Rise of the Secular Turkish Republic
It was in 1923 that the Republic of Turkey appeared on the face of the globe. The Turks consider the preceding years i.e. 1919-1922 as the years of their struggle for independence. The Turkish state that was formed as a consequence of this struggle was a completely new republic despite the fact that various partition schemes were proposed by the triumphant Allies during and after The Great War I (Alaranta 115). This paper will discuss the rise of the Secular Turkish Republic. It will elaborate the state of the empire when Sultan Abdul Hamid II came into power. It will also tackle the actions taken under his leadership to restrain European authority and involvement which eventually led to Sultan's demise. However, the rise of the secular Turkish Republic is mainly due to the countless efforts of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Therefore, this paper would extensively discuss the construction of Turkish history and identity in the years during the establishment of Ataturk's republic.
Sultan Abdul Hamid II: Leadership
Sultan Abdul Hamid II, the son of Sultan Abdul Majid and the thirty-fourth Sultan of the Ottoman Empire inherited a penniless and ruined empire. The Ottoman debt increased progressively with the beginning of the Crimean War (1853-1856). As the ruler of the empire, Sultan was weighed down with challenges of maintaining a large standing army and renovating it in the face of continuous threats from the foreign powers. Thus, the need of the time was to borrow continuously. The intense burden of debt affected all the aspects of the Sultan's period of influence. Not only did the debt burden cast a long shadow on the international relations and political reorganization but also impacted the educational and agricultural facets of the empire (Ahmed).
The weakened condition of the military and economy of the Ottoman Empire made it a prospected prey of the European imperial ambitions. During this period of history, Russia, France, Italy and Great Britain in particular, were all set to conquer the weak and unstable states. The nineteenth century Europe demonstrated an assortment of nationalists. At the same time, it was the Ottoman Empire only that supported to maintain a multi-religious, multi-ethnic and multi-national state. Unluckily, the fractures in the weakened empire were all too plain as the nose on one's face. These fissures were a tempting invitation for the foreign powers to meddle and interfere in the affairs of the empire. The European powers were firm to gobble up the bankrupt Ottoman Empire. They wanted to use the religious and racial divisions as political opportunities to conquer the Turkish homeland. The broke Ottoman state was not strong enough to support and protect and was persistently trying to find allies who would assure the empire's territorial integrity. This situation left two choices for Sultan Abdul Hamid II; either wage a gallant struggle to release the empire or rescue its central Islamic components in case he would have to lose the Christian provinces. Following this quest, he chose diplomacy instead of war. He wanted to challenge the purposes of one European power against the other European power. However, he negotiated where required and sometimes also bought time to restructure and improve the institutions holding the empire as one. The Sultan was successful to a great extent. However, his high-handed, oppressive and tyrannical manner of dictating won him the disapproval of his subjects. His successful reforms turned out to be so powerful that the forces behind then eventually curbed his power and directed the empire to its downfall (Ahmed).
The supreme mark of respect for Sultan Abdul Hamid II lies in the fact that still in the present day, a lot of Muslims around the world call up his name with reminiscence for a long-gone period. They remember and long for the time when the acclaimed Sultan provided full focus for the Islamic community worldwide and presented it the wisdom of universal brotherhood. During his reign, even the Muslims as distant as India and Nigeria were dependent on him for supervision and leadership. His office branched out to help the Muslims religiously, politically, culturally and socially; not only to those residing in Turkey but all around the world. The Ottoman fez turned out to be not just a cap for the Turkish people but for the whole Islamic world. Regrettably, he collapsed due to his pursuing of the modernization program through an exceedingly innermost, personal approach. This mannerism made people disappointed in him who charged him of authoritarianism and repression. As already...
Kemal Ataturk Kemal Ataturk, founder of modern Turkey and its first elected president, was born as Mustafa on March 12, 1881 in Salonika or Thessaloniki, in Greece which was then under the Ottoman Empire. His father, Ali Reza Efendi, was a customs official who wanted his son's education to take place in a secular school. However, his father died while he was still a child. It was his mother Zubeyde Hanim
It was reflected in the Republic's closure of religious convents in 1925. (Fleet, Faroqhi, & Kasaba, p. 164). The Republic also replaced the Islamic canon law with a secular civil code in 1926. (Fleet, Faroqhi, & Kasaba, p. 164-165). Thus, Yaban's portrayal of the gullible peasant populace and their attachment to Islam, illustrates the social obstacles that the Nationalist government was reacting to with its secularizing reforms. Conclusion Karaomerlio-lu's views might
" The Constitution allows rites of worship and religious services and ceremonies. It protects people from being compelled to worship and participate in these religious rites against their will. It forbids the exploitative use of religion, religious feelings or things held sacred for personal or political influence. It insures that one can change his religion or belief by himself or as a group, privately or publicly. The Constitution has these
Iran and Iraq Analysis of the Impact of Imperialism on Iran and Iraq The modern nation of Iraq was formed in 1932 when the Kingdom of Iraq gained independence from the United Kingdom. It had been placed under the authority of Great Britain as the British Mandate of Mesopotamia by the League of Nations in 1920. Prior to that, it was part of the Ottoman Empire. This delineates the history of imperialism
high degree of misinformation I had received from traditional teachings about the church and the beginning of Christianity. Moreover, I was struck by the notion that most other people in the Western world receive this same degree of intentional misinformation, so much so that I have even heard people defend the idea that knowledge of the historical church is irrelevant to modern Christianity. Reading through the class material, I
The Church although took a reactionary approach to the change, there was no benefit of such approach. People felt more farther from the religious authority than before. The Church labeled the new secular system as the pursuit of wanton passions and indulgence in sins by the masses. The labeling took systematic shape when Pope and regional priests tried to lure vast segments of society by declaring the new secular
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now