¶ … revocable and an irrevocable trust? The difference between a revocable and an irrevocable trust is very simple. A revocable trust is one that has been created and that can be revoked at a future time - generally for specific reasons (CompTax, n.d.). These kinds of trusts can also be changed, so if a person does not want to completely revoke the trust but wants to make adjustments, that is possible (CompTax, n.d.). Often these kinds of trusts are made when it comes to wills and estate planning, but they can also be used in order to focus on business transactions and the individuals who are allowed to initiate or complete those transactions. An irrevocable trust, as the name implies, is one that cannot be revoked. Once it has been created it is not able to be changed, which means that anyone who creates it must be very careful about doing so (CompTax, n.d.). Irrevocable trusts are not as common, because changes cannot be made to them at a later date. What is done with this type of trust, and that requires careful consideration for estate planning and in the business world, as well. While it is possible for a person to make an irrevocable trust without regrets, it is better to keep the trust revocable in case circumstances change in the future.
2) Write on what distinguishes the following cases from one another: Jiminez v. Lee, Unthank v. Sippstein, Clark v. Campbell, Hieble v. Hieble. There are several distinctions between the cases addressed here, all of which are designed to address and uphold trusts. In Jimenez v. Lee, the court ruled in favor of a daughter who claimed her father misused the funds in her trust. The ruling was made because there are very few words needed to actually create a trust, and the creation of such is more about intent, which was clearly demonstrated (CompTax, n.d.). Unthank v. Sippstein and Clark v. Campbell were both similar cases in that the court determined there was no trust. In the first case that was due to the lack of actual intent to create a trust, and in the second case that was due to the lack of clarity regarding to whom the property should be given (CompTax, n.d.). Hieble v. Hieble was unique in that there was no written agreement (CompTax, n.d.). The law generally says that all trusts must be in writing, but an exception was made in this particular case because of the clarity and the intent that took place between the adult children and the mother who wanted the property back (CompTax, n.d.). All of the cases dealt with trusts, but they were also different in the way they handled those trusts and how the trusts were seen to be created.
3) What are capital gains? Capital gains, in their simplest form, are properties that are held for the purpose of investment (CompTax, n.d.). This property is held by a taxpayer, and does not need to be connected to his or her business dealings to be considered for capital gain (CompTax, n.d.). The property can be personal in nature, such as a landlord who is renting something out, as opposed to being professional in nature, such as a business that is renting or leasing space or equipment (CompTax, n.d.). Some stocks, certain types of property, copyrights, and a few other items are not acceptable to be used for capital gains (CompTax, n.d.). In order for something to be acceptable for capital gains it must not be on the list of items that do not qualify, and it must also be actual capital. In other words, it must be something tangible that a person or business can use, and it must be able to be used in order to gain income. Sometimes people who are utilizing capital in this way end up losing money, but naturally that is not the intention. The desire is to see a monetary gain for the use of the capital.
4) What is the difference between long-term and short-term capital gains? Long-term capital gains are those that are intended to continue for some time, or that are not intended to see results right away (CompTax, n.d.). Both of these options can be considered long-term gains, but one is more desirable than the other. It is much better to start seeing gains immediately and keep seeing those gains for a very long time, as opposed to not seeing any gains immediately and begin required to wait a long time before the gains start to...
Trusts and Taxes "Gift Transfers and Gift Tax Planning" An irrevocable trust could be used as a way to name beneficiaries and avoid estate taxes. Unlike a revocable trust, irrevocable trusts do not have to pay taxes. In this case, any assets that are placed in the irrevocable trust are no longer deemed to be assets of the settler; instead they are deemed assets of the trustee. The difference is that in
So your wife can renounce the business given to her and then pass it without gift tax to the children. Disclaimers must be made within 9 months of the death of the first decedent if they are to avoid gift tax. An appropriate disclaimer may also be a very effective tool to assist in a poorly written estate plan. 7. JOINTLY HELD PROPERTY: The joint tenancy form of ownership could result
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now