The drive towards greater homogenization of international standards has lead the United States FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) to consider the IASB's call for a shift to cash flow methods for all organizations. The justification for this is that accruals are more subject to dishonest practices "since every accrual requires certain assumptions and estimates… when a firm completes a sale on credit, it must estimate the likelihood that the cash will be received, when the receipt will take place, and if full payment is uncertain, how much should be reflected on the income statement. None of these issues arise when the sale is for cash" and a firm cannot use assumptions and estimates to inflate profits ("Will global accounting rules help or hinder accuracy," Knowledge @ Emory, 2007). However, cash flow accounting is not without its critics. Because "accrual account recognizes revenue and expenses in the period they occur, regardless of whether cash changes hands" it may be a better long-term picture of the state of the firm ("Will global accounting rules help or hinder accuracy," Knowledge @ Emory, 2007). Cash flow accounting can more easily be subject to shifts in the flow of receipts and payments, and a firm can choose to 'pack' its cash transactions into a particular period of time when it needs to maximize its impression of profitability. "If managers wish to distort results, they can boost cash inflows by simply delaying the purchase of supplies, or of interest-bearing, short-term securities, and can also delay paying whom they owe" ("Will global accounting rules help or...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now