rule of Peter the Great was characterized with Western orientation in all areas of Russian life, establishment of Russia as a military might and development of sciences and education imported again from the West. This paper discusses the causes behind the success of transformation of Russia during the reign of Peter, the Great.
PETER THE GREAT AND HIS EFFECTS ON RUSSIAN MODERNIZATION AND WESTERNIZATION
The groundwork for the Golden Age that Russia experienced between mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth century was laid down by Peter the Great who founded and established the paradigms required for Russia's supremacy. Peter the Great, the most influential czar and military leader in Russian history, literally transformed his country from an almost medieval backwater region into one of the world's great powers at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Russia had missed out on both the Renaissance and the Reformation, which left it nearly a century behind the rest of Europe in every field imaginable: social, cultural, political and educational. However, due to Peter's keen observations and the effective plans of action that thus evolved, Russia emerged, almost overnight, as a mighty empire comparable with the likes of Britain, France and Germany. This rapid change in Russia's status was thus, wholly dependant upon the revolutionary ways of Peter the Great that he employed to rule over Russia.
This paper provides a lucid account of Peter's achievements in impacting Russian society, government and education thereby giving Russia the very life that it needed to survive and flourish. In addition, the paper also provides adequate rationale or causes behind Peter's success in transforming Russia within the context of the prevalent conditions at the eve of Peter's ascension, his childhood education and environment and finally his foreign and domestic achievements.
CAUSES OF SUCCESS
Background
Peter I, was born to Alexis Romanov and his second wife Natalia Naryshkina in 1672. Peter was the youngest of Czar's children. From Alexis' first marriage (with Maria Miloslavsky) were born Feodor III, Sophia Alekseyevna, and the semi-imbecile Ivan. Czar Alexis' early death at the age of thirty-one left a bitter struggle for power between the family of Alexis's first wife's family, the Miloslavskaias, and Peter's family. However, a brief period of reign by Peter's half brother Feodor (1676-1682) followed. On Feodor III's death (1682), a struggle broke out again for the succession between the Naryshkina and Miloslavsky factions. The Naryshkinas at first succeeded in setting Ivan aside in favor of 10-year-old Peter. Shortly afterward, however, the Miloslavsky party incited the Streltsi (semi-military formations in Moscow) to rebellion. As a result of the rebellion Ivan, as Ivan V, was made (1682) joint czar with Peter, under the regency of Sophia Alekseyevna, his half sister Sofia who assumed control of Russia as regent from 1682-1689. During this time Peter and his half brother, Ivan V, waited as co-Czars until they came of age.
In 1689, Sophia Alekseyevna attempted a coup d'etat against Peter; this time, however, aided by the loyal part of the Streltsi, he overthrew the regent. In addition, Sophia was exiled to a convent. For several years, until Peter assumed personal rule, the Naryshkinas ran the government. Ivan V, whose death in 1696 left Peter sole czar, took no part in the government (Massie, 1996). When Czar Ivan died in 1896, Peter remained monarch.
Even at the tender age of ten, Peter was no stranger to adversary. The death of his father and the consequent struggle for throne was the determining factor in the composition of his personality. In addition, a life amidst two warring factions, unexpected shift of friends to foes and deaths of loved ones left a lasting impression on young Peter's mind. All these factors combined to provoke Peter's survival instincts, his lack of blind trust in those around him and near and the skill to anticipate the needs of the future. Since these qualities are characteristics of a leader, it may be safely deduced that a substantial part of Peter's destiny as an effective Russian leader was established through his early life experiences during the years of power struggle that followed his father's death.
In the years between Feodor's death and Peter's ascension to power, ill-favored Natalia was exiled to the countryside along with Peter. Therefore instead of the usual staid upbringing within the Kremlin walls, Peter experienced most of his childhood and the formative years in a suburb of Moscow, surrounded by playmates drawn both from the nobility and from the roughest social elements. It was here that Peter fostered his love of warfare, and had his first contact with...
Catherine the Great vs. Elizabeth I Elizabeth I of England and Catherine II or Catherine the Great of Russia were both of noble birth. Elizabeth was the only surviving child of Henry VIII and his second queen, Anne Boleyn (911 Encyclopedia 2004). She was born on September 7, 1533 at Greenwich Palace almost 200 years before the birth of Catherine the Great of Russia. Elizabeth's death was met with much frustration
Absurdity of Life in Modernist Drama Although not prolific, the contemporary American playwright Peter Morris demonstrates very readily the way in which the absurdist strain in modernist drama has carried through into the early twenty-first century. What is most interesting about Morris's work in this light is the way that earlier theatrical movements -- most particularly the theater of the absurd -- are being incorporated and effectively used as one rhetorical
Monica was honored for her forbearance in marriage to an undisciplined, often cruel pagan man. Augustine's father suffers by comparison to Augustine's mother, but rather than suggest that she should have left his father because of his mistreatment, Monica's quiet example of patient endurance is praised by her son. Augustine's turning towards his mother was seen, through hindsight, as the major development of his life, but he went through several
However, although Machiavelli held firm in his belief that the Church should not have the same governing functions as the State, he provided the example of Pope Julius in demonstrating how, if a religious leader holds firm to his beliefs and manner of disciplining his clergy, he can establish a strong clergy and can yield influence and power over the State and civil society. In describing Pope Julius's leadership style,
Pharmaceutical industries have to operate in an environment that is highly competitive and subject to a wide variety of internal and external constraints. In recent times, there has been an increasing trend to reduce the cost of operation while competing with other companies that manufacture products that treat similar afflictions and ailments. The complexities in drug research and development and regulations have created an industry that is subject to intense
" It caused missionaries to deal with peoples of other cultures and even Christian traditions -- including the Orthodox -- as inferior. God's mission was understood to have depended upon human efforts, and this is why we came to hold unrealistic universalistic assumptions. Christians became so optimistic that they believed to be able to correct all the ills of the world." (Vassiliadis, 2010) Missiology has been undergoing changes in recent years
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now