¶ … English military to the year 1688. In order to undertsand the history of the English military, we must first examine the history opf England itself. The military has always been beholden to political and cultural factors and several developments in technology have changed the face of warfare and, by extension, the development of the military.
In the year 1688, King James II was forcibly removed from power and replaced by William of Orange. James II was a Catholic, and determined to reinstate Catholicism in England. After the birth of James' son and heir, a party of elder statesmen officially invited William of Orange, a Protestant, to come to England with a conquering army to save the kingdom from the Catholic rule of James II. This was known as the Glorious Revolution.
Before England
Before we can examine the history of the English military, we must examine the roots of England itself. Up until the ninth century, there was no central England per se. England was divided into several smaller kingdoms, each alternately warring and trading with its neighbors. There was no sense of English identity at this point in history, as there were divers peoples scattered about the island. Archaeologists have found substantial evidence that humans occupied England as far back as the Stone Age. Almost nothing is known about these early Britons, as there was no written tradition among them.
The earliest known inhabitants of the British Isles are the Celts. The Celts were a tribal people that had originated somewhere in Germany somewhere around 800 BC. They migrated westward throughout Europe, eventually crossing what would later be known as the English Channel to settle in England. They pushed aside the original inhabitants, eventually spreading throughout Scotland, Wales and Ireland as well.
The Celts had a strong warrior heritage. Their chiefs were traditionally warriors. The Celts had no unified identity. Each tribe settled its own lands and chose a king from its own ranks. The tribes would wage war as well as trade with one another. They were an iron-age people with fairly sophisticated metalworking skills. They wore little in the way of armor and their weaponry consisted mostly of knives, swords and spears. They also had developed the war chariot to a high degree.
The Romans first arrived in Britain in 55 BC, but didn't stay for long. The original expeditions launched by Julius Caesar were not intended to conquer the Isles, bnut instead were meant to dissuade support for the Celtic tribes in Gaul who had been receiving help from the British Celts. Almost one hundred years later, the Romans returned to occupy Britain for the long-term. The Celts fought fiercely against Roman occupation but in the end were outclassed by Roman military tactics. While the Celts were formidable warriors, they lacked the technology and cohesiveness to battle the Roman legions. The Romans had better body armor than the Celts. In addition, the Romans has superior missile power than the Celts in the form of the pilum, or javelin. The Celtic hillforts were also susceptible to siege tactics. English chariots were vulnerable to Roman archers. The Romans had the resources of a standing army and its supply lines and administration, as opposed to the Celtic warrior-farmers who had crops to tend to in addition to fighting a war. The Celts were also vulnerable to devastation at the hands of the Romans as their crops were razed and burned. Most of all, the Celts had no capacity to band together to fight the Romans. The Roman conquest was only made easier by the fact that they would fight individual tribes instead of a singular great army. Despite their numerous advantages, however, Rome never successfully conquered the entire island but ruled the south for the better part of four centuries.
The Romans ended their occupation early in the fifth century. Rome pulled...
History Naval Warfare What was naval power in the age of sail and how did different sea going states exercise it from the period 1650-1850? "There is a deep landlubber bias in historical and social research," writes Charles King. "History and social life, we seem to think, happen on the ground. What happens on the water…is just the scene-setter for the real action when the actors get where they are going. But
" (Rise of the Commons) The 14th century was a time when the aristocracy (the Commons in particular) acted on account of their personal interests in addition to acting in accordance with the King's wishes. These individuals gradually started to consider that it was only natural for them to have a word in governing the country and that it was irrational for them to simply accept the King's decisions with regard
The process would take centuries, but by Elizabethan times it had surely begun. Serfdom had all but disappeared from England, and money rents and wages had largely replaced other forms of compensation and exchange. The new importance of trade contributed to a profound change in attitudes, one that was beginning to re-shape society itself. In 1579, Thomas Churchyard defined as nobles, "Merchauntes that sail forrain countreys," a statement that
A favorite target for conspiracists today as well as in the past, a group of European intellectuals created the Order of the Illuminati in May 1776, in Bavaria, Germany, under the leadership of Adam Weishaupt (Atkins, 2002). In this regard, Stewart (2002) reports that, "The 'great' conspiracy organized in the last half of the eighteenth century through the efforts of a number of secret societies that were striving for
Revolution Christopher Hill's The Century of Revolution 1603-1714 details the transformations in English economic, political, ideological, and religious life. The author states in his introductory chapter, "The years between 1603 and 1714 were perhaps the most decisive in English history" because those years signified the dawn of the modern age and the rise of the English empire (13). Hill divides the various changes in English society, which would come to
ECB can be successful at emulating the strategic model set forth by the German Bundesbank. The discussion will focus on the fact that the ECB is facing different problems as it is still in the developmental phases. The investigation will seek to determine whether the tools of the Bundesbank can provide support for the ECB in achieving economic stability in the European Monetary Union. Research about this particular topic is
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now