¶ … relationship exists between difference of religion and the occurrence of civil wars within societies. The relationship between religious groups to society can be defined against the backdrop of war. Powerful emotions surround both conflict and military conflict (Yinger, 1946). A direct relationship has been recognized for several year regarding religion and violence. Students of organized religion "have frequently pointed out the ease with which most church leaders shift, at the outbreak of war, from an explicit antiwar position to a vigorous pro-war policy" (Yinger, p. 176). However, despite the seemingly strong tie between religion and war, it is critical to also acknowledge that while religion seems a backdrop for many wars, many other factors have contributed as well. Political aspirations and agendas have had as much to do with war as religion. The complex intermingling of these many different factors will be explored in greater detail below.
Recent research suggests that consistent with the teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas in the "absence of tranquilities ordinis, war may sometimes be a moral duty in order to overturn injustice and protect the innocent" (Neuhaus, 2003). The Pew research center recently conducted a national survey that examined how statements by religious leaders affect views of war. Studies suggest that those statements of religious leaders do incite and impact people's beliefs about the just cause of war. For example, in the times of the Crusades the Pope encouraged the West to defend the states of Europe against the common enemies of God. Religious differences and idealisms in this instance may be considered a contributor or motivator of people to continue war, but perhaps not the cause of wars between nations.
Religion is often associated with violence and civil war. Perhaps the most prevalent example is the case of Islam and the violence of the jihad; Muslims are searching for peace in Islam. Holy wars have been incited in the name of God. One people are fighting to secure their views over another. Islam is an example of a religion that is associated with violence. But is religion necessarily the cause of civil war in this instance? The idea that religious differences are the sole cause of civil war however, may be due to popular imagery rather than fact. Violence in fact has not always been associated directly with religions. Violence should be defined on the basis that it is a social phenomenon. Religious text and scripture have suggested that violence has existed throughout time; however no formal integral link has yet been established necessarily between religion and violence. The link that has been established rather, is that religious problems are often highlighted during civilian conflict in times of war. Religion may be considered a common bond between people, causing them to support one side vs. another.
There is evidence to suggest that religious differences do precipitate war like conditions. The religious cause of nations is often believed to be just. In the case of Iraq for example in modern times, the cause seems just; the just cause of freeing the Iraqi people was "consistently affirmed by the Pope, also in his messages both to Saddam Hussein and President Bush" (Neuhaus, 2003). There are many that would argue that a just cause justifies violence and war. But consider this, Osama Bin Laden led the Al Quada, whose mission is to spread violence and war between Muslim and non-Muslim groups. Certainly Al Quada believe that there cause is just as well. The people under any leader that is charismatic or influential might be led to believe that their cause is just. Whether one cause is more just than another however, is open to interpretation. Certainly Hitler was a charismatic leader who believed his cause, the extermination and genocide of the Jews was just. Common sense dictates that it was not however.
The Pew Research Center found in a national survey that only ten percent of statements made by religious leaders had a determinative effect on the opinions of family, friends, political commentators and elected leaders that are involved in political matters (Neuhas, 2003). Most religious fervent and supporters historically have spoken out against war (Neuhas, 2003). This does not however, suggest that war is not resultant from religious doctrine and differences.
There are many instances that also suggest that religion directly influences the probability of war. This evidence begins in the earliest documentation of history. For example, the French Wars of Religion occurred during the mid to late 1500s. During this time the French Protestants, referred to as Huguenots, were politically important and concentrated in certain areas within France. The wars that ensued were the result in part of direct religious influences.
The current war with Iraq has often been identified as a religious endeavor. The Iraqi war has been identified as a war that was fought more closely because of religious belief than because of political causes. Wars resulting from Islamic expansion generally have been noted from as early as the 7th Century. Thus one might justify that...
Religion as a Social Phenomenon Religion serves both a personal and a political function. As a personal phenomenon, religion can provide psychological and emotional sustenance, mitigate grief, and provide solace in the midst of existential crises. Similarly, religion can help people to resolve complex questions related to the nature of transcendental experiences ranging from love and sexuality to the sublimity of nature. We all have a sense of "wonder" that religion
Religion and Society Religion is defined as an organized collection of belief systems, views about the universe, or cultural systems that humans use to relate spiritual and moral values to their lives. Many religions have symbols, traditions, and histories that explain the origin of life, the way the universe works, and the moral, ethical and legal ways to organize human life (De Vries, ed., 2008). While the exact origin of religion
Religion and War Religion has been, and will continue to be, a cause of war. It is the purpose of this paper to demonstrate how religion, but more precisely faith-based thinking, has been used to foment violence and cause war. To understand the role that religion has played in sparking violence and causing nations, tribes, etc. To go to war, one must first understand what exactly war is. One of the best
Examples where religion has become intersected with politics are present throughout the entire history, and in more recent years, include the debates on same sex marriages or on abortion. A more specific look at the relationship between politics and religion has revealed at least three points of intersection -- the role of churches, the evolution of human rights and the emergence and impacts of religious conflicts. In terms of the
"Embryo cloning is the technology that would make the creation of eugenically engineered 'designer babies' commercially feasible." (Darnovsky M. 2002) This also relates to the growing concern in some quarters that technologies such as stem cell manipulation can be subject to abuse. "Many disability rights activists argue that it is being used in a misguided search for 'perfect' babies, and many feminists voice concern about its use to satisfy
This means that there must be some correlation between religion and politics. Indeed Keddie (2003) asserts that there is an aversion to the word secular and that most countries that try to embrace this idea are not content. According to Carroll (2003) this inevitable link between religion and politics forces the question of whether or not the world would be better off without religion. The author asserts that misconceptions about
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now