectivity in writing, an emphasis on how perception takes place rather than what is perceived, such as stream-of conscious writing.
Movement away from objectivity provided by omniscient third person narrators and clear-cut moral positions.
Blurring the distinction between genres. Poetry is more like documentary and prose is more poetic.
An emphasis on fragmented forms, discontinuous narratives and random-seeming collages of different materials.
A tendency toward reflexivity, or self-consciousness.
Rejection of formal aesthetics.
Rejection of the high/low distinction in popular culture.
Postmodernism follows most of these same ideas. But there are important differences.
Modernism presents a fragmented view of human subjectivity and history.
Modernism presents that fragmentation as tragic. On the other hand, postmodernism does not present the idea of fragmentation as something that is tragic, but celebrates the fragmented nature of existence. In other words, Postmodernism is more lighthearted than modernism, tends not to take itself as seriously as modernism does.
According to Frederic Jameson, modernism and postmodernism are cultural formations, which accompany particular stages of capitalism. Jameson outlines three primary phases of capitalism that dictate particular cultural practices, including the kind of art and literature that are produced. The first is market capitalism. This is the type of capitalism that prevailed in Western Europe, England, and the United States, and all their colonies, in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The first phase is associated with a particular kind of aesthetic, which we now call realism. The second phase occurred in from the late nineteenth century until the mid twentieth century, ending about World War II. This second phase is referred to as the era of monopoly capitalism and is associated with electric and internal combustion motors, and with the period referred to as modernism. Now, we are in the third stage, multinational/consumer capitalism. The emphasis now is on marketing, selling, and consuming, not on production. This era is associated with nuclear and electronic technologies, and is correlated in time to postmodernism.
Jameson's characterization of postmodernism in terms of production, economic models and technology is more closely associated with history and sociology than it is with literature or the arts. Jameson defines postmodernism in terms of an entire era of civilization, much more aligned with a definition like "the bronze age," than the baroque.
So what are we supposed to think of Midnight's Children in terms of a postmodern framework? It would be helpful to know a little about the author in order to answer such questions as, how did an Indian writer come to be associated with a movement that is so closely linked to the Western World, like Australia, Canada, the United States, Western Europe and...
Salman Rushdie: Contemporary Socrates of the 'Global Village' When the Anglo-Indian writer Salman Rushdie's controversial novel The Satanic Verses was first published in 1989, the book ignited an international firestorm, replete with book burnings, massive public protests, and even the issuance of a fatwa, or a religious death sentence against Rushdie by Iran's hard-line religious leader, then-Ayatollah Khomeini. Since then, sixteen years have past, Rushdie is still alive, and writing. Since
Meanwhile, the family became so poor that Grandmother had to sell the porcelain dishes, the silverware, and the linen napkins. But she kept out one set for him to eat from, because an aristocrat couldn't eat from ordinary dishes. One Saturday night he got an idea for an invention. The children took their baths on Saturday night in a washtub in the kitchen. By the last child, the water
In the story, he claims that a big title wave hinder him from doing what he wanted to do. However, when he accomplished his goal, he claimed the title wave was not there at all. The reader could take as the water/title wave to be a metaphor to represent the obstacles he had to go through in order to become a good storyteller again. Part fantasy, part allegory and always clever
Respect and the Thought Police'": Illustrating Socrates' "Gadfly Analogy" from Plato's Apology Webster's New American Dictionary defines "gadfly" as "a person who annoys, esp. By persistent criticism" (p. 213). By that definition, Socrates' critics certainly would have considered him one. (It is easier to decide someone is a mere "gadfly," rather than an astute social critic, or a rare perceiver of truth should one feel offended by the "gadfly." )
But Rushdie's relationship with English as a writer, even as a critic of the former British Empire, is far more complex. In Salman Rushdie's text "English is an Indian literary language," Rushdie states that the output of literature in English by Indian writers is more interesting and vital than those produced in India's native languages. Through creativity and dialogue with the oppressor, a great literature has been generated. India's
There is the feeling that Rushdie is toying with the concept of freedom of speech in this story as well as destroying the concept of the East as mysterious. Rushdie uses English to tell his story, but he incorporates the Indian oral tradition without any kind of chronological structure to the story. He deconstruct the binary opposition of East and West. He himself is between the Orient and the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now