The primary evidence Foucault uses to justify his comments about human society is how sexuality was viewed in classical times compared to how it is viewed today. He says that governments now regulate sexuality because they have to ensure the longevity and health of their population. Because society now values life more than it did in the past, power is more widespread across the population because of wider sovereignty. Foucault's evidence for this point is not always direct, maybe because his research methods are also not always direct. He says that racism and Nazism are proof that biopolitics now exist. "Nazism was doubtless the most cunning and the most naive (and the former because of the latter) combination of the fantasies of blood and the paraoxysms of a disciplinary power" (Foucault 271). It seems that Foucault's thesis about biopolitics is supported with evidence that could be both a cause and an effect of biopolitics, so it is difficult to always know if he is using it as an example of biopower or a cause of it, which can make questioning his argument difficult. Still, his evidence on the whole seems to be very strong, and his interpretation of it is very persuasive.
Overall, Michel Foucault's "Right of Death...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now