Diplomacy without Diplomats
Introduction
George Kennan was an American diplomat who spent years in the Foreign Service and served as Ambassador to the Soviet Union and to Yugoslavia. In Diplomacy without Diplomats, he focuses on the important need of a Foreign Service that is operated by the State Department with the sole aim of using diplomacy to cultivate relationships with foreign nations. He laments the fact that the State Department has been undercut by the rise of various special interest groups and congressional committees that now outnumber officials from the State Department in ambassadorial premises of the US in foreign capitals.
Structure
The essay is structured in the following manner: it begins with an introduction of the topicthe Foreign Service and the standards that were laid out by its founders. It gives a brief history of Americas diplomatic and consular services, their merger under the Rogers Act, and an explanation for why the Foreign Service has failed to live up to the standards envisioned for it. Kennan describes how, one by one, each of the standards that was meant to guide the Foreign Service was ignored or abused, beginning with the standard that one enter the Service only at the bottom and by examination (Kennan, p. 201). Kennans thesis throughout the essay is the Foreign Service is an important mechanism by which diplomacy is achievedbut in todays environment there are too many bureaucrats and special interest group representatives acting on behalf of the US without deference to the State Department, which used to be tasked with shaping foreign policy. What this means is that foreign policy in the US is shaped more by congressional committees and special interests than by the diplomats. Moreover, Kennan concludes his essay by saying that not only has diplomacy changed in the US but the whole world has changed, and the manner in which nations communicate has changed, thanks to the arrival of new advances in technology. Kennan leaves the reader in somewhat of a haze at the end, suggesting that no one knows what the future will bring.
Main Argument
Kennans central argument...
As Kennan notes, many international questions today are addressed in multilateral forums of one sort or another. To such multilateral deliberations the president or his entourage often sends representatives, persons without a diplomatic background and not always reporting to, or through, the State Department. It is at such gatherings, it will be argued, that the United States now has most of its dealings with any particular government, rather than through the resident ambassador in that country (p. 207). This has led to a fragmentation of orientation. There is no diplomatic center, cohesion, wholeness or continuity. An envoy at a forum is unlikely to understand or be able to explain the full extent of the nature and motivations of the government: he has only a tiny bit of information to go on. He does not carry within his person the full weight and responsibility of an American diplomat; he is more like a mere cog, passing on a message but doing nothing in the way of actual engagement. A diplomat on the other hand would be skilled and trained in the art of engagement; he would be able to discuss the nature and motivations of his government because he would have an intimate knowledge of them; he would not be a mere representative at a forum but rather he would be there to talk on behalf of the US. Today, that honor is lost.Strengths and Weaknesses
The strength of the essay is that Kennan is writing from the background of experience. He worked for the Foreign Service during and after World War 2 at a time when diplomacy was of the utmost importance for the US. He saw how essential forming and developing relationships with other nations was at a time when much of the world was or had been at war. He played an instrumental role for the US in addressing the challenges that America faced with the Soviet Union during the time of the Cold War, when diplomacy was vital to preventing nuclear war.
All of Kennans claims and arguments…
Diplomacy NK Diplomatic Relations with North Korea North Korea has a centralized government under the rigid control of the communist Korean Workers' Party (KWP), to which all government officials belong (U.S. Department of State, 2012). There are a couple other parties that are in existence in North Korea, however these parties have virtually no power or membership. Given the tight reign of control the government keeps on its population, much of the
Kissinger's Diplomacy can be treated as a treatise on international relations at large for the bulk of the book: the remaining quarter of the book can be summarized as a justification for the choices he made during the years of the Nixon administration. One can view Kissinger's Diplomacy as a form of support of realism within the realm of international politics. The chapters of the book that were examined through this
Summer Program Would Help Them in Their Career Globalization is certainly one of the most pressing topics in the contemporary society. This concept is especially visible as we come across it on a daily basis and as we realize that it would be impossible for us to stop it (not that we would want to). Interacting with individuals from different cultural environments can be very refreshing as long as someone
21st Century, What is Diplomacy? Gone are the days when the only means of resolving conflicts between countries were long blood smeared wars with no talks about finding a peaceful way out. As the world grows into a compact village where every country is dependent on the other for its sustenance, resolving conflicting interests, reconciling ructions and pursuing peaceful relations, knowing Diplomacy at its best is of sheer importance and irrevocable:
Pletcher puts forth the point that many wished to overtake Texas, for example, from Mexican control because of a certain level of hatred on the part of Americans for their neighbors south of the border. Perhaps, as well, there was a certain level of jealousy on the part of Americans for the extensive culture, lifestyle and tradition of the Mexican people, something which was not existent in any major
Track II diplomacy takes over when Track I fails. A third great revolution has been described as enveloping the world in modern times (Wriston 1997) and the catalyst has been technological change. Technology, or telecommunications, has astoundingly affected the sovereignty of governments, the world economy, and military strategy. What took a century for the Industrial Revolution to do is nothing like what the combination of computers and telecommunications has been
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now