A higher percentage of both men and women stated that men usually made more of the decisions, were less emotionally involved, and usually experienced "the better deal." Lastly, male dominance -- but not equality of power between genders -- was found to be linked with greater romantic relationship longevity. It seemed that the higher the relative degree given by the respondents to the male (rather than the female partner of the dyad), the lower the consequential rate of relationship dissolution (Felmlee, 1994).
An imbalance of power may promote the actual solidity of a relationship, but this has been much less often researched than other conclusions. The previous findings that inequalities in power are linked to unhappiness, psychological distress, and disagreement mean that power imbalances will raise the likelihood that a relationship would fail; however, no distinctions were found between balanced power and male dominant college couples in separations. Nevertheless, the balance of power could impact relationship stability in ways that have not been scrutinized previously, because balance discrepancies in power might increase the rate at which a relationship dissipates over time. This study found that the more equal the power balance, the lower the rate of relationship dissolution. It is also possible for other types of power imbalances to influence relational stability. For example, perhaps it is not perceptions of imbalanced power that have an impact on relationship dissolution, but instead perceptions of having power over the other person. Relationships that endure may be those in which the people involved feel particularly powerful, and it is possible for both members of a dyad to concurrently feel more powerful than the other. Relationships that survive, then, could be those in which both partners convince themselves that they are equally powerful (Felmlee, 1994). Felmlee's research also found that it is possible for imbalances in power, on the basis of gender, to affect the survival time of a romantic relationship. That is, it may be that having one gender "on top" gives romantic relationships added stability.
According to Knapp, there are five stages in which the relationship deteriorates after bonding has occurred:
Differentiating: This happens when a couple thinks that perhaps the relationship is too restricting. It is at this point when the people begin to hone in on their differences instead of their similarities. They complain of not having enough space and decide that they would like to do more things by themselves. In other words, they begin to stress their individuality. The most obvious change in communication is the increase in fighting, bickering, or quarreling.
Circumscribing: This term refers to a stage in which partners begin to decrease the frequency and intimacy of their communication. They tend to evade specific "hot topics" like money and sex since they are too likely to create more disagreements. They begin to tip-toe around, asking for consent to do things that they formerly would not have asked permission for. "Is it okay with you if I take a nap now?" "I don't care. Do whatever you please."
Stagnating: This reflects the increasing corrosion of a relationship that the couple is trying to keep together. There may be a number of reasons they do this -- religious, financial, or for the children involved. Verbal and nonverbal communication becomes more and more like talking to a stranger. The relationship itself is no longer talked about.
Avoiding: This stage is a coping mechanism to diminish the pain of experiencing relationship deprecation, and physical absence is frequent. Avoidance frequently takes place between neighbors or coworkers after a big dispute. The people must still remain in close proximity, but they manage to maintain minimum contact.
Terminating: This is the ending phase of any relationship. This stage can take place even after the briefest relationships or lifetime relationships. According to Knapp, who applies his theory to the briefest of encounters as well as to long-standing relationships, usually, the longer, deeper, and more meaningful relationships involve more pain and the process tends to be long and drawn out. Distant and dissociative communication is exchanged at this time. For example, "I don't care to ever see you again!" Or "I'll always love you, but I can neither live with you nor respect you." (McGraw Hill, 1994).
The most recent approach to relationship dissolution is to treat it as a basic element in the life of the relationship, not as a separate event or course of action. This development views the negotiation and conclusion of the breakup as something intertwined with all the other ventures and activities that the couple performs in their daily lives, implementing the same sorts of negotiation and conversational styles (Duck, Rollie, 1982, 1998).
Relationship...
Abusive Relationships: The Cinderella Effect in Myth and Reality One of the most popular fairy tales is that of Cinderella. The story of Cinderella tells the story of a young woman whom is absorbed into a new, reconstructed stepfamily after her own mother has died. Her father has married another woman, a widow with two children from a previous relationship. After the wedding, Cinderella finds herself in a reduced state. Once
Abusive Relationships Women in Abusive Relationships The Bureau of Justice Statistics (2006) states that during the 1990's, the major reason for 22% of divorce cases in the American society was violence. In a similar context, among all the female victims who were murdered during 2003, approximately 30% were slaughtered by their husbands and boyfriends. Such thought provoking and disappointing statistics show the ongoing violence being faced by women which is not only
In conclusion, a hypothesis is appropriate. There are empirically proven factors related to an abused woman's decision to leave a relationship (Strube, et al., 1984) that should be part of any counselling program for abused women. To wit, a study of 251 battered women shows that the following facts generally were true of women who left: more likely than not they were employed; those who left had been in the
Abusive Relationships, Patterns of Violence, the Future of the Family Part 1 Some women remain in abusive relationships for different reasons. Some are scared to leave. Others feel that they still love the person so to leave because they are being abused would be wrong. Some see the abuse as a trade-off that comes with the security the person provides, such as money, shelter, etc. Sometimes there is a co-dependency and the
women stay abusive relationships briefly cover steps remedy situation. (Approx 1000 words). General opinions over the reason women choose to remain within abusive relationships may differ. For outsiders, these women may appear exaggeratedly naive or perhaps weak. However, it is also generally understood that women who end up struggling with their husband/partner's abusive behavior are subject to specific psychological typologies. These may have been brought up and educated by highly
Introduction to Marriage and Abusive RelationshipsIn many marriage environments, abuse takes the form of domestic violence that comes with control or posing threats to the partner. It takes more specific formats like physical violence, which features violence such as beating and hitting and gradually becoming a frequent behavior.[footnoteRef:1] Secondly, sexual abuse is equally common where one partner forces themself to the other. Psychological abuse is also predominant in marriages. One
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now